Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Hunt	47.7%
	Gardner	48.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Alexander	Hunt	44.4%
	Gardner	52.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Alleghany	Hunt	52.7%
	Gardner	44.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Anson	Hunt	70.4%
	Gardner	27.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Ashe	Hunt	49.0%
	Gardner	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Avery	Hunt	35.2%
	Gardner	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Beaufort	Hunt	50.7%
	Gardner	46.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Bertie	Hunt	67.4%
	Gardner	31.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Bladen	Hunt	65.2%
	Gardner	33.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Brunswick	Hunt	51.9%
	Gardner	42.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Buncombe	Hunt	52.2%
	Gardner	45.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Burke	Hunt	50.1%
	Gardner	46.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Cabarrus	Hunt	45.4%
	Gardner	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Caldwell	Hunt	44.3%
	Gardner	50.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Camden	Hunt	56.5%
	Gardner	41.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Carteret	Hunt	49.1%
	Gardner	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Caswell	Hunt	66.3%
	Gardner	32.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Catawba	Hunt	42.1%
	Gardner	52.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Chatham	Hunt	59.3%
	Gardner	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Cherokee	Hunt	49.0%
	Gardner	50.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Chowan	Hunt	61.8%
	Gardner	36.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Clay	Hunt	47.8%
	Gardner	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Cleveland	Hunt	53.7%
	Gardner	42.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Columbus	Hunt	68.3%
	Gardner	29.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Craven	Hunt	47.6%
	Gardner	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Cumberland	Hunt	57.5%
	Gardner	38.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Currituck	Hunt	53.6%
	Gardner	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Dare	Hunt	55.5%
	Gardner	41.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Davidson	Hunt	42.2%
	Gardner	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Davie	Hunt	37.6%
	Gardner	58.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Duplin	Hunt	57.6%
	Gardner	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Durham	Hunt	65.3%
	Gardner	31.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Edgecombe	Hunt	64.0%
	Gardner	33.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Forsyth	Hunt	50.9%
	Gardner	44.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Franklin	Hunt	56.8%
	Gardner	38.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Gaston	Hunt	41.3%
	Gardner	53.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Gates	Hunt	74.7%
	Gardner	24.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Graham	Hunt	49.0%
	Gardner	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Granville	Hunt	59.7%
	Gardner	35.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Greene	Hunt	59.4%
	Gardner	39.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Guilford	Hunt	56.8%
	Gardner	37.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Halifax	Hunt	62.5%
	Gardner	34.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Harnett	Hunt	50.3%
	Gardner	46.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Haywood	Hunt	55.7%
	Gardner	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Henderson	Hunt	40.9%
	Gardner	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Hertford	Hunt	71.0%
	Gardner	28.1%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Hoke	Hunt	69.6%
	Gardner	28.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Hyde	Hunt	64.3%
	Gardner	33.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Iredell	Hunt	43.0%
	Gardner	51.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Jackson	Hunt	57.5%
	Gardner	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Johnston	Hunt	47.3%
	Gardner	48.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Jones	Hunt	59.2%
	Gardner	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Lee	Hunt	53.2%
	Gardner	42.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Lenoir	Hunt	56.4%
	Gardner	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Lincoln	Hunt	44.8%
	Gardner	50.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

McDowell	Hunt	49.6%
	Gardner	47.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Macon	Hunt	48.7%
	Gardner	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Madison	Hunt	55.9%
	Gardner	42.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Martin	Hunt	60.9%
	Gardner	37.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Mecklenburg	Hunt	53.3%
	Gardner	41.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Mitchell	Hunt	31.8%
	Gardner	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	Hunt	57.3%
	Gardner	39.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Moore	Hunt	47.1%
	Gardner	50.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Nash	Hunt	43.4%
	Gardner	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

New Hanover	Hunt	49.3%
	Gardner	43.4%
		0.0%
	Other	7.3%

Northampton	Hunt	72.0%
	Gardner	26.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Onslow	Hunt	45.9%
	Gardner	49.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Orange	Hunt	69.1%
	Gardner	26.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Pamlico	Hunt	56.2%
	Gardner	40.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Pasquotank	Hunt	63.2%
	Gardner	35.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Pender	Hunt	52.4%
	Gardner	41.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Perquimans	Hunt	62.7%
	Gardner	35.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Person	Hunt	48.7%
	Gardner	47.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Pitt	Hunt	55.9%
	Gardner	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Polk	Hunt	49.1%
	Gardner	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Randolph	Hunt	39.8%
	Gardner	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Richmond	Hunt	67.4%
	Gardner	29.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Robeson	Hunt	71.7%
	Gardner	26.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Rockingham	Hunt	54.7%
	Gardner	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Rowan	Hunt	43.7%
	Gardner	50.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Rutherford	Hunt	48.5%
	Gardner	47.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Sampson	Hunt	54.1%
	Gardner	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Scotland	Hunt	69.8%
	Gardner	28.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Stanly	Hunt	45.3%
	Gardner	51.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Stokes	Hunt	47.7%
	Gardner	49.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Surry	Hunt	50.2%
	Gardner	47.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Swain	Hunt	55.1%
	Gardner	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Transylvania	Hunt	48.1%
	Gardner	48.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Tyrrell	Hunt	64.5%
	Gardner	33.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Union	Hunt	45.9%
	Gardner	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Vance	Hunt	61.7%
	Gardner	35.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Wake	Hunt	56.9%
	Gardner	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Warren	Hunt	64.9%
	Gardner	32.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Washington	Hunt	63.9%
	Gardner	34.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Watauga	Hunt	51.2%
	Gardner	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Wayne	Hunt	48.6%
	Gardner	49.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Wilkes	Hunt	41.1%
	Gardner	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Wilson	Hunt	61.7%
	Gardner	36.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Yadkin	Hunt	36.5%
	Gardner	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Yancey	Hunt	52.6%
	Gardner	46.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

National DataGraph for 1992 - North Carolina Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved