Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Romer	56.0%
	Benson	37.4%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Alamosa	Romer	56.8%
	Benson	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Arapahoe	Romer	57.3%
	Benson	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Archuleta	Romer	38.7%
	Benson	58.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Baca	Romer	35.9%
	Benson	62.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Bent	Romer	53.7%
	Benson	43.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Boulder	Romer	67.4%
	Benson	26.4%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Chaffee	Romer	48.6%
	Benson	47.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Cheyenne	Romer	34.1%
	Benson	63.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Clear Creek	Romer	56.7%
	Benson	37.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Conejos	Romer	60.8%
	Benson	36.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Costilla	Romer	70.4%
	Benson	26.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Crowley	Romer	38.1%
	Benson	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Custer	Romer	38.4%
	Benson	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Delta	Romer	40.8%
	Benson	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Denver	Romer	68.6%
	Benson	25.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Dolores	Romer	34.5%
	Benson	63.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Douglas	Romer	53.2%
	Benson	41.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Eagle	Romer	66.2%
	Benson	30.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Elbert	Romer	41.9%
	Benson	51.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

El Paso	Romer	37.9%
	Benson	52.7%
		0.0%
	Other	9.4%

Fremont	Romer	41.6%
	Benson	54.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Garfield	Romer	57.4%
	Benson	38.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Gilpin	Romer	48.4%
	Benson	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	8.3%

Grand	Romer	53.0%
	Benson	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Gunnison	Romer	59.0%
	Benson	31.0%
		0.0%
	Other	10.0%

Hinsdale	Romer	45.1%
	Benson	48.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Huerfano	Romer	50.4%
	Benson	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Jackson	Romer	22.6%
	Benson	74.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Jefferson	Romer	56.2%
	Benson	37.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Kiowa	Romer	40.7%
	Benson	56.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Kit Carson	Romer	46.8%
	Benson	50.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Lake	Romer	59.1%
	Benson	37.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

La Plata	Romer	53.8%
	Benson	42.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Larimer	Romer	57.6%
	Benson	35.2%
		0.0%
	Other	7.2%

Las Animas	Romer	54.6%
	Benson	43.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Lincoln	Romer	45.0%
	Benson	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Logan	Romer	53.5%
	Benson	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Mesa	Romer	49.8%
	Benson	46.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Mineral	Romer	52.6%
	Benson	45.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Moffat	Romer	42.0%
	Benson	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Montezuma	Romer	39.2%
	Benson	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Montrose	Romer	44.0%
	Benson	52.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Morgan	Romer	51.5%
	Benson	44.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Otero	Romer	48.8%
	Benson	48.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Ouray	Romer	44.7%
	Benson	52.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Park	Romer	45.7%
	Benson	47.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

Phillips	Romer	52.7%
	Benson	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Pitkin	Romer	72.2%
	Benson	23.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Prowers	Romer	50.9%
	Benson	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Pueblo	Romer	55.4%
	Benson	41.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Rio Blanco	Romer	38.3%
	Benson	59.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Rio Grande	Romer	46.7%
	Benson	50.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Routt	Romer	63.2%
	Benson	33.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Saguache	Romer	55.8%
	Benson	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

San Juan	Romer	41.3%
	Benson	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

San Miguel	Romer	64.7%
	Benson	26.0%
		0.0%
	Other	9.3%

Sedgwick	Romer	53.6%
	Benson	44.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Summit	Romer	64.2%
	Benson	31.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Teller	Romer	36.8%
	Benson	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	7.5%

Washington	Romer	37.1%
	Benson	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Weld	Romer	53.5%
	Benson	40.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Yuma	Romer	48.9%
	Benson	47.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

National DataGraph for 1994 - Colorado Results for 1994

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved