2002 Presidential General Election Data Graphs - Michigan
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Alcona47.2%
 
52.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


Alger52.6%
 
46.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


Allegan36.7%
 
62.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


Alpena56.9%
 
42.1%
 
Other1.0%
 


Antrim39.7%
 
59.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


Arenac51.1%
 
47.3%
 
Other1.5%
 


Baraga50.9%
 
47.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


Barry40.1%
 
58.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


Bay53.3%
 
45.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


Benzie45.8%
 
52.5%
 
Other1.6%
 


Berrien41.9%
 
57.2%
 
Other0.9%
 


Branch45.0%
 
54.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


Calhoun52.6%
 
46.4%
 
Other1.0%
 


Cass45.1%
 
53.8%
 
Other1.1%
 


Charlevoix39.9%
 
58.3%
 
Other1.8%
 


Cheboygan43.3%
 
55.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


Chippewa49.8%
 
49.2%
 
Other1.0%
 


Clare50.1%
 
48.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


Clinton46.3%
 
52.6%
 
Other1.1%
 


Crawford45.6%
 
52.5%
 
Other1.9%
 


Delta50.4%
 
48.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


Dickinson46.5%
 
52.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


Eaton52.2%
 
46.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


Emmet37.2%
 
61.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


Genesee60.1%
 
38.6%
 
Other1.3%
 


Gladwin48.2%
 
50.6%
 
Other1.2%
 


Gogebic57.9%
 
40.6%
 
Other1.5%
 


Grand Traverse40.9%
 
57.7%
 
Other1.4%
 


Gratiot44.9%
 
54.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


Hillsdale38.4%
 
60.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


Houghton48.6%
 
49.5%
 
Other2.0%
 


Huron39.4%
 
59.5%
 
Other1.1%
 


Ingham60.9%
 
37.7%
 
Other1.3%
 


Ionia43.2%
 
55.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


Iosco50.3%
 
48.2%
 
Other1.5%
 


Iron53.5%
 
44.4%
 
Other2.0%
 


Isabella49.5%
 
48.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


Jackson46.9%
 
51.8%
 
Other1.2%
 


Kalamazoo52.3%
 
46.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


Kalkaska42.0%
 
56.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


Kent38.5%
 
60.6%
 
Other0.8%
 


Keweenaw46.0%
 
52.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


Lake52.2%
 
45.8%
 
Other1.9%
 


Lapeer39.4%
 
59.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


Leelanau42.9%
 
55.7%
 
Other1.3%
 


Lenawee47.1%
 
51.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


Livingston37.1%
 
61.9%
 
Other1.1%
 


Luce52.3%
 
45.7%
 
Other2.0%
 


Mackinac47.3%
 
52.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


Macomb47.2%
 
51.6%
 
Other1.2%
 


Manistee49.3%
 
49.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


Marquette57.7%
 
40.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


Mason45.6%
 
53.1%
 
Other1.3%
 


Mecosta44.3%
 
54.7%
 
Other1.1%
 


Menominee47.4%
 
50.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


Midland41.3%
 
57.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


Missaukee32.9%
 
66.1%
 
Other1.0%
 


Monroe47.8%
 
51.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


Montcalm44.2%
 
55.1%
 
Other0.7%
 


Montmorency42.9%
 
55.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


Muskegon56.5%
 
42.7%
 
Other0.8%
 


Newaygo40.8%
 
58.1%
 
Other1.1%
 


Oakland50.5%
 
48.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


Oceana45.2%
 
53.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


Ogemaw49.5%
 
49.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


Ontonagon48.4%
 
49.6%
 
Other2.0%
 


Osceola40.0%
 
59.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


Oscoda41.8%
 
56.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


Otsego39.5%
 
58.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


Ottawa28.1%
 
71.2%
 
Other0.7%
 


Presque Isle48.1%
 
50.7%
 
Other1.1%
 


Roscommon47.8%
 
50.9%
 
Other1.2%
 


Saginaw52.6%
 
46.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


St. Clair45.4%
 
52.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


St. Joseph40.9%
 
58.1%
 
Other1.0%
 


Sanilac37.4%
 
60.9%
 
Other1.7%
 


Schoolcraft52.9%
 
45.6%
 
Other1.5%
 


Shiawassee47.0%
 
51.5%
 
Other1.4%
 


Tuscola42.1%
 
56.3%
 
Other1.6%
 


Van Buren49.1%
 
49.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


Washtenaw61.4%
 
36.9%
 
Other1.7%
 


Wayne67.8%
 
31.1%
 
Other1.1%
 


Wexford42.3%
 
56.4%
 
Other1.3%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Michigan Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved