Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Gantt	38.4%
	Helms	60.0%
	Other	1.6%

Alexander	Gantt	34.1%
	Helms	64.3%
	Other	1.5%

Alleghany	Gantt	42.6%
	Helms	55.8%
	Other	1.6%

Anson	Gantt	57.9%
	Helms	41.1%
	Other	1.0%

Ashe	Gantt	38.7%
	Helms	59.7%
	Other	1.5%

Avery	Gantt	28.4%
	Helms	70.1%
	Other	1.5%

Beaufort	Gantt	39.4%
	Helms	59.3%
	Other	1.3%

Bertie	Gantt	62.3%
	Helms	37.1%
	Other	0.6%

Bladen	Gantt	51.8%
	Helms	47.2%
	Other	0.9%

Brunswick	Gantt	45.9%
	Helms	51.9%
	Other	2.2%

Buncombe	Gantt	49.9%
	Helms	48.3%
	Other	1.8%

Burke	Gantt	41.3%
	Helms	56.6%
	Other	2.1%

Cabarrus	Gantt	37.2%
	Helms	60.9%
	Other	1.8%

Caldwell	Gantt	35.4%
	Helms	62.9%
	Other	1.7%

Camden	Gantt	41.9%
	Helms	56.5%
	Other	1.6%

Carteret	Gantt	38.7%
	Helms	59.3%
	Other	1.9%

Caswell	Gantt	50.7%
	Helms	48.5%
	Other	0.8%

Catawba	Gantt	36.1%
	Helms	62.2%
	Other	1.7%

Chatham	Gantt	52.0%
	Helms	46.5%
	Other	1.5%

Cherokee	Gantt	43.1%
	Helms	55.8%
	Other	1.1%

Chowan	Gantt	51.3%
	Helms	46.5%
	Other	2.2%

Clay	Gantt	45.0%
	Helms	53.3%
	Other	1.7%

Cleveland	Gantt	44.5%
	Helms	54.1%
	Other	1.4%

Columbus	Gantt	49.4%
	Helms	49.3%
	Other	1.2%

Craven	Gantt	43.4%
	Helms	55.7%
	Other	0.9%

Cumberland	Gantt	51.3%
	Helms	47.2%
	Other	1.5%

Currituck	Gantt	39.7%
	Helms	58.8%
	Other	1.5%

Dare	Gantt	49.1%
	Helms	49.4%
	Other	1.5%

Davidson	Gantt	31.2%
	Helms	67.1%
	Other	1.8%

Davie	Gantt	28.2%
	Helms	70.2%
	Other	1.6%

Duplin	Gantt	46.0%
	Helms	53.0%
	Other	1.0%

Durham	Gantt	64.1%
	Helms	34.8%
	Other	1.1%

Edgecombe	Gantt	57.0%
	Helms	42.3%
	Other	0.7%

Forsyth	Gantt	45.2%
	Helms	53.3%
	Other	1.5%

Franklin	Gantt	45.9%
	Helms	53.0%
	Other	1.1%

Gaston	Gantt	35.4%
	Helms	63.1%
	Other	1.5%

Gates	Gantt	56.8%
	Helms	42.6%
	Other	0.6%

Graham	Gantt	37.2%
	Helms	61.9%
	Other	0.9%

Granville	Gantt	48.4%
	Helms	50.7%
	Other	0.9%

Greene	Gantt	39.3%
	Helms	59.8%
	Other	0.9%

Guilford	Gantt	50.6%
	Helms	47.9%
	Other	1.5%

Halifax	Gantt	55.2%
	Helms	44.0%
	Other	0.8%

Harnett	Gantt	37.5%
	Helms	61.4%
	Other	1.1%

Haywood	Gantt	48.3%
	Helms	49.8%
	Other	1.9%

Henderson	Gantt	38.2%
	Helms	59.7%
	Other	2.0%

Hertford	Gantt	65.1%
	Helms	34.4%
	Other	0.5%

Hoke	Gantt	59.0%
	Helms	39.1%
	Other	2.0%

Hyde	Gantt	49.7%
	Helms	49.1%
	Other	1.2%

Iredell	Gantt	36.8%
	Helms	61.3%
	Other	1.9%

Jackson	Gantt	54.1%
	Helms	44.6%
	Other	1.4%

Johnston	Gantt	33.0%
	Helms	65.9%
	Other	1.1%

Jones	Gantt	47.1%
	Helms	52.0%
	Other	0.9%

Lee	Gantt	41.7%
	Helms	57.1%
	Other	1.2%

Lenoir	Gantt	44.2%
	Helms	55.2%
	Other	0.5%

Lincoln	Gantt	37.2%
	Helms	61.0%
	Other	1.8%

McDowell	Gantt	37.4%
	Helms	60.8%
	Other	1.9%

Macon	Gantt	41.2%
	Helms	56.4%
	Other	2.4%

Madison	Gantt	48.7%
	Helms	50.0%
	Other	1.2%

Martin	Gantt	47.0%
	Helms	52.4%
	Other	0.6%

Mecklenburg	Gantt	54.5%
	Helms	44.2%
	Other	1.3%

Mitchell	Gantt	25.5%
	Helms	72.9%
	Other	1.6%

Montgomery	Gantt	45.5%
	Helms	52.8%
	Other	1.8%

Moore	Gantt	40.5%
	Helms	58.3%
	Other	1.2%

Nash	Gantt	37.5%
	Helms	61.6%
	Other	0.9%

New Hanover	Gantt	47.0%
	Helms	50.9%
	Other	2.1%

Northampton	Gantt	63.9%
	Helms	35.5%
	Other	0.6%

Onslow	Gantt	39.7%
	Helms	58.2%
	Other	2.1%

Orange	Gantt	67.6%
	Helms	31.0%
	Other	1.4%

Pamlico	Gantt	46.2%
	Helms	52.5%
	Other	1.3%

Pasquotank	Gantt	52.8%
	Helms	45.9%
	Other	1.3%

Pender	Gantt	46.4%
	Helms	51.9%
	Other	1.7%

Perquimans	Gantt	48.0%
	Helms	50.9%
	Other	1.2%

Person	Gantt	41.1%
	Helms	58.1%
	Other	0.8%

Pitt	Gantt	47.6%
	Helms	51.4%
	Other	1.0%

Polk	Gantt	45.7%
	Helms	52.6%
	Other	1.8%

Randolph	Gantt	29.1%
	Helms	69.1%
	Other	1.8%

Richmond	Gantt	53.3%
	Helms	44.8%
	Other	1.9%

Robeson	Gantt	61.8%
	Helms	37.2%
	Other	1.1%

Rockingham	Gantt	40.4%
	Helms	58.1%
	Other	1.5%

Rowan	Gantt	37.1%
	Helms	60.7%
	Other	2.2%

Rutherford	Gantt	39.2%
	Helms	58.9%
	Other	2.0%

Sampson	Gantt	45.0%
	Helms	54.3%
	Other	0.7%

Scotland	Gantt	56.9%
	Helms	41.8%
	Other	1.2%

Stanly	Gantt	34.6%
	Helms	63.7%
	Other	1.7%

Stokes	Gantt	31.1%
	Helms	67.5%
	Other	1.4%

Surry	Gantt	37.6%
	Helms	61.2%
	Other	1.3%

Swain	Gantt	52.1%
	Helms	46.4%
	Other	1.5%

Transylvania	Gantt	44.1%
	Helms	53.3%
	Other	2.6%

Tyrrell	Gantt	51.9%
	Helms	47.3%
	Other	0.9%

Union	Gantt	34.6%
	Helms	64.1%
	Other	1.3%

Vance	Gantt	52.1%
	Helms	47.2%
	Other	0.6%

Wake	Gantt	50.6%
	Helms	48.2%
	Other	1.2%

Warren	Gantt	61.8%
	Helms	37.5%
	Other	0.7%

Washington	Gantt	52.6%
	Helms	46.4%
	Other	1.0%

Watauga	Gantt	49.0%
	Helms	48.6%
	Other	2.3%

Wayne	Gantt	39.2%
	Helms	60.2%
	Other	0.6%

Wilkes	Gantt	32.5%
	Helms	65.9%
	Other	1.6%

Wilson	Gantt	45.2%
	Helms	54.2%
	Other	0.7%

Yadkin	Gantt	23.4%
	Helms	75.0%
	Other	1.6%

Yancey	Gantt	46.8%
	Helms	52.1%
	Other	1.1%

National DataGraph for 1996 - North Carolina Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved