Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-02-07

Map

Map

Autauga	Chapman	28.5%
	Zeigler	40.8%
	Duncan	21.5%
	Other	9.1%

Baldwin	Chapman	29.5%
	Zeigler	46.8%
	Duncan	12.8%
	Other	11.0%

Barbour	Chapman	27.7%
	Zeigler	51.9%
	Duncan	17.7%
	Other	2.6%

Bibb	Chapman	26.3%
	Zeigler	43.9%
	Duncan	21.9%
	Other	7.9%

Blount	Chapman	25.3%
	Zeigler	45.8%
	Duncan	19.7%
	Other	9.1%

Bullock	Chapman	42.9%
	Zeigler	22.4%
	Duncan	22.4%
	Other	12.2%

Butler	Chapman	67.6%
	Zeigler	19.5%
	Duncan	7.1%
	Other	5.9%

Calhoun	Chapman	25.6%
	Zeigler	47.4%
	Duncan	19.8%
	Other	7.2%

Chambers	Chapman	23.2%
	Zeigler	50.3%
	Duncan	19.6%
	Other	7.0%

Cherokee	Chapman	33.2%
	Zeigler	42.8%
	Duncan	17.1%
	Other	7.0%

Chilton	Chapman	24.8%
	Zeigler	48.1%
	Duncan	19.0%
	Other	8.1%

Choctaw	Chapman	11.8%
	Zeigler	56.9%
	Duncan	19.6%
	Other	11.8%

Clarke	Chapman	20.4%
	Zeigler	54.5%
	Duncan	17.2%
	Other	7.9%

Clay	Chapman	22.4%
	Zeigler	52.5%
	Duncan	15.8%
	Other	9.2%

Cleburne	Chapman	19.8%
	Zeigler	48.9%
	Duncan	20.0%
	Other	11.4%

Coffee	Chapman	22.2%
	Zeigler	52.2%
	Duncan	16.8%
	Other	8.8%

Colbert	Chapman	20.1%
	Zeigler	50.6%
	Duncan	18.7%
	Other	10.6%

Conecuh	Chapman	27.7%
	Zeigler	45.1%
	Duncan	23.1%
	Other	4.0%

Coosa	Chapman	22.4%
	Zeigler	52.2%
	Duncan	19.1%
	Other	6.3%

Covington	Chapman	24.6%
	Zeigler	49.1%
	Duncan	15.4%
	Other	10.9%

Crenshaw	Chapman	33.9%
	Zeigler	47.3%
	Duncan	13.9%
	Other	4.9%

Cullman	Chapman	23.2%
	Zeigler	48.6%
	Duncan	18.8%
	Other	9.4%

Dale	Chapman	21.6%
	Zeigler	54.1%
	Duncan	16.3%
	Other	7.9%

Dallas	Chapman	25.7%
	Zeigler	47.5%
	Duncan	16.0%
	Other	10.8%

DeKalb	Chapman	25.2%
	Zeigler	41.2%
	Duncan	22.6%
	Other	11.0%

Elmore	Chapman	27.6%
	Zeigler	39.5%
	Duncan	23.5%
	Other	9.4%

Escambia	Chapman	33.1%
	Zeigler	43.4%
	Duncan	16.8%
	Other	6.8%

Etowah	Chapman	26.6%
	Zeigler	47.2%
	Duncan	17.1%
	Other	9.1%

Fayette	Chapman	19.5%
	Zeigler	41.9%
	Duncan	26.9%
	Other	11.7%

Franklin	Chapman	24.0%
	Zeigler	49.2%
	Duncan	17.5%
	Other	9.2%

Geneva	Chapman	20.7%
	Zeigler	57.1%
	Duncan	16.6%
	Other	5.6%

Greene	Chapman	11.1%
	Zeigler	59.3%
	Duncan	22.2%
	Other	7.4%

Hale	Chapman	25.6%
	Zeigler	48.7%
	Duncan	19.2%
	Other	6.4%

Henry	Chapman	31.0%
	Zeigler	44.3%
	Duncan	17.7%
	Other	7.0%

Houston	Chapman	25.5%
	Zeigler	49.8%
	Duncan	17.2%
	Other	7.5%

Jackson	Chapman	20.1%
	Zeigler	46.5%
	Duncan	25.6%
	Other	7.8%

Jefferson	Chapman	34.3%
	Zeigler	38.0%
	Duncan	16.4%
	Other	11.3%

Lamar	Chapman	23.8%
	Zeigler	47.6%
	Duncan	23.8%
	Other	4.8%

Lauderdale	Chapman	21.8%
	Zeigler	45.7%
	Duncan	19.9%
	Other	12.6%

Lawrence	Chapman	20.8%
	Zeigler	49.1%
	Duncan	20.2%
	Other	9.9%

Lee	Chapman	22.5%
	Zeigler	39.6%
	Duncan	29.2%
	Other	8.7%

Limestone	Chapman	23.2%
	Zeigler	48.5%
	Duncan	20.1%
	Other	8.1%

Lowndes	Chapman	26.4%
	Zeigler	37.0%
	Duncan	26.4%
	Other	10.2%

Macon	Chapman	21.0%
	Zeigler	47.3%
	Duncan	22.3%
	Other	9.4%

Madison	Chapman	28.8%
	Zeigler	39.0%
	Duncan	19.6%
	Other	12.6%

Marengo	Chapman	24.6%
	Zeigler	53.2%
	Duncan	15.4%
	Other	6.7%

Marion	Chapman	22.8%
	Zeigler	44.4%
	Duncan	21.4%
	Other	11.3%

Marshall	Chapman	21.8%
	Zeigler	42.5%
	Duncan	17.9%
	Other	17.9%

Mobile	Chapman	30.9%
	Zeigler	48.4%
	Duncan	9.9%
	Other	10.8%

Monroe	Chapman	35.2%
	Zeigler	46.3%
	Duncan	14.2%
	Other	4.3%

Montgomery	Chapman	24.4%
	Zeigler	32.1%
	Duncan	27.7%
	Other	15.8%

Morgan	Chapman	21.4%
	Zeigler	42.4%
	Duncan	28.4%
	Other	7.8%

Perry	Chapman	16.5%
	Zeigler	49.4%
	Duncan	25.9%
	Other	8.2%

Pickens	Chapman	23.0%
	Zeigler	50.3%
	Duncan	18.7%
	Other	8.0%

Pike	Chapman	20.9%
	Zeigler	47.8%
	Duncan	21.5%
	Other	9.7%

Randolph	Chapman	23.5%
	Zeigler	47.5%
	Duncan	20.9%
	Other	8.1%

Russell	Chapman	24.8%
	Zeigler	47.1%
	Duncan	21.3%
	Other	6.8%

St. Clair	Chapman	25.8%
	Zeigler	47.2%
	Duncan	17.0%
	Other	10.1%

Shelby	Chapman	41.9%
	Zeigler	31.5%
	Duncan	16.7%
	Other	9.9%

Sumter	Chapman	22.2%
	Zeigler	48.1%
	Duncan	25.9%
	Other	3.7%

Talladega	Chapman	19.4%
	Zeigler	55.9%
	Duncan	18.3%
	Other	6.4%

Tallapoosa	Chapman	24.1%
	Zeigler	49.0%
	Duncan	19.0%
	Other	7.9%

Tuscaloosa	Chapman	23.0%
	Zeigler	45.2%
	Duncan	19.0%
	Other	12.8%

Walker	Chapman	22.5%
	Zeigler	48.4%
	Duncan	20.8%
	Other	8.3%

Washington	Chapman	28.5%
	Zeigler	53.6%
	Duncan	14.4%
	Other	3.4%

Wilcox	Chapman	31.0%
	Zeigler	40.5%
	Duncan	20.8%
	Other	7.7%

Winston	Chapman	20.5%
	Zeigler	47.9%
	Duncan	21.3%
	Other	10.3%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Alabama Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved