Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-12

Map

Map

Alamance	Easley	54.2%
	Wicker	40.9%
	Other	4.8%

Alexander	Easley	40.8%
	Wicker	55.0%
	Other	4.2%

Alleghany	Easley	49.1%
	Wicker	44.8%
	Other	6.2%

Anson	Easley	54.3%
	Wicker	40.1%
	Other	5.5%

Ashe	Easley	49.7%
	Wicker	44.9%
	Other	5.4%

Avery	Easley	47.2%
	Wicker	43.6%
	Other	9.3%

Beaufort	Easley	62.3%
	Wicker	31.2%
	Other	6.5%

Bertie	Easley	51.1%
	Wicker	41.1%
	Other	7.8%

Bladen	Easley	71.9%
	Wicker	23.5%
	Other	4.6%

Brunswick	Easley	72.6%
	Wicker	23.3%
	Other	4.1%

Buncombe	Easley	51.8%
	Wicker	42.6%
	Other	5.6%

Burke	Easley	52.7%
	Wicker	43.2%
	Other	4.1%

Cabarrus	Easley	57.7%
	Wicker	37.6%
	Other	4.7%

Caldwell	Easley	41.3%
	Wicker	54.2%
	Other	4.4%

Camden	Easley	61.6%
	Wicker	21.2%
	Other	17.2%

Carteret	Easley	59.2%
	Wicker	35.4%
	Other	5.4%

Caswell	Easley	58.8%
	Wicker	31.9%
	Other	9.3%

Catawba	Easley	47.8%
	Wicker	46.0%
	Other	6.2%

Chatham	Easley	49.7%
	Wicker	39.4%
	Other	10.9%

Cherokee	Easley	39.0%
	Wicker	45.2%
	Other	15.8%

Chowan	Easley	57.7%
	Wicker	36.8%
	Other	5.5%

Clay	Easley	39.3%
	Wicker	43.3%
	Other	17.4%

Cleveland	Easley	56.0%
	Wicker	37.9%
	Other	6.1%

Columbus	Easley	65.0%
	Wicker	32.1%
	Other	2.9%

Craven	Easley	56.2%
	Wicker	38.4%
	Other	5.4%

Cumberland	Easley	62.0%
	Wicker	34.4%
	Other	3.6%

Currituck	Easley	58.0%
	Wicker	24.5%
	Other	17.5%

Dare	Easley	65.3%
	Wicker	26.9%
	Other	7.8%

Davidson	Easley	55.1%
	Wicker	39.8%
	Other	5.1%

Davie	Easley	56.0%
	Wicker	37.0%
	Other	7.0%

Duplin	Easley	62.3%
	Wicker	29.8%
	Other	7.9%

Durham	Easley	53.1%
	Wicker	44.3%
	Other	2.6%

Edgecombe	Easley	69.4%
	Wicker	27.8%
	Other	2.8%

Forsyth	Easley	58.2%
	Wicker	37.7%
	Other	4.2%

Franklin	Easley	69.9%
	Wicker	25.3%
	Other	4.8%

Gaston	Easley	56.3%
	Wicker	38.5%
	Other	5.3%

Gates	Easley	49.7%
	Wicker	26.2%
	Other	24.1%

Graham	Easley	64.0%
	Wicker	26.6%
	Other	9.4%

Granville	Easley	65.0%
	Wicker	30.5%
	Other	4.6%

Greene	Easley	65.5%
	Wicker	27.5%
	Other	7.0%

Guilford	Easley	54.9%
	Wicker	41.2%
	Other	4.0%

Halifax	Easley	63.5%
	Wicker	31.8%
	Other	4.7%

Harnett	Easley	50.5%
	Wicker	44.9%
	Other	4.6%

Haywood	Easley	59.1%
	Wicker	36.5%
	Other	4.5%

Henderson	Easley	56.0%
	Wicker	37.7%
	Other	6.3%

Hertford	Easley	46.3%
	Wicker	44.3%
	Other	9.4%

Hoke	Easley	59.8%
	Wicker	33.7%
	Other	6.4%

Hyde	Easley	64.9%
	Wicker	26.1%
	Other	9.0%

Iredell	Easley	57.0%
	Wicker	36.9%
	Other	6.0%

Jackson	Easley	44.7%
	Wicker	51.1%
	Other	4.2%

Johnston	Easley	64.2%
	Wicker	30.1%
	Other	5.8%

Jones	Easley	50.8%
	Wicker	41.9%
	Other	7.3%

Lee	Easley	26.5%
	Wicker	72.3%
	Other	1.1%

Lenoir	Easley	60.2%
	Wicker	33.8%
	Other	6.0%

Lincoln	Easley	57.2%
	Wicker	38.2%
	Other	4.6%

McDowell	Easley	52.0%
	Wicker	39.0%
	Other	9.0%

Macon	Easley	42.9%
	Wicker	49.4%
	Other	7.7%

Madison	Easley	52.2%
	Wicker	42.1%
	Other	5.7%

Martin	Easley	63.1%
	Wicker	33.4%
	Other	3.5%

Mecklenburg	Easley	54.4%
	Wicker	42.0%
	Other	3.6%

Mitchell	Easley	51.1%
	Wicker	42.2%
	Other	6.7%

Montgomery	Easley	56.3%
	Wicker	38.9%
	Other	4.8%

Moore	Easley	52.4%
	Wicker	44.4%
	Other	3.3%

Nash	Easley	82.8%
	Wicker	14.3%
	Other	2.9%

New Hanover	Easley	67.5%
	Wicker	29.7%
	Other	2.8%

Northampton	Easley	64.4%
	Wicker	30.8%
	Other	4.7%

Onslow	Easley	54.1%
	Wicker	39.0%
	Other	6.8%

Orange	Easley	58.4%
	Wicker	37.9%
	Other	3.7%

Pamlico	Easley	67.1%
	Wicker	24.5%
	Other	8.4%

Pasquotank	Easley	66.0%
	Wicker	24.6%
	Other	9.5%

Pender	Easley	62.8%
	Wicker	32.6%
	Other	4.6%

Perquimans	Easley	53.3%
	Wicker	33.8%
	Other	12.9%

Person	Easley	69.7%
	Wicker	24.2%
	Other	6.1%

Pitt	Easley	71.3%
	Wicker	24.7%
	Other	4.0%

Polk	Easley	39.5%
	Wicker	48.1%
	Other	12.4%

Randolph	Easley	57.9%
	Wicker	38.0%
	Other	4.1%

Richmond	Easley	56.8%
	Wicker	36.9%
	Other	6.3%

Robeson	Easley	59.5%
	Wicker	36.1%
	Other	4.4%

Rockingham	Easley	65.0%
	Wicker	30.6%
	Other	4.4%

Rowan	Easley	57.1%
	Wicker	36.9%
	Other	6.0%

Rutherford	Easley	48.7%
	Wicker	44.7%
	Other	6.6%

Sampson	Easley	62.4%
	Wicker	31.6%
	Other	6.0%

Scotland	Easley	51.3%
	Wicker	45.7%
	Other	3.0%

Stanly	Easley	56.5%
	Wicker	37.1%
	Other	6.4%

Stokes	Easley	56.3%
	Wicker	39.1%
	Other	4.7%

Surry	Easley	47.6%
	Wicker	46.2%
	Other	6.2%

Swain	Easley	44.5%
	Wicker	49.0%
	Other	6.5%

Transylvania	Easley	43.0%
	Wicker	49.6%
	Other	7.4%

Tyrrell	Easley	75.4%
	Wicker	15.3%
	Other	9.3%

Union	Easley	54.7%
	Wicker	40.3%
	Other	5.0%

Vance	Easley	78.4%
	Wicker	15.7%
	Other	5.9%

Wake	Easley	62.6%
	Wicker	34.3%
	Other	3.1%

Warren	Easley	80.8%
	Wicker	13.5%
	Other	5.7%

Washington	Easley	78.4%
	Wicker	15.5%
	Other	6.1%

Watauga	Easley	45.6%
	Wicker	48.3%
	Other	6.1%

Wayne	Easley	66.0%
	Wicker	28.5%
	Other	5.5%

Wilkes	Easley	54.5%
	Wicker	41.9%
	Other	3.6%

Wilson	Easley	63.1%
	Wicker	33.4%
	Other	3.5%

Yadkin	Easley	55.0%
	Wicker	39.6%
	Other	5.5%

Yancey	Easley	41.0%
	Wicker	52.0%
	Other	6.9%

National DataGraph for 2000 - North Carolina Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved