2000 Presidential General Election Data Graphs - Kansas

by County


Map

AllenGore37.0%
 
Bush58.6%
 
Nader2.8%
 
Other1.6%
 


AndersonGore38.2%
 
Bush57.0%
 
Nader2.7%
 
Other2.1%
 


AtchisonGore46.0%
 
Bush49.0%
 
Nader3.4%
 
Other1.7%
 


BarberGore25.5%
 
Bush70.3%
 
Nader2.9%
 
Other1.3%
 


BartonGore29.6%
 
Bush66.7%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other1.5%
 


BourbonGore35.1%
 
Bush61.1%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other1.4%
 


BrownGore32.2%
 
Bush63.6%
 
Nader2.6%
 
Other1.6%
 


ButlerGore32.2%
 
Bush63.7%
 
Nader2.4%
 
Other1.8%
 


ChaseGore29.7%
 
Bush64.4%
 
Nader4.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


ChautauquaGore23.6%
 
Bush71.6%
 
Nader1.9%
 
Other2.9%
 


CherokeeGore41.4%
 
Bush54.9%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


CheyenneGore20.3%
 
Bush76.0%
 
Nader2.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


ClarkGore23.2%
 
Bush73.4%
 
Nader2.7%
 
Other0.7%
 


ClayGore23.3%
 
Bush73.3%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


CloudGore29.2%
 
Bush64.8%
 
Nader4.7%
 
Other1.4%
 


CoffeyGore29.6%
 
Bush66.8%
 
Nader2.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


ComancheGore21.0%
 
Bush75.5%
 
Nader1.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


CowleyGore39.0%
 
Bush56.9%
 
Nader2.9%
 
Other1.3%
 


CrawfordGore47.1%
 
Bush47.6%
 
Nader4.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


DecaturGore24.1%
 
Bush71.3%
 
Nader2.9%
 
Other1.6%
 


DickinsonGore29.8%
 
Bush64.8%
 
Nader4.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


DoniphanGore31.1%
 
Bush64.4%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other2.1%
 


DouglasGore45.8%
 
Bush42.8%
 
Nader10.1%
 
Other1.2%
 


EdwardsGore28.6%
 
Bush67.9%
 
Nader2.1%
 
Other1.3%
 


ElkGore25.9%
 
Bush69.7%
 
Nader2.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


EllisGore35.2%
 
Bush58.4%
 
Nader4.9%
 
Other1.6%
 


EllsworthGore29.1%
 
Bush65.0%
 
Nader4.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


FinneyGore26.6%
 
Bush70.4%
 
Nader2.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


FordGore28.8%
 
Bush67.8%
 
Nader2.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


FranklinGore34.4%
 
Bush61.3%
 
Nader3.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


GearyGore38.7%
 
Bush57.9%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


GoveGore19.8%
 
Bush75.1%
 
Nader2.9%
 
Other2.2%
 


GrahamGore23.5%
 
Bush71.8%
 
Nader3.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


GrantGore23.9%
 
Bush74.4%
 
Nader1.4%
 
Other0.3%
 


GrayGore22.3%
 
Bush75.5%
 
Nader1.3%
 
Other0.9%
 


GreeleyGore17.8%
 
Bush78.2%
 
Nader3.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


GreenwoodGore28.8%
 
Bush67.2%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


HamiltonGore22.1%
 
Bush75.6%
 
Nader1.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


HarperGore28.4%
 
Bush68.0%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other1.1%
 


HarveyGore33.6%
 
Bush60.4%
 
Nader4.8%
 
Other1.2%
 


HaskellGore16.3%
 
Bush81.9%
 
Nader1.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


HodgemanGore19.9%
 
Bush76.7%
 
Nader1.9%
 
Other1.4%
 


JacksonGore37.9%
 
Bush57.2%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other2.6%
 


JeffersonGore38.1%
 
Bush56.2%
 
Nader4.1%
 
Other1.7%
 


JewellGore20.2%
 
Bush74.6%
 
Nader3.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


JohnsonGore36.4%
 
Bush59.7%
 
Nader3.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


KearnyGore22.3%
 
Bush75.5%
 
Nader1.1%
 
Other1.0%
 


KingmanGore26.0%
 
Bush70.2%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other1.5%
 


KiowaGore18.3%
 
Bush78.5%
 
Nader2.1%
 
Other1.1%
 


LabetteGore43.9%
 
Bush52.4%
 
Nader2.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


LaneGore22.2%
 
Bush74.7%
 
Nader2.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


LeavenworthGore41.8%
 
Bush54.1%
 
Nader2.9%
 
Other1.2%
 


LincolnGore24.8%
 
Bush68.5%
 
Nader5.2%
 
Other1.5%
 


LinnGore37.3%
 
Bush59.0%
 
Nader2.1%
 
Other1.6%
 


LoganGore16.5%
 
Bush77.9%
 
Nader3.5%
 
Other2.1%
 


LyonGore41.7%
 
Bush53.4%
 
Nader3.3%
 
Other1.6%
 


McPhersonGore26.3%
 
Bush68.2%
 
Nader4.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


MarionGore25.0%
 
Bush70.4%
 
Nader3.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


MarshallGore35.8%
 
Bush59.9%
 
Nader2.6%
 
Other1.6%
 


MeadeGore19.5%
 
Bush78.1%
 
Nader1.6%
 
Other0.8%
 


MiamiGore39.2%
 
Bush57.0%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


MitchellGore23.0%
 
Bush72.0%
 
Nader3.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


MontgomeryGore34.7%
 
Bush61.8%
 
Nader2.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


MorrisGore33.4%
 
Bush60.5%
 
Nader3.9%
 
Other2.1%
 


MortonGore20.6%
 
Bush77.3%
 
Nader1.2%
 
Other0.9%
 


NemahaGore28.2%
 
Bush67.6%
 
Nader1.9%
 
Other2.2%
 


NeoshoGore37.6%
 
Bush58.3%
 
Nader2.8%
 
Other1.3%
 


NessGore20.4%
 
Bush75.7%
 
Nader2.6%
 
Other1.3%
 


NortonGore24.4%
 
Bush71.2%
 
Nader2.7%
 
Other1.8%
 


OsageGore38.3%
 
Bush57.0%
 
Nader2.6%
 
Other2.1%
 


OsborneGore23.8%
 
Bush70.5%
 
Nader3.6%
 
Other2.0%
 


OttawaGore22.6%
 
Bush70.8%
 
Nader5.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


PawneeGore32.9%
 
Bush62.9%
 
Nader3.2%
 
Other1.0%
 


PhillipsGore21.9%
 
Bush73.7%
 
Nader3.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


PottawatomieGore26.3%
 
Bush64.5%
 
Nader3.3%
 
Other5.9%
 


PrattGore29.8%
 
Bush65.3%
 
Nader3.4%
 
Other1.5%
 


RawlinsGore17.6%
 
Bush77.5%
 
Nader2.8%
 
Other2.1%
 


RenoGore35.5%
 
Bush59.7%
 
Nader3.4%
 
Other1.4%
 


RepublicGore20.2%
 
Bush75.0%
 
Nader3.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


RiceGore31.5%
 
Bush64.2%
 
Nader2.8%
 
Other1.5%
 


RileyGore33.9%
 
Bush58.5%
 
Nader6.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


RooksGore21.5%
 
Bush72.6%
 
Nader3.8%
 
Other2.1%
 


RushGore27.2%
 
Bush66.6%
 
Nader4.4%
 
Other1.7%
 


RussellGore25.4%
 
Bush69.9%
 
Nader3.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


SalineGore34.8%
 
Bush57.7%
 
Nader6.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


ScottGore18.2%
 
Bush78.6%
 
Nader2.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


SedgwickGore38.3%
 
Bush57.4%
 
Nader2.9%
 
Other1.5%
 


SewardGore22.1%
 
Bush75.9%
 
Nader1.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


ShawneeGore46.8%
 
Bush48.3%
 
Nader3.4%
 
Other1.5%
 


SheridanGore18.9%
 
Bush76.0%
 
Nader3.7%
 
Other1.4%
 


ShermanGore25.4%
 
Bush70.6%
 
Nader2.2%
 
Other1.8%
 


SmithGore24.5%
 
Bush70.2%
 
Nader3.6%
 
Other1.7%
 


StaffordGore25.8%
 
Bush70.3%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


StantonGore20.9%
 
Bush76.3%
 
Nader1.6%
 
Other1.3%
 


StevensGore16.3%
 
Bush81.2%
 
Nader1.6%
 
Other0.9%
 


SumnerGore34.7%
 
Bush60.4%
 
Nader3.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


ThomasGore21.3%
 
Bush74.7%
 
Nader2.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


TregoGore28.1%
 
Bush66.4%
 
Nader3.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


WabaunseeGore30.0%
 
Bush63.8%
 
Nader2.8%
 
Other3.4%
 


WallaceGore12.0%
 
Bush85.6%
 
Nader1.6%
 
Other0.8%
 


WashingtonGore21.0%
 
Bush74.9%
 
Nader2.4%
 
Other1.7%
 


WichitaGore19.0%
 
Bush78.8%
 
Nader1.4%
 
Other0.8%
 


WilsonGore29.0%
 
Bush67.1%
 
Nader2.4%
 
Other1.5%
 


WoodsonGore32.7%
 
Bush61.1%
 
Nader3.7%
 
Other2.6%
 


WyandotteGore67.1%
 
Bush29.1%
 
Nader2.7%
 
Other1.1%
 



National DataGraph for 2000 - Kansas Results for 2000

Login

© David Leip 2016 All Rights Reserved

Note: The advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.