2004 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Indiana
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdamsBayh57.4%
 
Scott41.6%
 
Other1.0%
 


AllenBayh57.8%
 
Scott41.3%
 
Other0.9%
 


BartholomewBayh58.4%
 
Scott40.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


BentonBayh63.0%
 
Scott35.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


BlackfordBayh69.1%
 
Scott30.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


BooneBayh48.8%
 
Scott50.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


BrownBayh59.7%
 
Scott38.6%
 
Other1.7%
 


CarrollBayh59.7%
 
Scott39.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


CassBayh56.8%
 
Scott42.1%
 
Other1.1%
 


ClarkBayh62.8%
 
Scott36.4%
 
Other0.9%
 


ClayBayh64.9%
 
Scott34.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


ClintonBayh56.3%
 
Scott42.8%
 
Other0.9%
 


CrawfordBayh63.6%
 
Scott35.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


DaviessBayh56.4%
 
Scott42.6%
 
Other1.0%
 


DearbornBayh45.7%
 
Scott52.7%
 
Other1.5%
 


DecaturBayh61.3%
 
Scott37.8%
 
Other0.9%
 


DeKalbBayh56.2%
 
Scott43.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


DelawareBayh69.5%
 
Scott29.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


DuboisBayh66.2%
 
Scott33.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


ElkhartBayh51.2%
 
Scott47.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


FayetteBayh64.0%
 
Scott34.5%
 
Other1.4%
 


FloydBayh62.1%
 
Scott36.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


FountainBayh60.1%
 
Scott39.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


FranklinBayh53.5%
 
Scott44.8%
 
Other1.7%
 


FultonBayh60.7%
 
Scott38.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


GibsonBayh69.6%
 
Scott29.5%
 
Other0.9%
 


GrantBayh61.4%
 
Scott37.6%
 
Other0.9%
 


GreeneBayh64.7%
 
Scott34.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


HamiltonBayh46.4%
 
Scott52.6%
 
Other0.9%
 


HancockBayh52.3%
 
Scott46.6%
 
Other1.1%
 


HarrisonBayh59.0%
 
Scott39.9%
 
Other1.1%
 


HendricksBayh48.0%
 
Scott51.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


HenryBayh62.6%
 
Scott36.1%
 
Other1.3%
 


HowardBayh58.9%
 
Scott40.1%
 
Other1.0%
 


HuntingtonBayh52.8%
 
Scott46.2%
 
Other1.0%
 


JacksonBayh62.2%
 
Scott36.7%
 
Other1.1%
 


JasperBayh49.2%
 
Scott49.6%
 
Other1.1%
 


JayBayh63.5%
 
Scott35.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


JeffersonBayh61.4%
 
Scott37.5%
 
Other1.1%
 


JenningsBayh60.9%
 
Scott37.9%
 
Other1.2%
 


JohnsonBayh53.2%
 
Scott45.8%
 
Other1.0%
 


KnoxBayh71.5%
 
Scott27.5%
 
Other1.0%
 


KosciuskoBayh45.7%
 
Scott53.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


LaGrangeBayh54.3%
 
Scott44.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


LakeBayh71.4%
 
Scott27.3%
 
Other1.3%
 


LaPorteBayh69.7%
 
Scott28.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


LawrenceBayh52.4%
 
Scott46.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


MadisonBayh64.3%
 
Scott34.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


MarionBayh66.1%
 
Scott33.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


MarshallBayh57.5%
 
Scott41.5%
 
Other1.0%
 


MartinBayh66.7%
 
Scott32.1%
 
Other1.2%
 


MiamiBayh54.5%
 
Scott44.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


MonroeBayh68.9%
 
Scott29.3%
 
Other1.8%
 


MontgomeryBayh59.9%
 
Scott39.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


MorganBayh50.1%
 
Scott48.7%
 
Other1.2%
 


NewtonBayh55.7%
 
Scott42.7%
 
Other1.6%
 


NobleBayh57.0%
 
Scott42.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


OhioBayh54.4%
 
Scott44.3%
 
Other1.3%
 


OrangeBayh61.1%
 
Scott37.8%
 
Other1.1%
 


OwenBayh60.5%
 
Scott38.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


ParkeBayh65.8%
 
Scott33.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


PerryBayh71.6%
 
Scott27.6%
 
Other0.8%
 


PikeBayh69.8%
 
Scott29.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


PorterBayh63.9%
 
Scott34.3%
 
Other1.9%
 


PoseyBayh69.0%
 
Scott30.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


PulaskiBayh59.1%
 
Scott39.7%
 
Other1.2%
 


PutnamBayh59.1%
 
Scott39.9%
 
Other1.0%
 


RandolphBayh61.9%
 
Scott36.8%
 
Other1.2%
 


RipleyBayh53.3%
 
Scott45.3%
 
Other1.4%
 


RushBayh58.6%
 
Scott40.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


St. JosephBayh70.0%
 
Scott29.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


ScottBayh70.7%
 
Scott28.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


ShelbyBayh56.7%
 
Scott42.4%
 
Other0.9%
 


SpencerBayh65.7%
 
Scott33.6%
 
Other0.7%
 


StarkeBayh67.8%
 
Scott30.6%
 
Other1.6%
 


SteubenBayh58.7%
 
Scott40.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


SullivanBayh73.6%
 
Scott25.4%
 
Other1.0%
 


SwitzerlandBayh59.6%
 
Scott38.9%
 
Other1.5%
 


TippecanoeBayh63.5%
 
Scott34.9%
 
Other1.6%
 


TiptonBayh58.5%
 
Scott40.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


UnionBayh54.6%
 
Scott43.6%
 
Other1.8%
 


VanderburghBayh67.6%
 
Scott31.2%
 
Other1.2%
 


VermillionBayh78.0%
 
Scott21.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


VigoBayh75.3%
 
Scott23.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


WabashBayh51.6%
 
Scott47.5%
 
Other0.8%
 


WarrenBayh61.1%
 
Scott37.7%
 
Other1.2%
 


WarrickBayh62.2%
 
Scott37.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


WashingtonBayh58.4%
 
Scott40.1%
 
Other1.5%
 


WayneBayh58.5%
 
Scott39.4%
 
Other2.1%
 


WellsBayh53.5%
 
Scott45.7%
 
Other0.8%
 


WhiteBayh64.3%
 
Scott34.6%
 
Other1.0%
 


WhitleyBayh55.6%
 
Scott43.3%
 
Other1.1%
 



National DataGraph for 2004 - Indiana Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved