Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Fisher	37.4%
	Taft	58.1%
	Mitchel	2.9%
	Other	1.6%

Allen	Fisher	34.8%
	Taft	61.2%
	Mitchel	2.7%
	Other	1.3%

Ashland	Fisher	33.7%
	Taft	60.4%
	Mitchel	4.3%
	Other	1.6%

Ashtabula	Fisher	45.4%
	Taft	49.6%
	Mitchel	3.1%
	Other	1.9%

Athens	Fisher	51.9%
	Taft	39.8%
	Mitchel	6.3%
	Other	2.0%

Auglaize	Fisher	31.3%
	Taft	62.7%
	Mitchel	3.9%
	Other	2.1%

Belmont	Fisher	56.5%
	Taft	37.2%
	Mitchel	4.0%
	Other	2.4%

Brown	Fisher	40.0%
	Taft	54.5%
	Mitchel	3.4%
	Other	2.1%

Butler	Fisher	33.1%
	Taft	61.9%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	1.7%

Carroll	Fisher	40.5%
	Taft	53.5%
	Mitchel	4.2%
	Other	1.8%

Champaign	Fisher	36.6%
	Taft	55.4%
	Mitchel	5.0%
	Other	3.0%

Clark	Fisher	44.1%
	Taft	48.8%
	Mitchel	4.4%
	Other	2.7%

Clermont	Fisher	29.4%
	Taft	66.4%
	Mitchel	2.9%
	Other	1.4%

Clinton	Fisher	31.6%
	Taft	63.7%
	Mitchel	3.2%
	Other	1.5%

Columbiana	Fisher	45.3%
	Taft	48.2%
	Mitchel	4.4%
	Other	2.1%

Coshocton	Fisher	37.0%
	Taft	57.4%
	Mitchel	3.4%
	Other	2.3%

Crawford	Fisher	37.3%
	Taft	55.1%
	Mitchel	5.0%
	Other	2.6%

Cuyahoga	Fisher	58.3%
	Taft	37.9%
	Mitchel	2.4%
	Other	1.4%

Darke	Fisher	36.1%
	Taft	56.9%
	Mitchel	4.6%
	Other	2.4%

Defiance	Fisher	38.9%
	Taft	55.2%
	Mitchel	2.8%
	Other	3.1%

Delaware	Fisher	29.6%
	Taft	63.1%
	Mitchel	4.7%
	Other	2.6%

Erie	Fisher	48.5%
	Taft	47.7%
	Mitchel	2.3%
	Other	1.5%

Fairfield	Fisher	35.8%
	Taft	57.8%
	Mitchel	4.0%
	Other	2.4%

Fayette	Fisher	35.8%
	Taft	58.0%
	Mitchel	3.6%
	Other	2.6%

Franklin	Fisher	45.0%
	Taft	49.4%
	Mitchel	3.2%
	Other	2.4%

Fulton	Fisher	39.0%
	Taft	55.2%
	Mitchel	3.2%
	Other	2.6%

Gallia	Fisher	39.3%
	Taft	55.3%
	Mitchel	3.6%
	Other	1.7%

Geauga	Fisher	34.3%
	Taft	61.2%
	Mitchel	3.0%
	Other	1.5%

Greene	Fisher	37.1%
	Taft	56.0%
	Mitchel	4.5%
	Other	2.5%

Guernsey	Fisher	41.2%
	Taft	53.6%
	Mitchel	3.2%
	Other	2.0%

Hamilton	Fisher	37.2%
	Taft	59.2%
	Mitchel	2.4%
	Other	1.2%

Hancock	Fisher	30.3%
	Taft	65.0%
	Mitchel	2.9%
	Other	1.8%

Hardin	Fisher	39.2%
	Taft	53.3%
	Mitchel	4.6%
	Other	2.9%

Harrison	Fisher	50.7%
	Taft	43.4%
	Mitchel	3.7%
	Other	2.2%

Henry	Fisher	34.6%
	Taft	59.1%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	2.9%

Highland	Fisher	34.4%
	Taft	60.4%
	Mitchel	3.1%
	Other	2.0%

Hocking	Fisher	44.6%
	Taft	47.2%
	Mitchel	5.9%
	Other	2.4%

Holmes	Fisher	26.7%
	Taft	67.6%
	Mitchel	4.1%
	Other	1.6%

Huron	Fisher	39.2%
	Taft	55.1%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	2.4%

Jackson	Fisher	41.6%
	Taft	52.8%
	Mitchel	3.6%
	Other	2.0%

Jefferson	Fisher	51.7%
	Taft	40.6%
	Mitchel	4.6%
	Other	3.0%

Knox	Fisher	34.6%
	Taft	58.2%
	Mitchel	4.6%
	Other	2.6%

Lake	Fisher	40.7%
	Taft	53.7%
	Mitchel	3.5%
	Other	2.1%

Lawrence	Fisher	42.7%
	Taft	52.2%
	Mitchel	3.5%
	Other	1.7%

Licking	Fisher	37.6%
	Taft	55.5%
	Mitchel	4.3%
	Other	2.6%

Logan	Fisher	31.8%
	Taft	59.9%
	Mitchel	4.8%
	Other	3.4%

Lorain	Fisher	51.2%
	Taft	43.5%
	Mitchel	3.4%
	Other	1.8%

Lucas	Fisher	59.1%
	Taft	36.3%
	Mitchel	2.3%
	Other	2.3%

Madison	Fisher	35.4%
	Taft	57.3%
	Mitchel	4.4%
	Other	2.8%

Mahoning	Fisher	56.3%
	Taft	37.7%
	Mitchel	3.9%
	Other	2.1%

Marion	Fisher	42.7%
	Taft	49.3%
	Mitchel	5.1%
	Other	2.9%

Medina	Fisher	38.0%
	Taft	56.9%
	Mitchel	3.5%
	Other	1.6%

Meigs	Fisher	38.3%
	Taft	56.4%
	Mitchel	2.9%
	Other	2.3%

Mercer	Fisher	33.8%
	Taft	60.3%
	Mitchel	3.7%
	Other	2.1%

Miami	Fisher	36.5%
	Taft	56.3%
	Mitchel	4.5%
	Other	2.7%

Monroe	Fisher	55.2%
	Taft	38.4%
	Mitchel	4.3%
	Other	2.1%

Montgomery	Fisher	47.4%
	Taft	47.3%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	2.0%

Morgan	Fisher	35.5%
	Taft	58.6%
	Mitchel	4.1%
	Other	1.8%

Morrow	Fisher	37.4%
	Taft	53.4%
	Mitchel	6.1%
	Other	3.0%

Muskingum	Fisher	39.1%
	Taft	55.5%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	2.0%

Noble	Fisher	40.3%
	Taft	55.5%
	Mitchel	3.0%
	Other	1.3%

Ottawa	Fisher	46.7%
	Taft	47.3%
	Mitchel	3.1%
	Other	2.9%

Paulding	Fisher	39.1%
	Taft	55.7%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	1.9%

Perry	Fisher	46.9%
	Taft	45.7%
	Mitchel	4.9%
	Other	2.5%

Pickaway	Fisher	38.1%
	Taft	55.4%
	Mitchel	4.0%
	Other	2.6%

Pike	Fisher	53.5%
	Taft	42.4%
	Mitchel	2.7%
	Other	1.4%

Portage	Fisher	47.0%
	Taft	45.6%
	Mitchel	4.8%
	Other	2.6%

Preble	Fisher	36.5%
	Taft	54.4%
	Mitchel	6.2%
	Other	2.9%

Putnam	Fisher	31.7%
	Taft	63.4%
	Mitchel	2.9%
	Other	1.9%

Richland	Fisher	41.8%
	Taft	53.6%
	Mitchel	3.2%
	Other	1.5%

Ross	Fisher	48.2%
	Taft	47.2%
	Mitchel	3.0%
	Other	1.5%

Sandusky	Fisher	42.2%
	Taft	50.2%
	Mitchel	4.1%
	Other	3.4%

Scioto	Fisher	51.2%
	Taft	45.2%
	Mitchel	2.4%
	Other	1.1%

Seneca	Fisher	39.5%
	Taft	53.3%
	Mitchel	4.3%
	Other	2.9%

Shelby	Fisher	36.0%
	Taft	54.9%
	Mitchel	6.1%
	Other	3.0%

Stark	Fisher	44.1%
	Taft	50.5%
	Mitchel	3.6%
	Other	1.8%

Summit	Fisher	49.5%
	Taft	45.8%
	Mitchel	3.2%
	Other	1.6%

Trumbull	Fisher	57.5%
	Taft	36.2%
	Mitchel	4.4%
	Other	1.9%

Tuscarawas	Fisher	49.6%
	Taft	45.1%
	Mitchel	3.5%
	Other	1.8%

Union	Fisher	31.1%
	Taft	60.6%
	Mitchel	5.5%
	Other	2.8%

Van Wert	Fisher	30.9%
	Taft	65.4%
	Mitchel	2.2%
	Other	1.4%

Vinton	Fisher	47.2%
	Taft	46.5%
	Mitchel	4.2%
	Other	2.1%

Warren	Fisher	28.3%
	Taft	67.3%
	Mitchel	2.8%
	Other	1.5%

Washington	Fisher	34.3%
	Taft	62.1%
	Mitchel	2.3%
	Other	1.2%

Wayne	Fisher	33.9%
	Taft	61.0%
	Mitchel	3.3%
	Other	1.8%

Williams	Fisher	35.5%
	Taft	58.0%
	Mitchel	4.0%
	Other	2.4%

Wood	Fisher	45.1%
	Taft	49.6%
	Mitchel	2.8%
	Other	2.5%

Wyandot	Fisher	35.6%
	Taft	57.1%
	Mitchel	4.7%
	Other	2.6%

National DataGraph for 1998 - Ohio Results for 1998

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved