1996 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AlamanceHunt51.2%
 
Hayes47.6%
 
Other1.3%
 


AlexanderHunt43.9%
 
Hayes55.2%
 
Other0.9%
 


AlleghanyHunt57.2%
 
Hayes41.7%
 
Other1.1%
 


AnsonHunt73.4%
 
Hayes25.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


AsheHunt48.6%
 
Hayes50.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


AveryHunt34.8%
 
Hayes63.9%
 
Other1.3%
 


BeaufortHunt57.3%
 
Hayes41.9%
 
Other0.8%
 


BertieHunt78.4%
 
Hayes21.1%
 
Other0.5%
 


BladenHunt70.4%
 
Hayes28.9%
 
Other0.7%
 


BrunswickHunt57.0%
 
Hayes41.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


BuncombeHunt51.7%
 
Hayes46.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


BurkeHunt49.0%
 
Hayes49.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


CabarrusHunt42.3%
 
Hayes56.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


CaldwellHunt46.7%
 
Hayes52.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


CamdenHunt67.3%
 
Hayes31.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


CarteretHunt52.8%
 
Hayes45.8%
 
Other1.4%
 


CaswellHunt69.7%
 
Hayes29.7%
 
Other0.6%
 


CatawbaHunt42.9%
 
Hayes55.9%
 
Other1.2%
 


ChathamHunt62.1%
 
Hayes36.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


CherokeeHunt49.3%
 
Hayes49.6%
 
Other1.2%
 


ChowanHunt67.5%
 
Hayes31.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


ClayHunt49.2%
 
Hayes49.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


ClevelandHunt56.1%
 
Hayes42.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


ColumbusHunt71.3%
 
Hayes27.7%
 
Other0.9%
 


CravenHunt57.1%
 
Hayes42.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


CumberlandHunt59.4%
 
Hayes39.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


CurrituckHunt63.3%
 
Hayes34.9%
 
Other1.8%
 


DareHunt64.4%
 
Hayes33.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


DavidsonHunt45.1%
 
Hayes53.6%
 
Other1.3%
 


DavieHunt40.1%
 
Hayes59.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


DuplinHunt64.8%
 
Hayes34.6%
 
Other0.6%
 


DurhamHunt71.2%
 
Hayes27.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


EdgecombeHunt72.8%
 
Hayes26.6%
 
Other0.6%
 


ForsythHunt54.1%
 
Hayes44.5%
 
Other1.4%
 


FranklinHunt64.6%
 
Hayes34.2%
 
Other1.2%
 


GastonHunt47.7%
 
Hayes51.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


GatesHunt78.0%
 
Hayes21.7%
 
Other0.3%
 


GrahamHunt46.6%
 
Hayes53.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


GranvilleHunt66.9%
 
Hayes32.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


GreeneHunt65.3%
 
Hayes34.3%
 
Other0.4%
 


GuilfordHunt56.4%
 
Hayes42.2%
 
Other1.5%
 


HalifaxHunt69.2%
 
Hayes30.2%
 
Other0.7%
 


HarnettHunt55.4%
 
Hayes43.5%
 
Other1.1%
 


HaywoodHunt54.6%
 
Hayes43.9%
 
Other1.5%
 


HendersonHunt41.0%
 
Hayes57.9%
 
Other1.1%
 


HertfordHunt79.3%
 
Hayes19.9%
 
Other0.7%
 


HokeHunt70.5%
 
Hayes28.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


HydeHunt69.5%
 
Hayes29.6%
 
Other1.0%
 


IredellHunt46.0%
 
Hayes52.7%
 
Other1.2%
 


JacksonHunt56.7%
 
Hayes41.7%
 
Other1.6%
 


JohnstonHunt53.5%
 
Hayes45.6%
 
Other0.9%
 


JonesHunt65.4%
 
Hayes33.9%
 
Other0.8%
 


LeeHunt58.5%
 
Hayes40.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


LenoirHunt63.8%
 
Hayes35.7%
 
Other0.5%
 


LincolnHunt46.4%
 
Hayes52.5%
 
Other1.1%
 


McDowellHunt49.5%
 
Hayes49.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


MaconHunt48.5%
 
Hayes49.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


MadisonHunt55.1%
 
Hayes43.8%
 
Other1.1%
 


MartinHunt71.9%
 
Hayes27.6%
 
Other0.4%
 


MecklenburgHunt54.8%
 
Hayes44.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


MitchellHunt34.1%
 
Hayes65.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


MontgomeryHunt59.5%
 
Hayes39.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


MooreHunt47.9%
 
Hayes51.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


NashHunt54.8%
 
Hayes44.4%
 
Other0.7%
 


New HanoverHunt54.5%
 
Hayes43.7%
 
Other1.8%
 


NorthamptonHunt78.2%
 
Hayes21.2%
 
Other0.6%
 


OnslowHunt54.8%
 
Hayes43.5%
 
Other1.7%
 


OrangeHunt71.8%
 
Hayes25.7%
 
Other2.5%
 


PamlicoHunt61.1%
 
Hayes37.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


PasquotankHunt69.0%
 
Hayes29.6%
 
Other1.3%
 


PenderHunt58.1%
 
Hayes40.4%
 
Other1.5%
 


PerquimansHunt69.1%
 
Hayes29.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


PersonHunt64.3%
 
Hayes35.1%
 
Other0.7%
 


PittHunt63.8%
 
Hayes35.4%
 
Other0.8%
 


PolkHunt49.3%
 
Hayes49.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


RandolphHunt40.8%
 
Hayes58.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


RichmondHunt67.1%
 
Hayes31.2%
 
Other1.7%
 


RobesonHunt74.9%
 
Hayes24.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


RockinghamHunt55.5%
 
Hayes43.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


RowanHunt45.1%
 
Hayes53.1%
 
Other1.8%
 


RutherfordHunt49.8%
 
Hayes49.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


SampsonHunt60.3%
 
Hayes39.1%
 
Other0.7%
 


ScotlandHunt68.0%
 
Hayes31.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


StanlyHunt44.5%
 
Hayes54.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


StokesHunt46.1%
 
Hayes52.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


SurryHunt50.2%
 
Hayes48.8%
 
Other1.0%
 


SwainHunt55.7%
 
Hayes43.1%
 
Other1.3%
 


TransylvaniaHunt46.0%
 
Hayes52.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


TyrrellHunt75.2%
 
Hayes24.5%
 
Other0.3%
 


UnionHunt45.1%
 
Hayes53.8%
 
Other1.1%
 


VanceHunt70.1%
 
Hayes29.3%
 
Other0.7%
 


WakeHunt62.6%
 
Hayes36.1%
 
Other1.3%
 


WarrenHunt71.1%
 
Hayes28.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


WashingtonHunt72.0%
 
Hayes27.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


WataugaHunt51.9%
 
Hayes44.6%
 
Other3.4%
 


WayneHunt54.7%
 
Hayes44.7%
 
Other0.6%
 


WilkesHunt44.9%
 
Hayes54.1%
 
Other1.1%
 


WilsonHunt67.2%
 
Hayes32.3%
 
Other0.5%
 


YadkinHunt38.9%
 
Hayes60.4%
 
Other0.7%
 


YanceyHunt55.3%
 
Hayes44.0%
 
Other0.7%
 



National DataGraph for 1996 - North Carolina Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved