Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Abbeville	Hollings	61.5%
	Hartnett	36.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Aiken	Hollings	44.9%
	Hartnett	51.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Allendale	Hollings	71.5%
	Hartnett	26.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Anderson	Hollings	45.0%
	Hartnett	52.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Bamberg	Hollings	70.8%
	Hartnett	27.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Barnwell	Hollings	56.2%
	Hartnett	41.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Beaufort	Hollings	43.3%
	Hartnett	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Berkeley	Hollings	47.4%
	Hartnett	49.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Calhoun	Hollings	60.2%
	Hartnett	37.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Charleston	Hollings	53.2%
	Hartnett	44.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Cherokee	Hollings	51.5%
	Hartnett	45.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Chester	Hollings	60.4%
	Hartnett	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Chesterfield	Hollings	57.8%
	Hartnett	40.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Clarendon	Hollings	62.2%
	Hartnett	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Colleton	Hollings	56.6%
	Hartnett	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Darlington	Hollings	53.9%
	Hartnett	42.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Dillon	Hollings	64.3%
	Hartnett	34.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Dorchester	Hollings	45.4%
	Hartnett	52.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Edgefield	Hollings	58.3%
	Hartnett	39.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Fairfield	Hollings	69.3%
	Hartnett	27.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Florence	Hollings	49.5%
	Hartnett	48.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Georgetown	Hollings	55.1%
	Hartnett	42.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Greenville	Hollings	39.9%
	Hartnett	57.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Greenwood	Hollings	48.7%
	Hartnett	48.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Hampton	Hollings	65.9%
	Hartnett	32.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Horry	Hollings	45.9%
	Hartnett	50.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Jasper	Hollings	62.1%
	Hartnett	35.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Kershaw	Hollings	49.2%
	Hartnett	47.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Lancaster	Hollings	53.4%
	Hartnett	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Laurens	Hollings	54.9%
	Hartnett	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Lee	Hollings	69.7%
	Hartnett	29.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Lexington	Hollings	37.7%
	Hartnett	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

McCormick	Hollings	72.6%
	Hartnett	25.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Marion	Hollings	63.6%
	Hartnett	34.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Marlboro	Hollings	72.4%
	Hartnett	25.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Newberry	Hollings	51.8%
	Hartnett	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Oconee	Hollings	42.6%
	Hartnett	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Orangeburg	Hollings	65.9%
	Hartnett	31.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Pickens	Hollings	39.8%
	Hartnett	56.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Richland	Hollings	58.2%
	Hartnett	38.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Saluda	Hollings	52.8%
	Hartnett	43.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Spartanburg	Hollings	46.3%
	Hartnett	50.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Sumter	Hollings	53.7%
	Hartnett	44.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Union	Hollings	56.8%
	Hartnett	40.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Williamsburg	Hollings	64.9%
	Hartnett	33.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

York	Hollings	44.1%
	Hartnett	52.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

National DataGraph for 1992 - South Carolina Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved