Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2017-06-15

Map

Map

Adams	Bayh	59.1%
	Bowen	39.8%
	Other	1.1%

Allen	Bayh	50.1%
	Bowen	48.4%
	Other	1.4%

Bartholomew	Bayh	52.9%
	Bowen	46.3%
	Other	0.8%

Benton	Bayh	48.6%
	Bowen	48.5%
	Other	2.9%

Blackford	Bayh	58.2%
	Bowen	40.9%
	Other	1.0%

Boone	Bayh	41.7%
	Bowen	57.4%
	Other	0.9%

Brown	Bayh	54.2%
	Bowen	44.3%
	Other	1.5%

Carroll	Bayh	53.3%
	Bowen	46.1%
	Other	0.7%

Cass	Bayh	52.3%
	Bowen	46.7%
	Other	1.0%

Clark	Bayh	60.9%
	Bowen	38.1%
	Other	1.0%

Clay	Bayh	62.2%
	Bowen	35.7%
	Other	2.1%

Clinton	Bayh	49.1%
	Bowen	50.1%
	Other	0.8%

Crawford	Bayh	54.5%
	Bowen	44.9%
	Other	0.5%

Daviess	Bayh	47.6%
	Bowen	51.9%
	Other	0.5%

Dearborn	Bayh	46.1%
	Bowen	52.0%
	Other	1.9%

Decatur	Bayh	50.3%
	Bowen	48.4%
	Other	1.3%

DeKalb	Bayh	55.3%
	Bowen	43.7%
	Other	1.0%

Delaware	Bayh	59.0%
	Bowen	39.3%
	Other	1.7%

Dubois	Bayh	62.4%
	Bowen	36.6%
	Other	1.0%

Elkhart	Bayh	46.6%
	Bowen	52.7%
	Other	0.7%

Fayette	Bayh	56.0%
	Bowen	43.2%
	Other	0.8%

Floyd	Bayh	56.9%
	Bowen	42.4%
	Other	0.8%

Fountain	Bayh	48.7%
	Bowen	50.1%
	Other	1.1%

Franklin	Bayh	50.7%
	Bowen	47.1%
	Other	2.2%

Fulton	Bayh	49.8%
	Bowen	48.5%
	Other	1.7%

Gibson	Bayh	64.8%
	Bowen	34.5%
	Other	0.8%

Grant	Bayh	49.4%
	Bowen	49.7%
	Other	0.9%

Greene	Bayh	58.4%
	Bowen	40.5%
	Other	1.1%

Hamilton	Bayh	33.5%
	Bowen	65.6%
	Other	1.0%

Hancock	Bayh	46.7%
	Bowen	51.6%
	Other	1.7%

Harrison	Bayh	55.4%
	Bowen	43.1%
	Other	1.5%

Hendricks	Bayh	39.4%
	Bowen	59.4%
	Other	1.2%

Henry	Bayh	54.7%
	Bowen	44.3%
	Other	1.0%

Howard	Bayh	52.3%
	Bowen	46.5%
	Other	1.2%

Huntington	Bayh	53.9%
	Bowen	45.6%
	Other	0.5%

Jackson	Bayh	54.3%
	Bowen	44.8%
	Other	0.9%

Jasper	Bayh	38.2%
	Bowen	60.2%
	Other	1.6%

Jay	Bayh	54.1%
	Bowen	44.4%
	Other	1.4%

Jefferson	Bayh	53.6%
	Bowen	45.2%
	Other	1.2%

Jennings	Bayh	53.0%
	Bowen	46.2%
	Other	0.8%

Johnson	Bayh	45.0%
	Bowen	53.4%
	Other	1.6%

Knox	Bayh	58.4%
	Bowen	40.5%
	Other	1.1%

Kosciusko	Bayh	41.4%
	Bowen	57.3%
	Other	1.3%

LaGrange	Bayh	41.8%
	Bowen	57.6%
	Other	0.6%

Lake	Bayh	63.5%
	Bowen	35.0%
	Other	1.6%

LaPorte	Bayh	53.5%
	Bowen	44.7%
	Other	1.8%

Lawrence	Bayh	47.0%
	Bowen	52.0%
	Other	1.0%

Madison	Bayh	55.2%
	Bowen	43.3%
	Other	1.5%

Marion	Bayh	48.9%
	Bowen	49.7%
	Other	1.4%

Marshall	Bayh	45.2%
	Bowen	53.8%
	Other	1.0%

Martin	Bayh	58.2%
	Bowen	41.3%
	Other	0.5%

Miami	Bayh	50.3%
	Bowen	48.8%
	Other	0.8%

Monroe	Bayh	53.0%
	Bowen	45.0%
	Other	2.0%

Montgomery	Bayh	44.9%
	Bowen	53.7%
	Other	1.4%

Morgan	Bayh	42.1%
	Bowen	56.7%
	Other	1.2%

Newton	Bayh	40.5%
	Bowen	57.6%
	Other	2.0%

Noble	Bayh	59.0%
	Bowen	40.0%
	Other	0.9%

Ohio	Bayh	48.6%
	Bowen	49.5%
	Other	1.9%

Orange	Bayh	42.8%
	Bowen	55.9%
	Other	1.3%

Owen	Bayh	56.5%
	Bowen	42.6%
	Other	0.9%

Parke	Bayh	53.4%
	Bowen	44.4%
	Other	2.2%

Perry	Bayh	64.8%
	Bowen	34.9%
	Other	0.3%

Pike	Bayh	62.1%
	Bowen	36.8%
	Other	1.1%

Porter	Bayh	44.0%
	Bowen	53.9%
	Other	2.2%

Posey	Bayh	64.8%
	Bowen	34.2%
	Other	1.0%

Pulaski	Bayh	49.2%
	Bowen	49.9%
	Other	0.9%

Putnam	Bayh	52.9%
	Bowen	45.7%
	Other	1.4%

Randolph	Bayh	48.3%
	Bowen	50.5%
	Other	1.2%

Ripley	Bayh	45.7%
	Bowen	53.7%
	Other	0.6%

Rush	Bayh	49.3%
	Bowen	49.3%
	Other	1.4%

St. Joseph	Bayh	61.9%
	Bowen	37.5%
	Other	0.6%

Scott	Bayh	60.4%
	Bowen	38.6%
	Other	1.0%

Shelby	Bayh	51.6%
	Bowen	47.4%
	Other	0.9%

Spencer	Bayh	54.1%
	Bowen	45.7%
	Other	0.2%

Starke	Bayh	59.2%
	Bowen	39.4%
	Other	1.4%

Steuben	Bayh	48.0%
	Bowen	51.1%
	Other	1.0%

Sullivan	Bayh	68.2%
	Bowen	30.6%
	Other	1.2%

Switzerland	Bayh	55.9%
	Bowen	43.5%
	Other	0.6%

Tippecanoe	Bayh	51.2%
	Bowen	46.2%
	Other	2.6%

Tipton	Bayh	48.4%
	Bowen	50.8%
	Other	0.8%

Union	Bayh	38.0%
	Bowen	60.1%
	Other	1.9%

Vanderburgh	Bayh	61.6%
	Bowen	37.4%
	Other	1.0%

Vermillion	Bayh	66.8%
	Bowen	30.5%
	Other	2.7%

Vigo	Bayh	66.1%
	Bowen	31.5%
	Other	2.4%

Wabash	Bayh	45.8%
	Bowen	53.1%
	Other	1.0%

Warren	Bayh	51.0%
	Bowen	46.5%
	Other	2.5%

Warrick	Bayh	63.4%
	Bowen	35.4%
	Other	1.2%

Washington	Bayh	48.3%
	Bowen	50.2%
	Other	1.5%

Wayne	Bayh	43.7%
	Bowen	54.6%
	Other	1.7%

Wells	Bayh	53.8%
	Bowen	45.0%
	Other	1.2%

White	Bayh	53.1%
	Bowen	45.6%
	Other	1.3%

Whitley	Bayh	53.5%
	Bowen	44.9%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Indiana Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved