2002 Secretary of State General Election Data Graphs - Kansas
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-05-21

Map

AllenHaley29.6%
 
Thornburgh67.6%
 
Other2.8%
 


AndersonHaley33.0%
 
Thornburgh63.9%
 
Other3.2%
 


AtchisonHaley41.8%
 
Thornburgh55.2%
 
Other3.1%
 


BarberHaley25.5%
 
Thornburgh71.1%
 
Other3.4%
 


BartonHaley23.5%
 
Thornburgh73.7%
 
Other2.8%
 


BourbonHaley35.3%
 
Thornburgh62.1%
 
Other2.6%
 


BrownHaley21.8%
 
Thornburgh75.5%
 
Other2.7%
 


ButlerHaley29.8%
 
Thornburgh66.5%
 
Other3.8%
 


ChaseHaley22.7%
 
Thornburgh74.4%
 
Other2.9%
 


ChautauquaHaley21.2%
 
Thornburgh75.1%
 
Other3.7%
 


CherokeeHaley42.4%
 
Thornburgh54.5%
 
Other3.1%
 


CheyenneHaley17.5%
 
Thornburgh79.5%
 
Other3.0%
 


ClarkHaley21.2%
 
Thornburgh74.8%
 
Other3.9%
 


ClayHaley14.8%
 
Thornburgh83.5%
 
Other1.6%
 


CloudHaley23.3%
 
Thornburgh73.7%
 
Other3.0%
 


CoffeyHaley18.9%
 
Thornburgh78.8%
 
Other2.3%
 


ComancheHaley19.8%
 
Thornburgh77.4%
 
Other2.8%
 


CowleyHaley35.8%
 
Thornburgh61.1%
 
Other3.1%
 


CrawfordHaley46.0%
 
Thornburgh51.5%
 
Other2.5%
 


DecaturHaley19.4%
 
Thornburgh77.8%
 
Other2.8%
 


DickinsonHaley23.3%
 
Thornburgh73.9%
 
Other2.8%
 


DoniphanHaley25.6%
 
Thornburgh71.2%
 
Other3.2%
 


DouglasHaley47.8%
 
Thornburgh49.7%
 
Other2.6%
 


EdwardsHaley20.9%
 
Thornburgh74.5%
 
Other4.6%
 


ElkHaley26.4%
 
Thornburgh70.2%
 
Other3.5%
 


EllisHaley33.4%
 
Thornburgh63.5%
 
Other3.1%
 


EllsworthHaley26.4%
 
Thornburgh70.9%
 
Other2.6%
 


FinneyHaley22.7%
 
Thornburgh74.7%
 
Other2.6%
 


FordHaley22.5%
 
Thornburgh74.5%
 
Other3.1%
 


FranklinHaley30.5%
 
Thornburgh67.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


GearyHaley30.9%
 
Thornburgh66.8%
 
Other2.3%
 


GoveHaley16.6%
 
Thornburgh80.6%
 
Other2.8%
 


GrahamHaley19.8%
 
Thornburgh75.8%
 
Other4.5%
 


GrantHaley18.9%
 
Thornburgh78.5%
 
Other2.6%
 


GrayHaley17.6%
 
Thornburgh80.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


GreeleyHaley14.3%
 
Thornburgh82.6%
 
Other3.1%
 


GreenwoodHaley24.7%
 
Thornburgh72.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


HamiltonHaley16.9%
 
Thornburgh80.9%
 
Other2.2%
 


HarperHaley27.9%
 
Thornburgh69.4%
 
Other2.8%
 


HarveyHaley29.7%
 
Thornburgh67.5%
 
Other2.9%
 


HaskellHaley14.1%
 
Thornburgh83.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


HodgemanHaley13.4%
 
Thornburgh84.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


JacksonHaley23.1%
 
Thornburgh72.7%
 
Other4.3%
 


JeffersonHaley29.4%
 
Thornburgh67.7%
 
Other2.9%
 


JewellHaley17.0%
 
Thornburgh79.6%
 
Other3.4%
 


JohnsonHaley30.8%
 
Thornburgh67.4%
 
Other1.8%
 


KearnyHaley18.5%
 
Thornburgh80.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


KingmanHaley23.0%
 
Thornburgh73.4%
 
Other3.5%
 


KiowaHaley16.4%
 
Thornburgh80.9%
 
Other2.7%
 


LabetteHaley35.2%
 
Thornburgh62.1%
 
Other2.6%
 


LaneHaley12.7%
 
Thornburgh83.9%
 
Other3.3%
 


LeavenworthHaley38.9%
 
Thornburgh58.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


LincolnHaley19.8%
 
Thornburgh76.4%
 
Other3.8%
 


LinnHaley35.2%
 
Thornburgh61.9%
 
Other2.9%
 


LoganHaley16.6%
 
Thornburgh80.1%
 
Other3.3%
 


LyonHaley29.4%
 
Thornburgh67.8%
 
Other2.9%
 


McPhersonHaley23.1%
 
Thornburgh74.3%
 
Other2.6%
 


MarionHaley20.2%
 
Thornburgh76.5%
 
Other3.3%
 


MarshallHaley25.5%
 
Thornburgh70.0%
 
Other4.5%
 


MeadeHaley15.8%
 
Thornburgh81.4%
 
Other2.8%
 


MiamiHaley35.7%
 
Thornburgh61.4%
 
Other2.9%
 


MitchellHaley20.7%
 
Thornburgh76.8%
 
Other2.5%
 


MontgomeryHaley31.2%
 
Thornburgh66.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


MorrisHaley21.8%
 
Thornburgh75.4%
 
Other2.7%
 


MortonHaley18.4%
 
Thornburgh79.2%
 
Other2.4%
 


NemahaHaley20.5%
 
Thornburgh76.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


NeoshoHaley30.8%
 
Thornburgh67.5%
 
Other1.7%
 


NessHaley15.2%
 
Thornburgh82.5%
 
Other2.3%
 


NortonHaley19.9%
 
Thornburgh76.9%
 
Other3.2%
 


OsageHaley22.8%
 
Thornburgh74.6%
 
Other2.6%
 


OsborneHaley17.4%
 
Thornburgh79.6%
 
Other3.0%
 


OttawaHaley19.6%
 
Thornburgh78.2%
 
Other2.3%
 


PawneeHaley23.0%
 
Thornburgh74.9%
 
Other2.1%
 


PhillipsHaley18.2%
 
Thornburgh78.1%
 
Other3.7%
 


PottawatomieHaley18.1%
 
Thornburgh72.6%
 
Other9.3%
 


PrattHaley25.8%
 
Thornburgh71.5%
 
Other2.7%
 


RawlinsHaley16.2%
 
Thornburgh80.2%
 
Other3.6%
 


RenoHaley29.5%
 
Thornburgh68.1%
 
Other2.5%
 


RepublicHaley20.0%
 
Thornburgh77.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


RiceHaley26.7%
 
Thornburgh71.1%
 
Other2.1%
 


RileyHaley28.9%
 
Thornburgh68.7%
 
Other2.4%
 


RooksHaley19.4%
 
Thornburgh77.5%
 
Other3.1%
 


RushHaley21.6%
 
Thornburgh74.7%
 
Other3.7%
 


RussellHaley20.6%
 
Thornburgh76.3%
 
Other3.1%
 


SalineHaley27.8%
 
Thornburgh69.1%
 
Other3.1%
 


ScottHaley14.8%
 
Thornburgh82.7%
 
Other2.5%
 


SedgwickHaley34.5%
 
Thornburgh62.6%
 
Other2.8%
 


SewardHaley18.0%
 
Thornburgh79.6%
 
Other2.4%
 


ShawneeHaley31.0%
 
Thornburgh66.8%
 
Other2.2%
 


SheridanHaley18.0%
 
Thornburgh79.2%
 
Other2.7%
 


ShermanHaley19.7%
 
Thornburgh78.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


SmithHaley20.8%
 
Thornburgh75.5%
 
Other3.7%
 


StaffordHaley21.9%
 
Thornburgh75.2%
 
Other2.9%
 


StantonHaley16.6%
 
Thornburgh81.1%
 
Other2.2%
 


StevensHaley13.6%
 
Thornburgh82.9%
 
Other3.5%
 


SumnerHaley32.2%
 
Thornburgh63.9%
 
Other3.9%
 


ThomasHaley19.2%
 
Thornburgh78.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


TregoHaley26.6%
 
Thornburgh69.3%
 
Other4.1%
 


WabaunseeHaley18.3%
 
Thornburgh77.5%
 
Other4.2%
 


WallaceHaley11.6%
 
Thornburgh86.1%
 
Other2.2%
 


WashingtonHaley14.2%
 
Thornburgh83.2%
 
Other2.6%
 


WichitaHaley16.7%
 
Thornburgh81.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


WilsonHaley21.7%
 
Thornburgh75.8%
 
Other2.5%
 


WoodsonHaley26.2%
 
Thornburgh71.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


WyandotteHaley68.3%
 
Thornburgh29.3%
 
Other2.5%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Kansas Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved