Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Aurora	Johnson	55.0%
	Thune	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Beadle	Johnson	54.9%
	Thune	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Bennett	Johnson	55.9%
	Thune	43.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Bon Homme	Johnson	55.8%
	Thune	43.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Brookings	Johnson	54.3%
	Thune	44.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Brown	Johnson	57.3%
	Thune	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Brule	Johnson	53.3%
	Thune	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Buffalo	Johnson	79.6%
	Thune	19.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Butte	Johnson	33.4%
	Thune	65.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Campbell	Johnson	38.3%
	Thune	60.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Charles Mix	Johnson	52.4%
	Thune	47.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Clark	Johnson	55.0%
	Thune	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Clay	Johnson	65.6%
	Thune	33.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Codington	Johnson	50.1%
	Thune	49.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Corson	Johnson	62.3%
	Thune	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Custer	Johnson	34.2%
	Thune	64.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Davison	Johnson	49.5%
	Thune	49.6%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Day	Johnson	64.1%
	Thune	35.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Deuel	Johnson	58.1%
	Thune	40.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Dewey	Johnson	73.0%
	Thune	26.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Douglas	Johnson	32.5%
	Thune	66.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Edmunds	Johnson	50.7%
	Thune	48.6%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Fall River	Johnson	39.7%
	Thune	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Faulk	Johnson	45.6%
	Thune	52.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Grant	Johnson	53.2%
	Thune	46.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Gregory	Johnson	46.5%
	Thune	52.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Haakon	Johnson	28.5%
	Thune	70.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Hamlin	Johnson	49.2%
	Thune	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Hand	Johnson	50.7%
	Thune	47.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Hanson	Johnson	42.6%
	Thune	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Harding	Johnson	20.8%
	Thune	77.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Hughes	Johnson	43.2%
	Thune	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Hutchinson	Johnson	42.7%
	Thune	56.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Hyde	Johnson	41.7%
	Thune	56.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Jackson	Johnson	47.3%
	Thune	51.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Jerauld	Johnson	59.9%
	Thune	39.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Jones	Johnson	27.8%
	Thune	71.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Kingsbury	Johnson	55.9%
	Thune	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Lake	Johnson	58.2%
	Thune	40.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Lawrence	Johnson	38.6%
	Thune	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Lincoln	Johnson	45.0%
	Thune	54.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Lyman	Johnson	56.8%
	Thune	42.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

McCook	Johnson	50.4%
	Thune	48.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

McPherson	Johnson	35.9%
	Thune	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Marshall	Johnson	60.6%
	Thune	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Meade	Johnson	33.9%
	Thune	64.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Mellette	Johnson	54.0%
	Thune	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Miner	Johnson	60.8%
	Thune	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Minnehaha	Johnson	51.7%
	Thune	47.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Moody	Johnson	61.7%
	Thune	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Pennington	Johnson	38.2%
	Thune	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Perkins	Johnson	35.4%
	Thune	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Potter	Johnson	43.0%
	Thune	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Roberts	Johnson	60.2%
	Thune	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Sanborn	Johnson	55.5%
	Thune	43.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Shannon	Johnson	91.6%
	Thune	8.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Spink	Johnson	57.1%
	Thune	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Stanley	Johnson	45.0%
	Thune	54.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Sully	Johnson	38.8%
	Thune	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Todd	Johnson	80.8%
	Thune	18.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Tripp	Johnson	43.8%
	Thune	55.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Turner	Johnson	47.8%
	Thune	51.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Union	Johnson	47.7%
	Thune	51.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Walworth	Johnson	43.3%
	Thune	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Yankton	Johnson	51.8%
	Thune	46.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Ziebach	Johnson	66.4%
	Thune	32.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

National DataGraph for 2002 - South Dakota Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved