Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Beaverhead	Schweitzer	29.7%
	Burns	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Big Horn	Schweitzer	62.8%
	Burns	35.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Blaine	Schweitzer	53.7%
	Burns	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Broadwater	Schweitzer	34.9%
	Burns	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Carbon	Schweitzer	43.8%
	Burns	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Carter	Schweitzer	9.7%
	Burns	89.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Cascade	Schweitzer	51.8%
	Burns	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Chouteau	Schweitzer	34.5%
	Burns	63.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Custer	Schweitzer	42.9%
	Burns	54.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Daniels	Schweitzer	33.5%
	Burns	64.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Dawson	Schweitzer	39.8%
	Burns	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Deer Lodge	Schweitzer	72.8%
	Burns	25.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Fallon	Schweitzer	26.9%
	Burns	71.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Fergus	Schweitzer	34.2%
	Burns	63.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Flathead	Schweitzer	39.7%
	Burns	57.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Gallatin	Schweitzer	45.5%
	Burns	52.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Garfield	Schweitzer	18.3%
	Burns	79.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Glacier	Schweitzer	63.8%
	Burns	33.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Golden Valley	Schweitzer	30.4%
	Burns	66.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Granite	Schweitzer	34.7%
	Burns	63.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Hill	Schweitzer	56.1%
	Burns	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Jefferson	Schweitzer	44.2%
	Burns	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Judith Basin	Schweitzer	34.0%
	Burns	64.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Lake	Schweitzer	47.8%
	Burns	49.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Lewis and Clark	Schweitzer	53.1%
	Burns	45.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Liberty	Schweitzer	37.2%
	Burns	61.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Lincoln	Schweitzer	33.4%
	Burns	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

McCone	Schweitzer	31.2%
	Burns	67.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Madison	Schweitzer	33.0%
	Burns	65.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Meagher	Schweitzer	28.7%
	Burns	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Mineral	Schweitzer	40.6%
	Burns	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Missoula	Schweitzer	59.2%
	Burns	38.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Musselshell	Schweitzer	33.2%
	Burns	64.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Park	Schweitzer	43.5%
	Burns	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Petroleum	Schweitzer	20.3%
	Burns	77.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Phillips	Schweitzer	28.3%
	Burns	70.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Pondera	Schweitzer	43.1%
	Burns	54.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Powder River	Schweitzer	17.8%
	Burns	80.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Powell	Schweitzer	36.8%
	Burns	61.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Prairie	Schweitzer	30.7%
	Burns	67.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Ravalli	Schweitzer	40.5%
	Burns	56.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Richland	Schweitzer	30.1%
	Burns	67.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Roosevelt	Schweitzer	55.5%
	Burns	42.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Rosebud	Schweitzer	52.4%
	Burns	44.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Sanders	Schweitzer	38.4%
	Burns	59.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Sheridan	Schweitzer	43.7%
	Burns	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Silver Bow	Schweitzer	67.0%
	Burns	31.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Stillwater	Schweitzer	37.9%
	Burns	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Sweet Grass	Schweitzer	23.5%
	Burns	74.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Teton	Schweitzer	37.7%
	Burns	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Toole	Schweitzer	42.1%
	Burns	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Treasure	Schweitzer	38.6%
	Burns	58.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Valley	Schweitzer	43.6%
	Burns	54.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Wheatland	Schweitzer	33.6%
	Burns	64.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Wibaux	Schweitzer	36.2%
	Burns	61.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Yellowstone	Schweitzer	46.7%
	Burns	51.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

National DataGraph for 2000 - Montana Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved