Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2012-12-10

Map

Map

Adams	Earl	35.8%
	Thompson	63.5%
	Other	0.6%

Ashland	Earl	48.7%
	Thompson	49.7%
	Other	1.6%

Barron	Earl	48.1%
	Thompson	51.3%
	Other	0.6%

Bayfield	Earl	50.4%
	Thompson	48.2%
	Other	1.4%

Brown	Earl	43.3%
	Thompson	55.7%
	Other	1.0%

Buffalo	Earl	48.2%
	Thompson	51.3%
	Other	0.6%

Burnett	Earl	54.0%
	Thompson	44.5%
	Other	1.5%

Calumet	Earl	35.9%
	Thompson	62.8%
	Other	1.3%

Chippewa	Earl	48.8%
	Thompson	47.9%
	Other	3.2%

Clark	Earl	40.8%
	Thompson	57.9%
	Other	1.3%

Columbia	Earl	39.7%
	Thompson	59.7%
	Other	0.6%

Crawford	Earl	34.7%
	Thompson	64.2%
	Other	1.0%

Dane	Earl	58.8%
	Thompson	39.7%
	Other	1.5%

Dodge	Earl	32.4%
	Thompson	66.7%
	Other	0.9%

Door	Earl	35.5%
	Thompson	63.7%
	Other	0.9%

Douglas	Earl	65.9%
	Thompson	33.3%
	Other	0.7%

Dunn	Earl	54.1%
	Thompson	44.8%
	Other	1.1%

Eau Claire	Earl	51.3%
	Thompson	47.4%
	Other	1.3%

Florence	Earl	47.5%
	Thompson	52.1%
	Other	0.4%

Fond du Lac	Earl	34.3%
	Thompson	64.8%
	Other	0.8%

Forest	Earl	49.5%
	Thompson	49.7%
	Other	0.8%

Grant	Earl	36.4%
	Thompson	62.8%
	Other	0.7%

Green	Earl	38.8%
	Thompson	60.0%
	Other	1.2%

Green Lake	Earl	25.4%
	Thompson	73.6%
	Other	0.9%

Iowa	Earl	44.8%
	Thompson	54.3%
	Other	0.9%

Iron	Earl	53.0%
	Thompson	46.2%
	Other	0.8%

Jackson	Earl	45.0%
	Thompson	54.3%
	Other	0.6%

Jefferson	Earl	40.2%
	Thompson	59.0%
	Other	0.8%

Juneau	Earl	26.3%
	Thompson	73.1%
	Other	0.7%

Kenosha	Earl	60.4%
	Thompson	38.8%
	Other	0.8%

Kewaunee	Earl	42.4%
	Thompson	56.8%
	Other	0.8%

La Crosse	Earl	46.0%
	Thompson	52.9%
	Other	1.1%

Lafayette	Earl	40.1%
	Thompson	59.3%
	Other	0.6%

Langlade	Earl	39.7%
	Thompson	59.4%
	Other	0.9%

Lincoln	Earl	45.4%
	Thompson	53.3%
	Other	1.3%

Manitowoc	Earl	41.7%
	Thompson	56.8%
	Other	1.5%

Marathon	Earl	43.4%
	Thompson	55.3%
	Other	1.3%

Marinette	Earl	38.5%
	Thompson	60.7%
	Other	0.8%

Marquette	Earl	30.7%
	Thompson	68.5%
	Other	0.8%

Menominee	Earl	75.7%
	Thompson	23.9%
	Other	0.4%

Milwaukee	Earl	54.8%
	Thompson	44.2%
	Other	1.0%

Monroe	Earl	35.6%
	Thompson	63.7%
	Other	0.8%

Oconto	Earl	38.8%
	Thompson	60.3%
	Other	0.9%

Oneida	Earl	41.4%
	Thompson	57.9%
	Other	0.7%

Outagamie	Earl	37.8%
	Thompson	61.2%
	Other	1.1%

Ozaukee	Earl	33.9%
	Thompson	65.3%
	Other	0.8%

Pepin	Earl	47.5%
	Thompson	51.2%
	Other	1.3%

Pierce	Earl	56.4%
	Thompson	42.6%
	Other	1.0%

Polk	Earl	54.3%
	Thompson	44.7%
	Other	1.0%

Portage	Earl	53.4%
	Thompson	45.3%
	Other	1.3%

Price	Earl	37.7%
	Thompson	61.4%
	Other	0.9%

Racine	Earl	47.9%
	Thompson	51.1%
	Other	1.0%

Richland	Earl	34.5%
	Thompson	64.5%
	Other	1.1%

Rock	Earl	48.9%
	Thompson	50.0%
	Other	1.1%

Rusk	Earl	45.8%
	Thompson	53.0%
	Other	1.2%

St. Croix	Earl	52.7%
	Thompson	46.8%
	Other	0.5%

Sauk	Earl	37.5%
	Thompson	61.9%
	Other	0.6%

Sawyer	Earl	38.4%
	Thompson	60.4%
	Other	1.2%

Shawano	Earl	33.2%
	Thompson	66.1%
	Other	0.7%

Sheboygan	Earl	49.2%
	Thompson	49.9%
	Other	0.8%

Taylor	Earl	36.0%
	Thompson	62.5%
	Other	1.4%

Trempealeau	Earl	50.1%
	Thompson	49.3%
	Other	0.6%

Vernon	Earl	37.2%
	Thompson	62.1%
	Other	0.7%

Vilas	Earl	31.1%
	Thompson	68.3%
	Other	0.6%

Walworth	Earl	38.5%
	Thompson	60.4%
	Other	1.1%

Washburn	Earl	46.0%
	Thompson	53.0%
	Other	1.0%

Washington	Earl	36.4%
	Thompson	62.6%
	Other	1.0%

Waukesha	Earl	36.5%
	Thompson	62.6%
	Other	0.9%

Waupaca	Earl	34.1%
	Thompson	64.9%
	Other	0.9%

Waushara	Earl	31.6%
	Thompson	67.2%
	Other	1.2%

Winnebago	Earl	39.6%
	Thompson	59.0%
	Other	1.3%

Wood	Earl	40.7%
	Thompson	58.3%
	Other	1.0%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Wisconsin Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved