Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Hagan	32.1%
	Taft	63.4%
	Eastman	4.5%

Allen	Hagan	28.9%
	Taft	64.7%
	Eastman	6.4%
	Other	0.0%

Ashland	Hagan	30.6%
	Taft	65.8%
	Eastman	3.5%
	Other	0.0%

Ashtabula	Hagan	41.9%
	Taft	54.1%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Athens	Hagan	51.4%
	Taft	42.9%
	Eastman	5.7%
	Other	0.0%

Auglaize	Hagan	22.9%
	Taft	70.8%
	Eastman	6.2%
	Other	0.0%

Belmont	Hagan	46.0%
	Taft	49.9%
	Eastman	4.1%

Brown	Hagan	27.5%
	Taft	68.2%
	Eastman	4.2%

Butler	Hagan	24.1%
	Taft	71.6%
	Eastman	4.3%
	Other	0.0%

Carroll	Hagan	35.5%
	Taft	60.0%
	Eastman	4.5%
	Other	0.0%

Champaign	Hagan	27.2%
	Taft	66.6%
	Eastman	6.2%

Clark	Hagan	33.0%
	Taft	60.9%
	Eastman	6.1%
	Other	0.0%

Clermont	Hagan	21.4%
	Taft	74.7%
	Eastman	3.9%
	Other	0.0%

Clinton	Hagan	24.0%
	Taft	71.3%
	Eastman	4.8%

Columbiana	Hagan	36.9%
	Taft	59.0%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Coshocton	Hagan	28.5%
	Taft	66.6%
	Eastman	4.9%

Crawford	Hagan	29.3%
	Taft	66.0%
	Eastman	4.7%
	Other	0.0%

Cuyahoga	Hagan	59.5%
	Taft	37.7%
	Eastman	2.8%
	Other	0.0%

Darke	Hagan	24.2%
	Taft	70.5%
	Eastman	5.3%
	Other	0.0%

Defiance	Hagan	30.3%
	Taft	66.2%
	Eastman	3.5%

Delaware	Hagan	23.5%
	Taft	71.9%
	Eastman	4.5%
	Other	0.0%

Erie	Hagan	42.8%
	Taft	54.7%
	Eastman	2.5%
	Other	0.0%

Fairfield	Hagan	27.1%
	Taft	67.5%
	Eastman	5.4%
	Other	0.0%

Fayette	Hagan	27.7%
	Taft	67.3%
	Eastman	5.0%

Franklin	Hagan	39.3%
	Taft	56.6%
	Eastman	4.1%
	Other	0.0%

Fulton	Hagan	23.0%
	Taft	73.8%
	Eastman	3.2%
	Other	0.0%

Gallia	Hagan	29.9%
	Taft	65.5%
	Eastman	4.6%

Geauga	Hagan	35.6%
	Taft	61.4%
	Eastman	3.0%
	Other	0.0%

Greene	Hagan	27.5%
	Taft	67.2%
	Eastman	5.3%
	Other	0.0%

Guernsey	Hagan	37.3%
	Taft	58.5%
	Eastman	4.2%
	Other	0.0%

Hamilton	Hagan	30.3%
	Taft	65.8%
	Eastman	3.8%
	Other	0.0%

Hancock	Hagan	20.2%
	Taft	76.5%
	Eastman	3.3%
	Other	0.0%

Hardin	Hagan	33.7%
	Taft	61.4%
	Eastman	4.8%
	Other	0.0%

Harrison	Hagan	40.8%
	Taft	54.9%
	Eastman	4.4%
	Other	0.0%

Henry	Hagan	22.6%
	Taft	74.4%
	Eastman	3.0%

Highland	Hagan	27.3%
	Taft	67.9%
	Eastman	4.8%

Hocking	Hagan	37.9%
	Taft	55.1%
	Eastman	6.9%
	Other	0.0%

Holmes	Hagan	23.1%
	Taft	73.5%
	Eastman	3.4%

Huron	Hagan	30.8%
	Taft	65.8%
	Eastman	3.5%

Jackson	Hagan	32.6%
	Taft	62.3%
	Eastman	5.1%
	Other	0.0%

Jefferson	Hagan	39.8%
	Taft	56.2%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Knox	Hagan	29.3%
	Taft	65.3%
	Eastman	5.5%

Lake	Hagan	40.8%
	Taft	56.6%
	Eastman	2.6%
	Other	0.0%

Lawrence	Hagan	35.5%
	Taft	61.1%
	Eastman	3.4%

Licking	Hagan	26.8%
	Taft	68.1%
	Eastman	5.1%
	Other	0.0%

Logan	Hagan	23.0%
	Taft	71.5%
	Eastman	5.5%
	Other	0.0%

Lorain	Hagan	49.1%
	Taft	47.7%
	Eastman	3.2%
	Other	0.0%

Lucas	Hagan	38.3%
	Taft	59.1%
	Eastman	2.5%
	Other	0.0%

Madison	Hagan	27.9%
	Taft	66.0%
	Eastman	6.1%

Mahoning	Hagan	49.6%
	Taft	46.1%
	Eastman	4.2%
	Other	0.1%

Marion	Hagan	33.0%
	Taft	61.2%
	Eastman	5.8%

Medina	Hagan	38.3%
	Taft	58.3%
	Eastman	3.4%

Meigs	Hagan	28.6%
	Taft	65.6%
	Eastman	5.8%

Mercer	Hagan	21.8%
	Taft	74.2%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Miami	Hagan	24.7%
	Taft	70.1%
	Eastman	5.2%
	Other	0.0%

Monroe	Hagan	47.6%
	Taft	48.8%
	Eastman	3.6%

Montgomery	Hagan	36.9%
	Taft	59.5%
	Eastman	3.6%
	Other	0.0%

Morgan	Hagan	29.7%
	Taft	64.2%
	Eastman	6.1%

Morrow	Hagan	29.2%
	Taft	63.6%
	Eastman	7.1%

Muskingum	Hagan	28.0%
	Taft	66.8%
	Eastman	5.2%
	Other	0.0%

Noble	Hagan	38.0%
	Taft	56.9%
	Eastman	5.1%

Ottawa	Hagan	33.9%
	Taft	63.0%
	Eastman	3.1%
	Other	0.0%

Paulding	Hagan	31.4%
	Taft	64.4%
	Eastman	4.2%

Perry	Hagan	37.8%
	Taft	56.3%
	Eastman	6.0%

Pickaway	Hagan	31.8%
	Taft	62.5%
	Eastman	5.7%

Pike	Hagan	43.8%
	Taft	52.5%
	Eastman	3.7%

Portage	Hagan	47.5%
	Taft	47.9%
	Eastman	4.7%
	Other	0.0%

Preble	Hagan	26.7%
	Taft	67.3%
	Eastman	6.0%
	Other	0.0%

Putnam	Hagan	25.2%
	Taft	69.7%
	Eastman	5.0%
	Other	0.0%

Richland	Hagan	36.7%
	Taft	59.7%
	Eastman	3.6%
	Other	0.0%

Ross	Hagan	36.7%
	Taft	59.4%
	Eastman	4.0%

Sandusky	Hagan	32.3%
	Taft	64.0%
	Eastman	3.7%

Scioto	Hagan	40.6%
	Taft	55.7%
	Eastman	3.7%

Seneca	Hagan	28.8%
	Taft	66.8%
	Eastman	4.4%

Shelby	Hagan	25.8%
	Taft	68.9%
	Eastman	5.2%
	Other	0.1%

Stark	Hagan	39.2%
	Taft	56.7%
	Eastman	4.1%
	Other	0.0%

Summit	Hagan	48.9%
	Taft	47.3%
	Eastman	3.7%
	Other	0.0%

Trumbull	Hagan	49.3%
	Taft	47.0%
	Eastman	3.6%
	Other	0.0%

Tuscarawas	Hagan	42.4%
	Taft	53.6%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Union	Hagan	22.5%
	Taft	71.2%
	Eastman	6.3%
	Other	0.0%

Van Wert	Hagan	23.0%
	Taft	72.5%
	Eastman	4.4%
	Other	0.0%

Vinton	Hagan	38.2%
	Taft	56.3%
	Eastman	5.5%

Warren	Hagan	20.0%
	Taft	76.0%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Washington	Hagan	33.1%
	Taft	62.9%
	Eastman	4.0%
	Other	0.0%

Wayne	Hagan	29.7%
	Taft	66.7%
	Eastman	3.6%

Williams	Hagan	26.5%
	Taft	69.1%
	Eastman	4.4%
	Other	0.0%

Wood	Hagan	30.4%
	Taft	66.4%
	Eastman	3.1%
	Other	0.0%

Wyandot	Hagan	25.7%
	Taft	69.6%
	Eastman	4.6%
	Other	0.0%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Ohio Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved