Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Albany	Abrams	52.9%
	D'Amato	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Allegany	Abrams	35.0%
	D'Amato	59.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Bronx	Abrams	66.7%
	D'Amato	31.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Broome	Abrams	42.2%
	D'Amato	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Cattaraugus	Abrams	39.4%
	D'Amato	53.0%
		0.0%
	Other	7.6%

Cayuga	Abrams	37.8%
	D'Amato	55.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Chautauqua	Abrams	44.6%
	D'Amato	49.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Chemung	Abrams	33.2%
	D'Amato	63.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Chenango	Abrams	36.1%
	D'Amato	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Clinton	Abrams	40.5%
	D'Amato	55.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Columbia	Abrams	40.2%
	D'Amato	55.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Cortland	Abrams	37.0%
	D'Amato	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Delaware	Abrams	39.4%
	D'Amato	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Dutchess	Abrams	40.0%
	D'Amato	56.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Erie	Abrams	49.0%
	D'Amato	45.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Essex	Abrams	39.6%
	D'Amato	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Franklin	Abrams	42.1%
	D'Amato	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Fulton	Abrams	38.0%
	D'Amato	57.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Genesee	Abrams	37.2%
	D'Amato	57.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Greene	Abrams	34.2%
	D'Amato	61.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Hamilton	Abrams	32.9%
	D'Amato	63.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Herkimer	Abrams	36.9%
	D'Amato	59.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Jefferson	Abrams	35.6%
	D'Amato	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Kings	Abrams	58.9%
	D'Amato	39.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Lewis	Abrams	35.4%
	D'Amato	59.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Livingston	Abrams	37.5%
	D'Amato	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Madison	Abrams	37.7%
	D'Amato	55.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Monroe	Abrams	44.9%
	D'Amato	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Montgomery	Abrams	42.8%
	D'Amato	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Nassau	Abrams	40.5%
	D'Amato	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

New York	Abrams	76.3%
	D'Amato	21.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Niagara	Abrams	46.0%
	D'Amato	48.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Oneida	Abrams	37.4%
	D'Amato	58.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Onondaga	Abrams	40.3%
	D'Amato	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Ontario	Abrams	39.7%
	D'Amato	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Orange	Abrams	37.4%
	D'Amato	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Orleans	Abrams	35.8%
	D'Amato	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Oswego	Abrams	35.2%
	D'Amato	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	8.2%

Otsego	Abrams	44.1%
	D'Amato	51.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Putnam	Abrams	34.5%
	D'Amato	62.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Queens	Abrams	52.7%
	D'Amato	45.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Rensselaer	Abrams	42.6%
	D'Amato	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Richmond	Abrams	31.1%
	D'Amato	67.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Rockland	Abrams	39.8%
	D'Amato	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

St. Lawrence	Abrams	44.1%
	D'Amato	49.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Saratoga	Abrams	40.4%
	D'Amato	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Schenectady	Abrams	45.8%
	D'Amato	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Schoharie	Abrams	38.4%
	D'Amato	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Schuyler	Abrams	35.2%
	D'Amato	60.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Seneca	Abrams	35.5%
	D'Amato	59.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Steuben	Abrams	30.6%
	D'Amato	64.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Suffolk	Abrams	39.3%
	D'Amato	57.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Sullivan	Abrams	43.7%
	D'Amato	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Tioga	Abrams	36.6%
	D'Amato	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Tompkins	Abrams	58.4%
	D'Amato	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Ulster	Abrams	42.6%
	D'Amato	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Warren	Abrams	40.8%
	D'Amato	54.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Washington	Abrams	38.4%
	D'Amato	56.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Wayne	Abrams	35.1%
	D'Amato	59.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Westchester	Abrams	46.3%
	D'Amato	51.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Wyoming	Abrams	33.6%
	D'Amato	60.1%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Yates	Abrams	35.3%
	D'Amato	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

National DataGraph for 1992 - New York Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved