2002 Presidential General Election Data Graphs - Tennessee
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Anderson54.5%
 
44.1%
 
Other1.4%
 


Bedford50.4%
 
48.1%
 
Other1.5%
 


Benton64.7%
 
33.1%
 
Other2.2%
 


Bledsoe48.2%
 
50.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


Blount42.5%
 
55.6%
 
Other1.9%
 


Bradley37.6%
 
60.4%
 
Other2.1%
 


Campbell54.3%
 
44.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


Cannon57.8%
 
40.8%
 
Other1.4%
 


Carroll54.4%
 
43.7%
 
Other2.0%
 


Carter37.1%
 
60.9%
 
Other2.1%
 


Cheatham50.2%
 
48.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


Chester42.1%
 
56.3%
 
Other1.6%
 


Claiborne49.2%
 
49.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


Clay59.7%
 
38.7%
 
Other1.6%
 


Cocke49.5%
 
48.3%
 
Other2.2%
 


Coffee50.5%
 
48.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


Crockett52.6%
 
45.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


Cumberland44.0%
 
54.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


Davidson58.5%
 
38.1%
 
Other3.4%
 


Decatur56.6%
 
41.4%
 
Other1.9%
 


DeKalb58.4%
 
40.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


Dickson57.0%
 
41.4%
 
Other1.6%
 


Dyer50.7%
 
47.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


Fayette41.0%
 
57.2%
 
Other1.8%
 


Fentress42.8%
 
56.3%
 
Other0.9%
 


Franklin53.3%
 
45.3%
 
Other1.3%
 


Gibson52.6%
 
45.4%
 
Other2.0%
 


Giles52.9%
 
45.9%
 
Other1.3%
 


Grainger45.8%
 
52.9%
 
Other1.4%
 


Greene41.4%
 
57.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


Grundy67.8%
 
31.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


Hamblen44.4%
 
54.3%
 
Other1.3%
 


Hamilton46.3%
 
52.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


Hancock42.3%
 
56.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


Hardeman56.5%
 
41.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


Hardin48.1%
 
51.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


Hawkins42.0%
 
56.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


Haywood59.3%
 
38.9%
 
Other1.8%
 


Henderson43.2%
 
54.8%
 
Other2.0%
 


Henry59.8%
 
37.9%
 
Other2.2%
 


Hickman60.3%
 
38.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


Houston71.1%
 
27.1%
 
Other1.8%
 


Humphreys65.0%
 
33.3%
 
Other1.6%
 


Jackson67.5%
 
30.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


Jefferson44.4%
 
54.1%
 
Other1.5%
 


Johnson36.3%
 
62.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


Knox49.4%
 
49.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


Lake71.1%
 
25.2%
 
Other3.7%
 


Lauderdale56.3%
 
41.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


Lawrence47.0%
 
51.8%
 
Other1.2%
 


Lewis53.0%
 
44.5%
 
Other2.5%
 


Lincoln43.1%
 
55.2%
 
Other1.7%
 


Loudon42.3%
 
56.7%
 
Other1.1%
 


McMinn43.6%
 
54.5%
 
Other1.9%
 


McNairy48.0%
 
50.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


Macon49.7%
 
48.9%
 
Other1.4%
 


Madison48.9%
 
49.5%
 
Other1.7%
 


Marion60.3%
 
38.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


Marshall57.5%
 
40.7%
 
Other1.8%
 


Maury52.8%
 
45.3%
 
Other1.8%
 


Meigs52.7%
 
45.5%
 
Other1.8%
 


Monroe46.3%
 
52.1%
 
Other1.6%
 


Montgomery58.5%
 
39.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


Moore45.9%
 
51.7%
 
Other2.5%
 


Morgan57.7%
 
41.5%
 
Other0.8%
 


Obion57.7%
 
39.7%
 
Other2.5%
 


Overton65.7%
 
32.6%
 
Other1.6%
 


Perry59.8%
 
37.8%
 
Other2.4%
 


Pickett40.1%
 
59.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


Polk56.0%
 
42.4%
 
Other1.6%
 


Putnam54.4%
 
43.8%
 
Other1.9%
 


Rhea33.3%
 
65.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


Roane56.1%
 
42.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


Robertson52.5%
 
45.9%
 
Other1.7%
 


Rutherford48.2%
 
50.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


Scott48.0%
 
51.2%
 
Other0.9%
 


Sequatchie55.4%
 
43.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


Sevier37.5%
 
61.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


Shelby56.1%
 
42.2%
 
Other1.7%
 


Smith63.0%
 
35.1%
 
Other1.9%
 


Stewart66.6%
 
31.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


Sullivan41.8%
 
56.7%
 
Other1.5%
 


Sumner47.8%
 
50.7%
 
Other1.5%
 


Tipton38.6%
 
59.5%
 
Other1.9%
 


Trousdale65.8%
 
32.7%
 
Other1.5%
 


Unicoi41.2%
 
57.1%
 
Other1.7%
 


Union49.3%
 
49.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


Van Buren63.3%
 
35.2%
 
Other1.5%
 


Warren59.3%
 
39.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


Washington40.3%
 
58.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


Wayne40.3%
 
58.9%
 
Other0.8%
 


Weakley54.4%
 
43.7%
 
Other1.9%
 


White49.8%
 
48.6%
 
Other1.5%
 


Williamson41.2%
 
57.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


Wilson48.3%
 
50.1%
 
Other1.6%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Tennessee Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved