Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Anderson		25.2%
		73.3%
	Other	1.4%

Bedford		27.4%
		69.8%
	Other	2.8%

Benton		36.3%
		60.6%
	Other	3.1%

Bledsoe		37.0%
		61.0%
	Other	2.0%

Blount		19.2%
		79.1%
	Other	1.7%

Bradley		17.6%
		80.6%
	Other	1.8%

Campbell		32.3%
		66.2%
	Other	1.5%

Cannon		34.6%
		62.6%
	Other	2.8%

Carroll		29.3%
		68.9%
	Other	1.8%

Carter		20.0%
		77.2%
	Other	2.7%

Cheatham		31.4%
		66.1%
	Other	2.5%

Chester		25.2%
		73.6%
	Other	1.2%

Claiborne		27.5%
		71.2%
	Other	1.3%

Clay		36.0%
		63.0%
	Other	1.1%

Cocke		18.9%
		78.9%
	Other	2.2%

Coffee		28.9%
		69.1%
	Other	1.9%

Crockett		31.5%
		66.6%
	Other	1.9%

Cumberland		25.0%
		74.0%
	Other	1.0%

Davidson		40.1%
		57.7%
	Other	2.2%

Decatur		37.3%
		61.1%
	Other	1.6%

DeKalb		31.7%
		65.7%
	Other	2.6%

Dickson		34.8%
		62.8%
	Other	2.5%

Dyer		32.7%
		64.5%
	Other	2.8%

Fayette		26.9%
		70.8%
	Other	2.3%

Fentress		35.2%
		63.0%
	Other	1.8%

Franklin		32.3%
		65.5%
	Other	2.1%

Gibson		26.7%
		71.2%
	Other	2.1%

Giles		38.7%
		59.4%
	Other	1.9%

Grainger		26.5%
		72.1%
	Other	1.4%

Greene		21.2%
		76.1%
	Other	2.8%

Grundy		46.5%
		51.7%
	Other	1.7%

Hamblen		22.8%
		75.9%
	Other	1.3%

Hamilton		24.4%
		73.9%
	Other	1.7%

Hancock		25.5%
		73.0%
	Other	1.5%

Hardeman		36.6%
		60.5%
	Other	2.9%

Hardin		30.1%
		67.9%
	Other	2.0%

Hawkins		22.5%
		75.9%
	Other	1.6%

Haywood		36.3%
		61.6%
	Other	2.1%

Henderson		22.8%
		75.4%
	Other	1.8%

Henry		32.6%
		65.2%
	Other	2.3%

Hickman		40.4%
		56.6%
	Other	3.0%

Houston		45.3%
		52.8%
	Other	1.8%

Humphreys		39.6%
		57.9%
	Other	2.4%

Jackson		42.6%
		56.2%
	Other	1.2%

Jefferson		20.6%
		77.7%
	Other	1.8%

Johnson		23.6%
		74.1%
	Other	2.3%

Knox		23.7%
		74.2%
	Other	2.2%

Lake		60.9%
		37.1%
	Other	2.0%

Lauderdale		38.8%
		58.9%
	Other	2.3%

Lawrence		31.6%
		67.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lewis		35.3%
		62.9%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln		32.8%
		65.5%
	Other	1.7%

Loudon		18.6%
		80.0%
	Other	1.4%

McMinn		21.6%
		76.3%
	Other	2.1%

McNairy		29.7%
		68.6%
	Other	1.7%

Macon		23.0%
		75.8%
	Other	1.2%

Madison		25.7%
		72.7%
	Other	1.6%

Marion		42.0%
		56.6%
	Other	1.4%

Marshall		34.3%
		63.6%
	Other	2.0%

Maury		28.8%
		69.0%
	Other	2.2%

Meigs		32.4%
		66.2%
	Other	1.4%

Monroe		28.1%
		70.5%
	Other	1.4%

Montgomery		23.0%
		75.1%
	Other	1.9%

Moore		23.4%
		75.1%
	Other	1.5%

Morgan		48.6%
		49.4%
	Other	2.0%

Obion		34.3%
		61.6%
	Other	4.1%

Overton		47.2%
		51.0%
	Other	1.8%

Perry		45.1%
		53.0%
	Other	1.9%

Pickett		28.9%
		70.0%
	Other	1.1%

Polk		40.7%
		58.0%
	Other	1.3%

Putnam		26.2%
		71.6%
	Other	2.2%

Rhea		24.6%
		74.3%
	Other	1.1%

Roane		28.5%
		69.3%
	Other	2.3%

Robertson		31.3%
		66.3%
	Other	2.4%

Rutherford		28.5%
		69.8%
	Other	1.7%

Scott		29.3%
		69.0%
	Other	1.7%

Sequatchie		33.4%
		64.8%
	Other	1.8%

Sevier		17.0%
		81.6%
	Other	1.4%

Shelby		37.5%
		60.9%
	Other	1.6%

Smith		38.8%
		59.3%
	Other	2.0%

Stewart		36.8%
		60.3%
	Other	2.9%

Sullivan		20.4%
		78.1%
	Other	1.4%

Sumner		25.8%
		72.3%
	Other	1.9%

Tipton		22.9%
		74.5%
	Other	2.6%

Trousdale		39.8%
		58.1%
	Other	2.1%

Unicoi		18.8%
		78.4%
	Other	2.8%

Union		28.6%
		69.1%
	Other	2.3%

Van Buren		49.5%
		49.1%
	Other	1.5%

Warren		32.4%
		65.4%
	Other	2.2%

Washington		19.7%
		77.6%
	Other	2.7%

Wayne		29.9%
		68.8%
	Other	1.3%

Weakley		31.8%
		65.8%
	Other	2.4%

White		32.3%
		64.6%
	Other	3.1%

Williamson		19.3%
		79.6%
	Other	1.1%

Wilson		27.1%
		70.7%
	Other	2.3%

National DataGraph for 1998 - Tennessee Results for 1998

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved