Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2008-03-20

Map

Map

Beaver	Graham	31.2%
	Burns	68.0%
	Other	0.8%

Box Elder	Graham	40.8%
	Burns	55.7%
	Other	3.5%

Cache	Graham	40.9%
	Burns	56.7%
	Other	2.3%

Carbon	Graham	73.4%
	Burns	25.1%
	Other	1.5%

Daggett	Graham	47.8%
	Burns	52.2%

Davis	Graham	44.9%
	Burns	52.7%
	Other	2.4%

Duchesne	Graham	48.1%
	Burns	48.9%
	Other	2.9%

Emery	Graham	54.1%
	Burns	45.2%
	Other	0.7%

Garfield	Graham	24.7%
	Burns	74.7%
	Other	0.7%

Grand	Graham	54.8%
	Burns	41.1%
	Other	4.1%

Iron	Graham	19.9%
	Burns	78.3%
	Other	1.8%

Juab	Graham	41.7%
	Burns	57.3%
	Other	1.1%

Kane	Graham	25.9%
	Burns	71.8%
	Other	2.4%

Millard	Graham	32.2%
	Burns	65.8%
	Other	2.0%

Morgan	Graham	41.2%
	Burns	58.0%
	Other	0.8%

Piute	Graham	32.5%
	Burns	67.2%
	Other	0.3%

Rich	Graham	40.6%
	Burns	59.1%
	Other	0.4%

Salt Lake	Graham	56.1%
	Burns	41.6%
	Other	2.3%

San Juan	Graham	51.5%
	Burns	48.2%
	Other	0.3%

Sanpete	Graham	44.2%
	Burns	53.0%
	Other	2.9%

Sevier	Graham	37.9%
	Burns	59.8%
	Other	2.2%

Summit	Graham	61.5%
	Burns	35.9%
	Other	2.5%

Tooele	Graham	55.9%
	Burns	41.5%
	Other	2.6%

Uintah	Graham	45.2%
	Burns	51.4%
	Other	3.4%

Utah	Graham	37.5%
	Burns	60.7%
	Other	1.8%

Wasatch	Graham	50.0%
	Burns	48.1%
	Other	1.9%

Washington	Graham	29.0%
	Burns	68.2%
	Other	2.8%

Wayne	Graham	38.3%
	Burns	61.3%
	Other	0.4%

Weber	Graham	55.3%
	Burns	41.1%
	Other	3.6%

National DataGraph for 1992 - Utah Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved