Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2020-03-31

Map

Map

Aitkin	Bullock	4.4%
	Faulk	3.6%
	Humphrey	86.8%
	Other	5.2%

Anoka	Bullock	3.8%
	Faulk	2.3%
	Humphrey	88.9%
	Other	5.1%

Becker	Bullock	6.1%
	Faulk	3.5%
	Humphrey	85.8%
	Other	4.7%

Beltrami	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	4.4%
	Humphrey	86.5%
	Other	5.1%

Benton	Bullock	6.5%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	84.3%
	Other	6.4%

Big Stone	Bullock	4.1%
	Faulk	2.3%
	Humphrey	90.0%
	Other	3.6%

Blue Earth	Bullock	3.7%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	88.9%
	Other	4.8%

Brown	Bullock	3.9%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	89.0%
	Other	4.0%

Carlton	Bullock	2.6%
	Faulk	2.1%
	Humphrey	91.5%
	Other	3.7%

Carver	Bullock	5.7%
	Faulk	2.4%
	Humphrey	85.2%
	Other	6.7%

Cass	Bullock	5.7%
	Faulk	4.8%
	Humphrey	84.0%
	Other	5.4%

Chippewa	Bullock	3.5%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	89.0%
	Other	4.6%

Chisago	Bullock	5.5%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	86.1%
	Other	5.7%

Clay	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	88.8%
	Other	4.4%

Clearwater	Bullock	5.2%
	Faulk	4.9%
	Humphrey	84.3%
	Other	5.7%

Cook	Bullock	3.2%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	85.7%
	Other	8.3%

Cottonwood	Bullock	2.2%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	91.1%
	Other	3.8%

Crow Wing	Bullock	2.9%
	Faulk	3.5%
	Humphrey	88.8%
	Other	4.8%

Dakota	Bullock	6.2%
	Faulk	4.7%
	Humphrey	83.1%
	Other	6.0%

Dodge	Bullock	4.6%
	Faulk	4.1%
	Humphrey	87.2%
	Other	4.1%

Douglas	Bullock	5.2%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	87.2%
	Other	4.6%

Faribault	Bullock	5.2%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	88.5%
	Other	3.5%

Fillmore	Bullock	3.8%
	Faulk	4.4%
	Humphrey	86.7%
	Other	5.1%

Freeborn	Bullock	3.7%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	90.1%
	Other	3.4%

Goodhue	Bullock	3.5%
	Faulk	3.1%
	Humphrey	88.5%
	Other	4.9%

Grant	Bullock	2.8%
	Faulk	2.2%
	Humphrey	92.0%
	Other	3.0%

Hennepin	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	3.3%
	Humphrey	86.2%
	Other	6.5%

Houston	Bullock	5.7%
	Faulk	4.6%
	Humphrey	83.1%
	Other	6.6%

Hubbard	Bullock	5.7%
	Faulk	4.3%
	Humphrey	85.1%
	Other	5.0%

Isanti	Bullock	4.5%
	Faulk	1.9%
	Humphrey	88.6%
	Other	5.0%

Itasca	Bullock	6.1%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	86.3%
	Other	4.9%

Jackson	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	2.0%
	Humphrey	90.3%
	Other	3.7%

Kanabec	Bullock	3.6%
	Faulk	3.3%
	Humphrey	87.3%
	Other	5.8%

Kandiyohi	Bullock	3.7%
	Faulk	3.6%
	Humphrey	88.3%
	Other	4.3%

Kittson	Bullock	4.7%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	87.3%
	Other	5.0%

Koochiching	Bullock	6.1%
	Faulk	3.3%
	Humphrey	84.5%
	Other	6.0%

Lac Qui Parle	Bullock	3.5%
	Faulk	2.6%
	Humphrey	89.5%
	Other	4.4%

Lake	Bullock	3.1%
	Faulk	2.0%
	Humphrey	91.8%
	Other	3.1%

Lake of the Woods	Bullock	4.8%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	89.2%
	Other	3.2%

Le Sueur	Bullock	6.0%
	Faulk	2.3%
	Humphrey	87.5%
	Other	4.1%

Lincoln	Bullock	4.6%
	Faulk	3.9%
	Humphrey	87.6%
	Other	3.9%

Lyon	Bullock	3.2%
	Faulk	3.1%
	Humphrey	89.9%
	Other	3.8%

McLeod	Bullock	6.9%
	Faulk	3.7%
	Humphrey	83.4%
	Other	5.9%

Mahnomen	Bullock	7.2%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	85.0%
	Other	5.0%

Marshall	Bullock	4.1%
	Faulk	3.8%
	Humphrey	87.5%
	Other	4.5%

Martin	Bullock	3.6%
	Faulk	2.0%
	Humphrey	89.5%
	Other	4.9%

Meeker	Bullock	4.5%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	88.3%
	Other	4.4%

Mille Lacs	Bullock	4.7%
	Faulk	2.1%
	Humphrey	88.4%
	Other	4.9%

Morrison	Bullock	3.4%
	Faulk	4.0%
	Humphrey	89.0%
	Other	3.6%

Mower	Bullock	6.8%
	Faulk	3.6%
	Humphrey	84.3%
	Other	5.3%

Murray	Bullock	3.9%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	87.6%
	Other	5.8%

Nicollet	Bullock	3.6%
	Faulk	2.5%
	Humphrey	88.8%
	Other	5.1%

Nobles	Bullock	2.7%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	90.9%
	Other	3.6%

Norman	Bullock	4.8%
	Faulk	1.8%
	Humphrey	89.0%
	Other	4.4%

Olmsted	Bullock	6.5%
	Faulk	4.3%
	Humphrey	83.0%
	Other	6.2%

Otter Tail	Bullock	4.1%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	87.9%
	Other	5.0%

Pennington	Bullock	3.9%
	Faulk	2.6%
	Humphrey	89.0%
	Other	4.6%

Pine	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	3.5%
	Humphrey	87.9%
	Other	4.6%

Pipestone	Bullock	4.3%
	Faulk	2.6%
	Humphrey	88.8%
	Other	4.3%

Polk	Bullock	3.8%
	Faulk	2.4%
	Humphrey	89.3%
	Other	4.4%

Pope	Bullock	6.3%
	Faulk	2.6%
	Humphrey	86.7%
	Other	4.3%

Ramsey	Bullock	8.2%
	Faulk	4.9%
	Humphrey	78.5%
	Other	8.3%

Red Lake	Bullock	3.8%
	Faulk	3.2%
	Humphrey	90.6%
	Other	2.5%

Redwood	Bullock	4.4%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	86.1%
	Other	6.9%

Renville	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	2.5%
	Humphrey	89.9%
	Other	3.6%

Rice	Bullock	3.9%
	Faulk	2.4%
	Humphrey	89.3%
	Other	4.5%

Rock	Bullock	4.0%
	Faulk	4.2%
	Humphrey	87.6%
	Other	4.3%

Roseau	Bullock	5.3%
	Faulk	4.0%
	Humphrey	85.7%
	Other	5.0%

St. Louis	Bullock	4.3%
	Faulk	2.6%
	Humphrey	89.1%
	Other	4.0%

Scott	Bullock	9.3%
	Faulk	3.4%
	Humphrey	78.6%
	Other	8.8%

Sherburne	Bullock	5.1%
	Faulk	3.0%
	Humphrey	84.5%
	Other	7.4%

Sibley	Bullock	4.4%
	Faulk	2.7%
	Humphrey	87.8%
	Other	5.1%

Stearns	Bullock	4.8%
	Faulk	4.6%
	Humphrey	85.4%
	Other	5.2%

Steele	Bullock	3.9%
	Faulk	3.3%
	Humphrey	88.8%
	Other	4.1%

Stevens	Bullock	3.3%
	Faulk	4.5%
	Humphrey	86.2%
	Other	6.0%

Swift	Bullock	2.7%
	Faulk	3.5%
	Humphrey	91.0%
	Other	2.8%

Todd	Bullock	7.0%
	Faulk	3.2%
	Humphrey	85.3%
	Other	4.5%

Traverse	Bullock	7.1%
	Faulk	3.7%
	Humphrey	85.4%
	Other	3.8%

Wabasha	Bullock	4.2%
	Faulk	2.9%
	Humphrey	88.1%
	Other	4.8%

Wadena	Bullock	4.4%
	Faulk	3.6%
	Humphrey	87.3%
	Other	4.7%

Waseca	Bullock	3.8%
	Faulk	2.8%
	Humphrey	88.9%
	Other	4.5%

Washington	Bullock	5.3%
	Faulk	3.5%
	Humphrey	84.4%
	Other	6.8%

Watonwan	Bullock	2.6%
	Faulk	2.3%
	Humphrey	91.0%
	Other	4.0%

Wilkin	Bullock	5.2%
	Faulk	4.4%
	Humphrey	83.8%
	Other	6.7%

Winona	Bullock	4.2%
	Faulk	5.9%
	Humphrey	84.9%
	Other	5.0%

Wright	Bullock	5.3%
	Faulk	1.9%
	Humphrey	88.2%
	Other	4.7%

Yellow Medicine	Bullock	3.6%
	Faulk	1.5%
	Humphrey	89.9%
	Other	5.0%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Minnesota Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved