Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Anderson	Clement	43.3%
	Alexander	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Bedford	Clement	49.3%
	Alexander	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Benton	Clement	62.3%
	Alexander	35.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Bledsoe	Clement	44.6%
	Alexander	53.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Blount	Clement	34.8%
	Alexander	63.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Bradley	Clement	28.7%
	Alexander	69.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Campbell	Clement	50.1%
	Alexander	48.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Cannon	Clement	56.8%
	Alexander	41.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Carroll	Clement	48.9%
	Alexander	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Carter	Clement	28.9%
	Alexander	68.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Cheatham	Clement	47.4%
	Alexander	51.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Chester	Clement	41.3%
	Alexander	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Claiborne	Clement	44.4%
	Alexander	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Clay	Clement	54.9%
	Alexander	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Cocke	Clement	39.5%
	Alexander	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Coffee	Clement	48.7%
	Alexander	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Crockett	Clement	50.3%
	Alexander	48.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Cumberland	Clement	39.7%
	Alexander	58.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Davidson	Clement	56.2%
	Alexander	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Decatur	Clement	54.5%
	Alexander	43.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

DeKalb	Clement	58.3%
	Alexander	40.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Dickson	Clement	56.2%
	Alexander	43.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Dyer	Clement	44.8%
	Alexander	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Fayette	Clement	37.9%
	Alexander	60.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Fentress	Clement	43.9%
	Alexander	54.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Franklin	Clement	51.3%
	Alexander	47.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Gibson	Clement	47.6%
	Alexander	50.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Giles	Clement	51.3%
	Alexander	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Grainger	Clement	39.9%
	Alexander	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Greene	Clement	32.3%
	Alexander	65.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Grundy	Clement	65.9%
	Alexander	33.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Hamblen	Clement	36.9%
	Alexander	61.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Hamilton	Clement	38.2%
	Alexander	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Hancock	Clement	35.4%
	Alexander	62.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Hardeman	Clement	51.0%
	Alexander	46.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Hardin	Clement	46.2%
	Alexander	52.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Hawkins	Clement	35.4%
	Alexander	62.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Haywood	Clement	55.6%
	Alexander	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Henderson	Clement	40.3%
	Alexander	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Henry	Clement	55.2%
	Alexander	43.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Hickman	Clement	59.5%
	Alexander	39.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Houston	Clement	69.1%
	Alexander	29.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Humphreys	Clement	64.5%
	Alexander	34.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Jackson	Clement	65.5%
	Alexander	33.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Jefferson	Clement	36.3%
	Alexander	61.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Johnson	Clement	27.8%
	Alexander	70.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Knox	Clement	36.8%
	Alexander	61.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lake	Clement	59.0%
	Alexander	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Lauderdale	Clement	53.2%
	Alexander	44.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lawrence	Clement	45.1%
	Alexander	53.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Lewis	Clement	53.4%
	Alexander	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lincoln	Clement	45.8%
	Alexander	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Loudon	Clement	32.8%
	Alexander	66.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

McMinn	Clement	36.5%
	Alexander	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

McNairy	Clement	46.5%
	Alexander	52.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Macon	Clement	49.3%
	Alexander	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Madison	Clement	42.6%
	Alexander	56.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Marion	Clement	53.2%
	Alexander	45.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Marshall	Clement	53.2%
	Alexander	44.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Maury	Clement	48.9%
	Alexander	49.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Meigs	Clement	43.1%
	Alexander	54.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Monroe	Clement	39.9%
	Alexander	58.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Montgomery	Clement	49.0%
	Alexander	49.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Moore	Clement	48.4%
	Alexander	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Morgan	Clement	51.9%
	Alexander	47.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Obion	Clement	52.6%
	Alexander	45.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Overton	Clement	62.4%
	Alexander	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Perry	Clement	58.1%
	Alexander	39.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Pickett	Clement	41.5%
	Alexander	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Polk	Clement	48.7%
	Alexander	49.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Putnam	Clement	47.7%
	Alexander	50.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Rhea	Clement	33.0%
	Alexander	65.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Roane	Clement	42.8%
	Alexander	55.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Robertson	Clement	52.8%
	Alexander	46.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Rutherford	Clement	42.2%
	Alexander	56.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Scott	Clement	46.8%
	Alexander	51.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Sequatchie	Clement	50.2%
	Alexander	48.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Sevier	Clement	30.4%
	Alexander	68.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Shelby	Clement	49.3%
	Alexander	49.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Smith	Clement	61.7%
	Alexander	37.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Stewart	Clement	63.5%
	Alexander	34.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Sullivan	Clement	30.6%
	Alexander	67.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Sumner	Clement	42.3%
	Alexander	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Tipton	Clement	34.0%
	Alexander	64.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Trousdale	Clement	64.2%
	Alexander	34.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Unicoi	Clement	28.9%
	Alexander	69.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Union	Clement	44.6%
	Alexander	54.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Van Buren	Clement	60.4%
	Alexander	38.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Warren	Clement	54.1%
	Alexander	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Washington	Clement	30.3%
	Alexander	67.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Wayne	Clement	37.6%
	Alexander	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Weakley	Clement	50.4%
	Alexander	47.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

White	Clement	52.2%
	Alexander	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Williamson	Clement	29.1%
	Alexander	70.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Wilson	Clement	42.4%
	Alexander	56.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Tennessee Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved