Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Easley	46.9%
	Vinroot	51.6%
	Other	1.5%

Alexander	Easley	39.0%
	Vinroot	59.6%
	Other	1.4%

Alleghany	Easley	53.2%
	Vinroot	44.9%
	Other	1.9%

Anson	Easley	67.9%
	Vinroot	30.8%
	Other	1.4%

Ashe	Easley	46.0%
	Vinroot	52.3%
	Other	1.8%

Avery	Easley	32.6%
	Vinroot	64.7%
	Other	2.8%

Beaufort	Easley	51.4%
	Vinroot	47.6%
	Other	1.1%

Bertie	Easley	76.3%
	Vinroot	23.0%
	Other	0.7%

Bladen	Easley	70.4%
	Vinroot	28.5%
	Other	1.1%

Brunswick	Easley	57.7%
	Vinroot	40.4%
	Other	1.9%

Buncombe	Easley	50.5%
	Vinroot	46.3%
	Other	3.2%

Burke	Easley	46.3%
	Vinroot	52.0%
	Other	1.7%

Cabarrus	Easley	39.0%
	Vinroot	59.1%
	Other	1.9%

Caldwell	Easley	41.2%
	Vinroot	56.2%
	Other	2.5%

Camden	Easley	57.7%
	Vinroot	39.9%
	Other	2.3%

Carteret	Easley	45.8%
	Vinroot	52.6%
	Other	1.7%

Caswell	Easley	59.1%
	Vinroot	39.8%
	Other	1.1%

Catawba	Easley	38.8%
	Vinroot	59.4%
	Other	1.8%

Chatham	Easley	57.4%
	Vinroot	40.6%
	Other	1.9%

Cherokee	Easley	41.8%
	Vinroot	56.6%
	Other	1.6%

Chowan	Easley	63.5%
	Vinroot	34.0%
	Other	2.6%

Clay	Easley	40.6%
	Vinroot	56.9%
	Other	2.6%

Cleveland	Easley	51.8%
	Vinroot	46.9%
	Other	1.3%

Columbus	Easley	72.5%
	Vinroot	26.3%
	Other	1.2%

Craven	Easley	50.0%
	Vinroot	48.6%
	Other	1.4%

Cumberland	Easley	59.1%
	Vinroot	39.4%
	Other	1.5%

Currituck	Easley	50.7%
	Vinroot	46.0%
	Other	3.3%

Dare	Easley	57.9%
	Vinroot	39.6%
	Other	2.5%

Davidson	Easley	43.3%
	Vinroot	55.0%
	Other	1.6%

Davie	Easley	37.5%
	Vinroot	60.2%
	Other	2.3%

Duplin	Easley	56.9%
	Vinroot	42.2%
	Other	0.9%

Durham	Easley	69.2%
	Vinroot	29.3%
	Other	1.5%

Edgecombe	Easley	73.5%
	Vinroot	26.0%
	Other	0.5%

Forsyth	Easley	51.7%
	Vinroot	46.5%
	Other	1.8%

Franklin	Easley	58.6%
	Vinroot	40.1%
	Other	1.3%

Gaston	Easley	39.5%
	Vinroot	58.8%
	Other	1.7%

Gates	Easley	70.3%
	Vinroot	27.7%
	Other	2.0%

Graham	Easley	43.2%
	Vinroot	55.0%
	Other	1.8%

Granville	Easley	63.3%
	Vinroot	35.6%
	Other	1.1%

Greene	Easley	59.2%
	Vinroot	40.1%
	Other	0.7%

Guilford	Easley	56.2%
	Vinroot	42.2%
	Other	1.7%

Halifax	Easley	71.4%
	Vinroot	27.7%
	Other	0.9%

Harnett	Easley	52.9%
	Vinroot	45.7%
	Other	1.4%

Haywood	Easley	55.1%
	Vinroot	42.7%
	Other	2.2%

Henderson	Easley	38.9%
	Vinroot	59.2%
	Other	1.9%

Hertford	Easley	79.0%
	Vinroot	20.2%
	Other	0.8%

Hoke	Easley	69.1%
	Vinroot	29.4%
	Other	1.5%

Hyde	Easley	63.6%
	Vinroot	35.3%
	Other	1.1%

Iredell	Easley	40.6%
	Vinroot	57.7%
	Other	1.7%

Jackson	Easley	54.6%
	Vinroot	42.9%
	Other	2.4%

Johnston	Easley	50.6%
	Vinroot	47.9%
	Other	1.5%

Jones	Easley	57.7%
	Vinroot	41.4%
	Other	0.8%

Lee	Easley	54.3%
	Vinroot	44.3%
	Other	1.3%

Lenoir	Easley	59.8%
	Vinroot	39.7%
	Other	0.6%

Lincoln	Easley	42.0%
	Vinroot	56.2%
	Other	1.8%

McDowell	Easley	45.9%
	Vinroot	52.1%
	Other	2.0%

Macon	Easley	44.1%
	Vinroot	53.8%
	Other	2.1%

Madison	Easley	52.5%
	Vinroot	45.2%
	Other	2.3%

Martin	Easley	68.2%
	Vinroot	31.2%
	Other	0.6%

Mecklenburg	Easley	47.9%
	Vinroot	50.6%
	Other	1.5%

Mitchell	Easley	29.7%
	Vinroot	68.3%
	Other	2.0%

Montgomery	Easley	56.6%
	Vinroot	42.0%
	Other	1.4%

Moore	Easley	43.8%
	Vinroot	55.4%
	Other	0.9%

Nash	Easley	58.1%
	Vinroot	41.2%
	Other	0.7%

New Hanover	Easley	55.6%
	Vinroot	42.1%
	Other	2.3%

Northampton	Easley	77.4%
	Vinroot	21.6%
	Other	1.0%

Onslow	Easley	45.0%
	Vinroot	52.2%
	Other	2.9%

Orange	Easley	67.0%
	Vinroot	30.7%
	Other	2.3%

Pamlico	Easley	54.3%
	Vinroot	44.3%
	Other	1.4%

Pasquotank	Easley	65.0%
	Vinroot	33.2%
	Other	1.8%

Pender	Easley	56.1%
	Vinroot	42.4%
	Other	1.5%

Perquimans	Easley	61.5%
	Vinroot	36.5%
	Other	2.0%

Person	Easley	56.6%
	Vinroot	42.2%
	Other	1.2%

Pitt	Easley	59.7%
	Vinroot	39.4%
	Other	0.9%

Polk	Easley	43.4%
	Vinroot	53.6%
	Other	3.0%

Randolph	Easley	37.9%
	Vinroot	60.6%
	Other	1.5%

Richmond	Easley	61.4%
	Vinroot	29.0%
	Other	9.5%

Robeson	Easley	74.4%
	Vinroot	24.2%
	Other	1.4%

Rockingham	Easley	53.5%
	Vinroot	44.8%
	Other	1.8%

Rowan	Easley	41.9%
	Vinroot	56.1%
	Other	2.0%

Rutherford	Easley	47.6%
	Vinroot	50.2%
	Other	2.2%

Sampson	Easley	56.0%
	Vinroot	43.2%
	Other	0.8%

Scotland	Easley	70.3%
	Vinroot	28.6%
	Other	1.1%

Stanly	Easley	40.7%
	Vinroot	57.7%
	Other	1.6%

Stokes	Easley	42.5%
	Vinroot	55.9%
	Other	1.6%

Surry	Easley	44.8%
	Vinroot	54.0%
	Other	1.2%

Swain	Easley	55.7%
	Vinroot	42.4%
	Other	1.9%

Transylvania	Easley	39.1%
	Vinroot	57.9%
	Other	3.0%

Tyrrell	Easley	73.0%
	Vinroot	26.3%
	Other	0.7%

Union	Easley	36.4%
	Vinroot	61.9%
	Other	1.8%

Vance	Easley	67.7%
	Vinroot	31.7%
	Other	0.6%

Wake	Easley	55.1%
	Vinroot	43.1%
	Other	1.8%

Warren	Easley	73.4%
	Vinroot	25.8%
	Other	0.8%

Washington	Easley	68.3%
	Vinroot	30.6%
	Other	1.1%

Watauga	Easley	48.4%
	Vinroot	47.6%
	Other	4.0%

Wayne	Easley	50.8%
	Vinroot	48.2%
	Other	1.0%

Wilkes	Easley	41.3%
	Vinroot	57.2%
	Other	1.5%

Wilson	Easley	60.9%
	Vinroot	38.3%
	Other	0.8%

Yadkin	Easley	35.7%
	Vinroot	62.6%
	Other	1.7%

Yancey	Easley	50.6%
	Vinroot	47.7%
	Other	1.7%

National DataGraph for 2000 - North Carolina Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved