1999 Gubernatorial Republican Primary Election Data Graphs - Mississippi
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-03-19

Map

AdamsBriggs14.5%
 
Parker78.6%
 
Williams3.1%
 
Other3.7%
 


AlcornBriggs31.6%
 
Parker48.9%
 
Williams3.7%
 
Other15.8%
 


AmiteBriggs8.4%
 
Parker79.4%
 
Williams3.7%
 
Other8.4%
 


AttalaBriggs22.8%
 
Parker51.8%
 
Williams5.9%
 
Other19.5%
 


BentonBriggs14.3%
 
Parker42.9%
 
Williams0.0%
 
Other42.9%
 


BolivarBriggs26.6%
 
Parker48.4%
 
Williams8.6%
 
Other16.4%
 


CalhounBriggs32.7%
 
Parker51.3%
 
Williams5.8%
 
Other10.3%
 


CarrollBriggs36.7%
 
Parker49.4%
 
Williams4.4%
 
Other9.5%
 


ChickasawBriggs37.5%
 
Parker45.5%
 
Williams8.0%
 
Other8.9%
 


ChoctawBriggs24.4%
 
Parker41.5%
 
Williams3.7%
 
Other30.5%
 


ClaiborneBriggs24.6%
 
Parker56.1%
 
Williams12.3%
 
Other7.0%
 


ClarkeBriggs39.7%
 
Parker45.0%
 
Williams7.0%
 
Other8.3%
 


ClayBriggs50.9%
 
Parker26.3%
 
Williams6.1%
 
Other16.7%
 


CoahomaBriggs21.4%
 
Parker67.9%
 
Williams7.1%
 
Other3.6%
 


CopiahBriggs10.7%
 
Parker51.9%
 
Williams5.8%
 
Other31.7%
 


CovingtonBriggs22.2%
 
Parker77.8%
 
Williams0.0%
 


DeSotoBriggs24.4%
 
Parker33.9%
 
Williams24.1%
 
Other17.6%
 


ForrestBriggs25.2%
 
Parker65.7%
 
Williams4.4%
 
Other4.6%
 


FranklinBriggs4.7%
 
Parker87.0%
 
Williams3.7%
 
Other4.7%
 


GeorgeBriggs21.1%
 
Parker62.4%
 
Williams6.6%
 
Other9.9%
 


GreeneBriggs23.8%
 
Parker52.4%
 
Williams14.3%
 
Other9.5%
 


GrenadaBriggs35.2%
 
Parker46.9%
 
Williams9.9%
 
Other8.0%
 


HancockBriggs32.6%
 
Parker47.9%
 
Williams10.0%
 
Other9.5%
 


HarrisonBriggs38.1%
 
Parker44.7%
 
Williams9.4%
 
Other7.8%
 


HindsBriggs19.4%
 
Parker52.6%
 
Williams15.6%
 
Other12.5%
 


HolmesBriggs27.0%
 
Parker34.9%
 
Williams15.9%
 
Other22.2%
 


HumphreysBriggs20.0%
 
Parker40.0%
 
Williams20.0%
 
Other20.0%
 


IssaquenaBriggs0.0%
 
Parker100.0%
 
Williams0.0%
 


ItawambaBriggs34.2%
 
Parker47.9%
 
Williams2.7%
 
Other15.1%
 


JacksonBriggs32.2%
 
Parker53.4%
 
Williams7.2%
 
Other7.1%
 


JasperBriggs17.8%
 
Parker69.0%
 
Williams3.1%
 
Other10.1%
 


JeffersonBriggs14.9%
 
Parker78.7%
 
Williams4.3%
 
Other2.1%
 


Jefferson DavisBriggs12.6%
 
Parker71.6%
 
Williams4.2%
 
Other11.6%
 


JonesBriggs17.9%
 
Parker73.4%
 
Williams3.6%
 
Other5.1%
 


KemperBriggs60.0%
 
Parker31.1%
 
Williams2.8%
 
Other6.1%
 


LafayetteBriggs27.2%
 
Parker52.9%
 
Williams11.5%
 
Other8.4%
 


LamarBriggs23.9%
 
Parker67.3%
 
Williams4.1%
 
Other4.6%
 


LauderdaleBriggs45.2%
 
Parker40.6%
 
Williams7.6%
 
Other6.6%
 


LawrenceBriggs6.4%
 
Parker83.0%
 
Williams4.3%
 
Other6.4%
 


LeakeBriggs32.3%
 
Parker49.0%
 
Williams8.0%
 
Other10.8%
 


LeeBriggs34.4%
 
Parker47.6%
 
Williams5.1%
 
Other12.9%
 


LefloreBriggs32.3%
 
Parker50.8%
 
Williams9.6%
 
Other7.3%
 


LincolnBriggs3.7%
 
Parker91.9%
 
Williams2.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


LowndesBriggs42.7%
 
Parker44.8%
 
Williams3.3%
 
Other9.2%
 


MadisonBriggs24.8%
 
Parker49.2%
 
Williams16.4%
 
Other9.6%
 


MarionBriggs16.5%
 
Parker76.8%
 
Williams2.4%
 
Other4.3%
 


MarshallBriggs18.5%
 
Parker42.5%
 
Williams11.8%
 
Other27.2%
 


MonroeBriggs35.5%
 
Parker49.0%
 
Williams6.5%
 
Other9.0%
 


MontgomeryBriggs14.7%
 
Parker75.0%
 
Williams7.4%
 
Other2.9%
 


NeshobaBriggs29.9%
 
Parker48.1%
 
Williams6.1%
 
Other15.9%
 


NewtonBriggs35.8%
 
Parker37.4%
 
Williams8.7%
 
Other18.1%
 


NoxubeeBriggs33.3%
 
Parker66.7%
 
Williams0.0%
 


OktibbehaBriggs53.9%
 
Parker11.3%
 
Williams11.9%
 
Other23.0%
 


PanolaBriggs22.6%
 
Parker52.4%
 
Williams17.2%
 
Other7.8%
 


Pearl RiverBriggs23.2%
 
Parker53.3%
 
Williams9.4%
 
Other14.1%
 


PerryBriggs22.5%
 
Parker60.0%
 
Williams5.0%
 
Other12.5%
 


PikeBriggs10.6%
 
Parker79.4%
 
Williams5.0%
 
Other5.0%
 


PontotocBriggs32.7%
 
Parker45.7%
 
Williams9.1%
 
Other12.6%
 


PrentissBriggs35.1%
 
Parker47.0%
 
Williams7.0%
 
Other10.8%
 


QuitmanBriggs10.0%
 
Parker70.0%
 
Williams10.0%
 
Other10.0%
 


RankinBriggs18.6%
 
Parker55.0%
 
Williams13.9%
 
Other12.6%
 


ScottBriggs18.5%
 
Parker48.4%
 
Williams11.3%
 
Other21.8%
 


SharkeyBriggs0.0%
 
Parker100.0%
 
Williams0.0%
 


SimpsonBriggs20.7%
 
Parker61.3%
 
Williams7.7%
 
Other10.3%
 


SmithBriggs21.5%
 
Parker50.5%
 
Williams7.5%
 
Other20.4%
 


StoneBriggs24.8%
 
Parker53.9%
 
Williams8.8%
 
Other12.4%
 


SunflowerBriggs25.8%
 
Parker45.2%
 
Williams25.8%
 
Other3.2%
 


TallahatchieBriggs25.6%
 
Parker56.4%
 
Williams7.7%
 
Other10.3%
 


TateBriggs9.0%
 
Parker22.1%
 
Williams51.2%
 
Other17.6%
 


TippahBriggs23.1%
 
Parker44.9%
 
Williams6.4%
 
Other25.6%
 


TishomingoBriggs25.8%
 
Parker52.3%
 
Williams3.1%
 
Other18.8%
 


TunicaBriggs100.0%
 
Parker0.0%
 
Williams0.0%
 


UnionBriggs43.0%
 
Parker35.9%
 
Williams6.3%
 
Other14.8%
 


WalthallBriggs11.8%
 
Parker73.1%
 
Williams6.5%
 
Other8.6%
 


WarrenBriggs37.2%
 
Parker49.3%
 
Williams7.5%
 
Other6.1%
 


WashingtonBriggs28.8%
 
Parker51.7%
 
Williams12.9%
 
Other6.6%
 


WayneBriggs32.7%
 
Parker46.7%
 
Williams9.5%
 
Other11.1%
 


WebsterBriggs24.1%
 
Parker55.5%
 
Williams0.7%
 
Other19.7%
 


WilkinsonBriggs15.8%
 
Parker63.2%
 
Williams0.0%
 
Other21.1%
 


WinstonBriggs15.8%
 
Parker47.8%
 
Williams4.3%
 
Other32.1%
 


YalobushaBriggs22.2%
 
Parker51.9%
 
Williams7.4%
 
Other18.5%
 


YazooBriggs33.1%
 
Parker38.5%
 
Williams15.2%
 
Other13.3%
 



National DataGraph for 1999 - Mississippi Results for 1999

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved