Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-05-20

Map

Map

Alamance	Boyles	48.6%
	Duncan	49.1%
	Other	2.2%

Alexander	Boyles	42.5%
	Duncan	56.3%
	Other	1.2%

Alleghany	Boyles	52.2%
	Duncan	45.9%
	Other	1.8%

Anson	Boyles	73.1%
	Duncan	24.5%
	Other	2.4%

Ashe	Boyles	46.3%
	Duncan	51.8%
	Other	1.9%

Avery	Boyles	31.9%
	Duncan	65.6%
	Other	2.5%

Beaufort	Boyles	55.6%
	Duncan	42.9%
	Other	1.5%

Bertie	Boyles	78.5%
	Duncan	20.7%
	Other	0.9%

Bladen	Boyles	68.3%
	Duncan	30.5%
	Other	1.2%

Brunswick	Boyles	49.1%
	Duncan	48.9%
	Other	1.9%

Buncombe	Boyles	49.9%
	Duncan	47.3%
	Other	2.8%

Burke	Boyles	49.6%
	Duncan	48.1%
	Other	2.3%

Cabarrus	Boyles	41.0%
	Duncan	56.7%
	Other	2.4%

Caldwell	Boyles	43.0%
	Duncan	55.1%
	Other	1.8%

Camden	Boyles	57.8%
	Duncan	40.6%
	Other	1.6%

Carteret	Boyles	43.9%
	Duncan	54.0%
	Other	2.1%

Caswell	Boyles	68.4%
	Duncan	30.8%
	Other	0.8%

Catawba	Boyles	39.6%
	Duncan	58.6%
	Other	1.8%

Chatham	Boyles	56.2%
	Duncan	41.5%
	Other	2.3%

Cherokee	Boyles	45.2%
	Duncan	53.2%
	Other	1.6%

Chowan	Boyles	62.8%
	Duncan	35.2%
	Other	2.0%

Clay	Boyles	46.8%
	Duncan	52.1%
	Other	1.1%

Cleveland	Boyles	56.0%
	Duncan	42.4%
	Other	1.7%

Columbus	Boyles	67.2%
	Duncan	31.3%
	Other	1.6%

Craven	Boyles	50.3%
	Duncan	48.4%
	Other	1.3%

Cumberland	Boyles	55.9%
	Duncan	42.4%
	Other	1.7%

Currituck	Boyles	45.8%
	Duncan	51.0%
	Other	3.3%

Dare	Boyles	45.8%
	Duncan	51.6%
	Other	2.5%

Davidson	Boyles	39.7%
	Duncan	57.7%
	Other	2.6%

Davie	Boyles	35.5%
	Duncan	63.6%
	Other	1.0%

Duplin	Boyles	62.0%
	Duncan	37.0%
	Other	1.1%

Durham	Boyles	52.1%
	Duncan	46.0%
	Other	1.9%

Edgecombe	Boyles	72.7%
	Duncan	26.3%
	Other	0.9%

Forsyth	Boyles	44.4%
	Duncan	53.9%
	Other	1.7%

Franklin	Boyles	61.2%
	Duncan	37.5%
	Other	1.3%

Gaston	Boyles	42.9%
	Duncan	55.1%
	Other	2.0%

Gates	Boyles	75.3%
	Duncan	24.2%
	Other	0.6%

Graham	Boyles	43.6%
	Duncan	55.6%
	Other	0.8%

Granville	Boyles	66.8%
	Duncan	32.0%
	Other	1.2%

Greene	Boyles	63.4%
	Duncan	35.6%
	Other	1.0%

Guilford	Boyles	52.1%
	Duncan	46.2%
	Other	1.7%

Halifax	Boyles	70.9%
	Duncan	28.2%
	Other	0.9%

Harnett	Boyles	52.0%
	Duncan	46.4%
	Other	1.7%

Haywood	Boyles	58.2%
	Duncan	39.2%
	Other	2.6%

Henderson	Boyles	37.6%
	Duncan	60.5%
	Other	1.9%

Hertford	Boyles	77.6%
	Duncan	21.2%
	Other	1.2%

Hoke	Boyles	68.1%
	Duncan	29.5%
	Other	2.4%

Hyde	Boyles	72.2%
	Duncan	26.6%
	Other	1.2%

Iredell	Boyles	42.6%
	Duncan	55.5%
	Other	1.9%

Jackson	Boyles	55.9%
	Duncan	42.1%
	Other	2.0%

Johnston	Boyles	46.8%
	Duncan	51.9%
	Other	1.3%

Jones	Boyles	64.6%
	Duncan	34.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lee	Boyles	53.4%
	Duncan	45.1%
	Other	1.5%

Lenoir	Boyles	60.7%
	Duncan	38.6%
	Other	0.7%

Lincoln	Boyles	45.9%
	Duncan	52.2%
	Other	1.9%

McDowell	Boyles	48.2%
	Duncan	48.9%
	Other	2.9%

Macon	Boyles	47.1%
	Duncan	50.8%
	Other	2.0%

Madison	Boyles	55.5%
	Duncan	43.0%
	Other	1.5%

Martin	Boyles	70.7%
	Duncan	28.2%
	Other	1.1%

Mecklenburg	Boyles	50.2%
	Duncan	47.7%
	Other	2.1%

Mitchell	Boyles	29.5%
	Duncan	68.0%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	Boyles	57.8%
	Duncan	40.3%
	Other	1.9%

Moore	Boyles	41.9%
	Duncan	57.1%
	Other	1.0%

Nash	Boyles	52.2%
	Duncan	46.7%
	Other	1.1%

New Hanover	Boyles	43.4%
	Duncan	53.8%
	Other	2.8%

Northampton	Boyles	79.3%
	Duncan	19.2%
	Other	1.4%

Onslow	Boyles	45.9%
	Duncan	51.4%
	Other	2.7%

Orange	Boyles	60.9%
	Duncan	36.3%
	Other	2.9%

Pamlico	Boyles	56.4%
	Duncan	41.7%
	Other	1.9%

Pasquotank	Boyles	63.1%
	Duncan	35.3%
	Other	1.7%

Pender	Boyles	51.2%
	Duncan	46.1%
	Other	2.7%

Perquimans	Boyles	67.2%
	Duncan	31.4%
	Other	1.5%

Person	Boyles	59.7%
	Duncan	39.1%
	Other	1.2%

Pitt	Boyles	56.8%
	Duncan	41.9%
	Other	1.3%

Polk	Boyles	44.4%
	Duncan	53.3%
	Other	2.3%

Randolph	Boyles	34.8%
	Duncan	63.6%
	Other	1.7%

Richmond	Boyles	66.4%
	Duncan	31.3%
	Other	2.3%

Robeson	Boyles	74.5%
	Duncan	23.3%
	Other	2.2%

Rockingham	Boyles	51.5%
	Duncan	46.9%
	Other	1.6%

Rowan	Boyles	42.0%
	Duncan	55.5%
	Other	2.6%

Rutherford	Boyles	49.7%
	Duncan	48.3%
	Other	2.1%

Sampson	Boyles	54.0%
	Duncan	44.9%
	Other	1.1%

Scotland	Boyles	68.6%
	Duncan	29.8%
	Other	1.6%

Stanly	Boyles	41.1%
	Duncan	56.9%
	Other	2.1%

Stokes	Boyles	38.7%
	Duncan	60.0%
	Other	1.3%

Surry	Boyles	46.4%
	Duncan	52.3%
	Other	1.3%

Swain	Boyles	57.0%
	Duncan	41.1%
	Other	1.9%

Transylvania	Boyles	44.1%
	Duncan	52.6%
	Other	3.3%

Tyrrell	Boyles	75.3%
	Duncan	24.4%
	Other	0.3%

Union	Boyles	43.0%
	Duncan	55.5%
	Other	1.5%

Vance	Boyles	69.7%
	Duncan	29.2%
	Other	1.1%

Wake	Boyles	52.4%
	Duncan	45.9%
	Other	1.6%

Warren	Boyles	75.8%
	Duncan	23.0%
	Other	1.2%

Washington	Boyles	68.4%
	Duncan	29.4%
	Other	2.2%

Watauga	Boyles	47.7%
	Duncan	47.8%
	Other	4.5%

Wayne	Boyles	50.9%
	Duncan	48.2%
	Other	0.9%

Wilkes	Boyles	39.5%
	Duncan	58.8%
	Other	1.7%

Wilson	Boyles	56.2%
	Duncan	43.0%
	Other	0.7%

Yadkin	Boyles	31.5%
	Duncan	67.1%
	Other	1.4%

Yancey	Boyles	53.6%
	Duncan	44.8%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 1996 - North Carolina Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved