1994 Comptroller General General Election Data Graphs - New York
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-05-25

Map

AlbanyMcCall62.3%
 
London36.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


AlleganyMcCall26.1%
 
London71.2%
 
Other2.6%
 


BronxMcCall79.7%
 
London19.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


BroomeMcCall43.4%
 
London54.3%
 
Other2.4%
 


CattaraugusMcCall32.1%
 
London65.8%
 
Other2.1%
 


CayugaMcCall34.9%
 
London62.3%
 
Other2.8%
 


ChautauquaMcCall40.1%
 
London58.3%
 
Other1.6%
 


ChemungMcCall39.8%
 
London57.5%
 
Other2.6%
 


ChenangoMcCall30.0%
 
London67.3%
 
Other2.7%
 


ClintonMcCall43.4%
 
London54.4%
 
Other2.2%
 


ColumbiaMcCall41.3%
 
London56.8%
 
Other1.9%
 


CortlandMcCall35.2%
 
London62.5%
 
Other2.3%
 


DelawareMcCall30.8%
 
London67.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


DutchessMcCall38.3%
 
London60.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


ErieMcCall48.7%
 
London49.7%
 
Other1.6%
 


EssexMcCall31.4%
 
London66.2%
 
Other2.4%
 


FranklinMcCall43.4%
 
London54.3%
 
Other2.3%
 


FultonMcCall33.3%
 
London64.5%
 
Other2.2%
 


GeneseeMcCall32.2%
 
London64.5%
 
Other3.4%
 


GreeneMcCall33.5%
 
London64.4%
 
Other2.1%
 


HamiltonMcCall26.8%
 
London71.2%
 
Other2.0%
 


HerkimerMcCall33.6%
 
London63.9%
 
Other2.5%
 


JeffersonMcCall33.5%
 
London63.4%
 
Other3.2%
 


KingsMcCall74.5%
 
London24.5%
 
Other1.0%
 


LewisMcCall27.6%
 
London70.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


LivingstonMcCall34.4%
 
London61.4%
 
Other4.2%
 


MadisonMcCall33.8%
 
London63.9%
 
Other2.3%
 


MonroeMcCall42.7%
 
London51.3%
 
Other6.0%
 


MontgomeryMcCall40.1%
 
London58.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


NassauMcCall46.8%
 
London52.3%
 
Other0.9%
 


New YorkMcCall81.7%
 
London17.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


NiagaraMcCall40.8%
 
London57.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


OneidaMcCall38.4%
 
London59.5%
 
Other2.1%
 


OnondagaMcCall42.4%
 
London55.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


OntarioMcCall34.2%
 
London60.8%
 
Other4.9%
 


OrangeMcCall40.8%
 
London57.6%
 
Other1.6%
 


OrleansMcCall29.2%
 
London66.6%
 
Other4.1%
 


OswegoMcCall29.8%
 
London67.1%
 
Other3.1%
 


OtsegoMcCall36.7%
 
London60.9%
 
Other2.4%
 


PutnamMcCall36.0%
 
London62.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


QueensMcCall66.2%
 
London32.7%
 
Other1.1%
 


RensselaerMcCall47.9%
 
London50.1%
 
Other1.9%
 


RichmondMcCall46.9%
 
London51.8%
 
Other1.3%
 


RocklandMcCall48.2%
 
London50.8%
 
Other1.0%
 


St. LawrenceMcCall39.2%
 
London58.2%
 
Other2.6%
 


SaratogaMcCall39.3%
 
London58.7%
 
Other2.0%
 


SchenectadyMcCall48.7%
 
London49.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


SchoharieMcCall37.0%
 
London60.7%
 
Other2.3%
 


SchuylerMcCall34.0%
 
London63.3%
 
Other2.7%
 


SenecaMcCall32.6%
 
London64.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


SteubenMcCall29.4%
 
London67.7%
 
Other3.0%
 


SuffolkMcCall41.6%
 
London56.9%
 
Other1.5%
 


SullivanMcCall42.5%
 
London56.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


TiogaMcCall31.9%
 
London65.2%
 
Other2.9%
 


TompkinsMcCall51.6%
 
London46.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


UlsterMcCall41.4%
 
London56.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


WarrenMcCall34.3%
 
London63.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


WashingtonMcCall33.1%
 
London63.8%
 
Other3.0%
 


WayneMcCall27.0%
 
London67.2%
 
Other5.7%
 


WestchesterMcCall53.0%
 
London46.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


WyomingMcCall29.7%
 
London67.5%
 
Other2.7%
 


YatesMcCall28.9%
 
London67.7%
 
Other3.5%
 



National DataGraph for 1994 - New York Results for 1994

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved