Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-16

Map

Map

Appling	Martin	39.0%
	Hecht	44.0%
	Other	17.1%

Atkinson	Martin	31.9%
	Hecht	49.0%
	Other	19.1%

Bacon	Martin	43.6%
	Hecht	47.4%
	Other	9.0%

Baker	Martin	41.1%
	Hecht	41.8%
	Other	17.1%

Baldwin	Martin	39.3%
	Hecht	47.6%
	Other	13.1%

Banks	Martin	55.3%
	Hecht	32.4%
	Other	12.4%

Barrow	Martin	44.8%
	Hecht	33.7%
	Other	21.5%

Bartow	Martin	45.2%
	Hecht	30.3%
	Other	24.5%

Ben Hill	Martin	42.9%
	Hecht	46.5%
	Other	10.7%

Berrien	Martin	37.3%
	Hecht	49.7%
	Other	13.0%

Bibb	Martin	37.5%
	Hecht	52.9%
	Other	9.7%

Bleckley	Martin	36.5%
	Hecht	55.5%
	Other	8.1%

Brantley	Martin	41.6%
	Hecht	35.2%
	Other	23.3%

Brooks	Martin	39.0%
	Hecht	37.7%
	Other	23.3%

Bryan	Martin	40.2%
	Hecht	45.2%
	Other	14.6%

Bulloch	Martin	54.1%
	Hecht	36.8%
	Other	9.1%

Burke	Martin	35.9%
	Hecht	43.8%
	Other	20.4%

Butts	Martin	43.3%
	Hecht	35.8%
	Other	20.9%

Calhoun	Martin	42.3%
	Hecht	43.6%
	Other	14.1%

Camden	Martin	31.8%
	Hecht	22.2%
	Other	46.0%

Candler	Martin	52.7%
	Hecht	35.4%
	Other	11.9%

Carroll	Martin	50.7%
	Hecht	31.2%
	Other	18.1%

Catoosa	Martin	39.8%
	Hecht	32.3%
	Other	27.8%

Charlton	Martin	33.7%
	Hecht	30.8%
	Other	35.4%

Chatham	Martin	35.1%
	Hecht	47.2%
	Other	17.7%

Chattahoochee	Martin	38.5%
	Hecht	46.6%
	Other	14.9%

Chattooga	Martin	41.0%
	Hecht	46.0%
	Other	13.0%

Cherokee	Martin	46.7%
	Hecht	33.1%
	Other	20.2%

Clarke	Martin	50.8%
	Hecht	29.1%
	Other	20.1%

Clay	Martin	50.2%
	Hecht	33.1%
	Other	16.7%

Clayton	Martin	23.7%
	Hecht	51.0%
	Other	25.3%

Clinch	Martin	43.2%
	Hecht	25.3%
	Other	31.5%

Cobb	Martin	43.6%
	Hecht	32.8%
	Other	23.6%

Coffee	Martin	39.9%
	Hecht	38.4%
	Other	21.7%

Colquitt	Martin	36.8%
	Hecht	42.4%
	Other	20.8%

Columbia	Martin	37.0%
	Hecht	47.6%
	Other	15.4%

Cook	Martin	32.8%
	Hecht	54.0%
	Other	13.2%

Coweta	Martin	43.6%
	Hecht	31.9%
	Other	24.5%

Crawford	Martin	41.2%
	Hecht	49.5%
	Other	9.3%

Crisp	Martin	37.5%
	Hecht	50.0%
	Other	12.4%

Dade	Martin	43.1%
	Hecht	28.3%
	Other	28.6%

Dawson	Martin	56.9%
	Hecht	30.6%
	Other	12.5%

Decatur	Martin	44.5%
	Hecht	35.8%
	Other	19.8%

DeKalb	Martin	39.1%
	Hecht	24.6%
	Other	36.3%

Dodge	Martin	39.1%
	Hecht	50.6%
	Other	10.3%

Dooly	Martin	44.9%
	Hecht	46.4%
	Other	8.6%

Dougherty	Martin	31.0%
	Hecht	59.5%
	Other	9.6%

Douglas	Martin	35.7%
	Hecht	38.4%
	Other	25.9%

Early	Martin	50.1%
	Hecht	36.4%
	Other	13.6%

Echols	Martin	40.8%
	Hecht	40.0%
	Other	19.2%

Effingham	Martin	41.1%
	Hecht	48.2%
	Other	10.7%

Elbert	Martin	46.6%
	Hecht	39.6%
	Other	13.9%

Emanuel	Martin	43.6%
	Hecht	45.0%
	Other	11.3%

Evans	Martin	48.4%
	Hecht	43.6%
	Other	8.0%

Fannin	Martin	53.6%
	Hecht	28.3%
	Other	18.2%

Fayette	Martin	36.8%
	Hecht	41.6%
	Other	21.6%

Floyd	Martin	50.9%
	Hecht	31.9%
	Other	17.2%

Forsyth	Martin	53.4%
	Hecht	29.4%
	Other	17.3%

Franklin	Martin	48.0%
	Hecht	37.4%
	Other	14.6%

Fulton	Martin	46.0%
	Hecht	27.9%
	Other	26.1%

Gilmer	Martin	53.2%
	Hecht	32.7%
	Other	14.1%

Glascock	Martin	41.9%
	Hecht	50.0%
	Other	8.1%

Glynn	Martin	33.3%
	Hecht	23.5%
	Other	43.2%

Gordon	Martin	49.2%
	Hecht	33.2%
	Other	17.6%

Grady	Martin	43.5%
	Hecht	32.8%
	Other	23.7%

Greene	Martin	41.5%
	Hecht	36.7%
	Other	21.8%

Gwinnett	Martin	41.4%
	Hecht	32.5%
	Other	26.0%

Habersham	Martin	55.0%
	Hecht	30.5%
	Other	14.5%

Hall	Martin	51.4%
	Hecht	30.3%
	Other	18.3%

Hancock	Martin	38.3%
	Hecht	43.2%
	Other	18.4%

Haralson	Martin	51.8%
	Hecht	35.4%
	Other	12.8%

Harris	Martin	45.1%
	Hecht	43.1%
	Other	11.9%

Hart	Martin	48.5%
	Hecht	33.2%
	Other	18.3%

Heard	Martin	49.2%
	Hecht	33.6%
	Other	17.2%

Henry	Martin	32.9%
	Hecht	40.2%
	Other	26.9%

Houston	Martin	37.3%
	Hecht	52.4%
	Other	10.3%

Irwin	Martin	47.0%
	Hecht	43.3%
	Other	9.7%

Jackson	Martin	50.8%
	Hecht	33.3%
	Other	15.9%

Jasper	Martin	47.7%
	Hecht	31.7%
	Other	20.6%

Jeff Davis	Martin	42.0%
	Hecht	41.9%
	Other	16.0%

Jefferson	Martin	42.5%
	Hecht	42.1%
	Other	15.4%

Jenkins	Martin	52.1%
	Hecht	32.8%
	Other	15.0%

Johnson	Martin	45.9%
	Hecht	44.3%
	Other	9.8%

Jones	Martin	39.3%
	Hecht	53.7%
	Other	7.0%

Lamar	Martin	44.1%
	Hecht	39.8%
	Other	16.1%

Lanier	Martin	38.2%
	Hecht	43.0%
	Other	18.8%

Laurens	Martin	42.6%
	Hecht	45.8%
	Other	11.6%

Lee	Martin	31.2%
	Hecht	60.4%
	Other	8.4%

Liberty	Martin	39.0%
	Hecht	39.0%
	Other	22.0%

Lincoln	Martin	30.8%
	Hecht	42.4%
	Other	26.8%

Long	Martin	36.8%
	Hecht	45.0%
	Other	18.1%

Lowndes	Martin	44.4%
	Hecht	35.5%
	Other	20.2%

Lumpkin	Martin	47.7%
	Hecht	38.3%
	Other	14.0%

McDuffie	Martin	41.7%
	Hecht	44.0%
	Other	14.3%

McIntosh	Martin	13.8%
	Hecht	14.0%
	Other	72.2%

Macon	Martin	35.5%
	Hecht	53.3%
	Other	11.2%

Madison	Martin	46.5%
	Hecht	34.8%
	Other	18.7%

Marion	Martin	51.9%
	Hecht	38.0%
	Other	10.1%

Meriwether	Martin	42.5%
	Hecht	36.0%
	Other	21.5%

Miller	Martin	41.7%
	Hecht	43.2%
	Other	15.2%

Mitchell	Martin	38.8%
	Hecht	45.2%
	Other	16.0%

Monroe	Martin	47.7%
	Hecht	42.1%
	Other	10.3%

Montgomery	Martin	54.8%
	Hecht	36.8%
	Other	8.4%

Morgan	Martin	45.0%
	Hecht	35.1%
	Other	19.9%

Murray	Martin	47.1%
	Hecht	32.1%
	Other	20.8%

Muscogee	Martin	45.1%
	Hecht	44.3%
	Other	10.7%

Newton	Martin	40.1%
	Hecht	31.1%
	Other	28.8%

Oconee	Martin	52.7%
	Hecht	29.6%
	Other	17.8%

Oglethorpe	Martin	51.4%
	Hecht	30.7%
	Other	17.9%

Paulding	Martin	43.0%
	Hecht	33.5%
	Other	23.5%

Peach	Martin	37.8%
	Hecht	52.4%
	Other	9.8%

Pickens	Martin	60.1%
	Hecht	28.4%
	Other	11.5%

Pierce	Martin	43.8%
	Hecht	38.1%
	Other	18.1%

Pike	Martin	41.6%
	Hecht	40.2%
	Other	18.2%

Polk	Martin	48.9%
	Hecht	33.6%
	Other	17.5%

Pulaski	Martin	38.0%
	Hecht	52.9%
	Other	9.2%

Putnam	Martin	39.3%
	Hecht	45.0%
	Other	15.7%

Quitman	Martin	44.8%
	Hecht	45.5%
	Other	9.7%

Rabun	Martin	52.4%
	Hecht	31.7%
	Other	15.9%

Randolph	Martin	40.1%
	Hecht	48.6%
	Other	11.3%

Richmond	Martin	39.6%
	Hecht	43.9%
	Other	16.4%

Rockdale	Martin	33.6%
	Hecht	30.5%
	Other	35.9%

Schley	Martin	45.8%
	Hecht	42.8%
	Other	11.4%

Screven	Martin	51.8%
	Hecht	36.6%
	Other	11.6%

Seminole	Martin	47.6%
	Hecht	33.6%
	Other	18.7%

Spalding	Martin	38.0%
	Hecht	39.1%
	Other	22.9%

Stephens	Martin	47.0%
	Hecht	32.6%
	Other	20.4%

Stewart	Martin	46.0%
	Hecht	42.7%
	Other	11.4%

Sumter	Martin	38.8%
	Hecht	47.9%
	Other	13.3%

Talbot	Martin	47.5%
	Hecht	38.1%
	Other	14.4%

Taliaferro	Martin	41.6%
	Hecht	35.7%
	Other	22.7%

Tattnall	Martin	49.3%
	Hecht	39.8%
	Other	10.8%

Taylor	Martin	49.5%
	Hecht	42.3%
	Other	8.2%

Telfair	Martin	44.0%
	Hecht	44.0%
	Other	12.0%

Terrell	Martin	38.7%
	Hecht	50.8%
	Other	10.6%

Thomas	Martin	45.5%
	Hecht	28.6%
	Other	25.9%

Tift	Martin	38.4%
	Hecht	49.6%
	Other	11.9%

Toombs	Martin	44.3%
	Hecht	39.5%
	Other	16.2%

Towns	Martin	51.5%
	Hecht	35.0%
	Other	13.5%

Treutlen	Martin	36.4%
	Hecht	54.7%
	Other	8.8%

Troup	Martin	47.4%
	Hecht	30.6%
	Other	21.9%

Turner	Martin	35.4%
	Hecht	52.1%
	Other	12.5%

Twiggs	Martin	43.9%
	Hecht	46.3%
	Other	9.8%

Union	Martin	54.3%
	Hecht	30.3%
	Other	15.4%

Upson	Martin	46.8%
	Hecht	38.6%
	Other	14.5%

Walker	Martin	48.6%
	Hecht	25.4%
	Other	26.1%

Walton	Martin	47.3%
	Hecht	32.1%
	Other	20.6%

Ware	Martin	33.4%
	Hecht	35.9%
	Other	30.7%

Warren	Martin	46.1%
	Hecht	43.9%
	Other	10.1%

Washington	Martin	40.4%
	Hecht	48.0%
	Other	11.6%

Wayne	Martin	37.7%
	Hecht	50.5%
	Other	11.8%

Webster	Martin	39.2%
	Hecht	46.6%
	Other	14.2%

Wheeler	Martin	47.6%
	Hecht	41.5%
	Other	11.0%

White	Martin	52.4%
	Hecht	31.0%
	Other	16.6%

Whitfield	Martin	51.2%
	Hecht	25.5%
	Other	23.3%

Wilcox	Martin	40.5%
	Hecht	49.7%
	Other	9.8%

Wilkes	Martin	41.4%
	Hecht	43.0%
	Other	15.6%

Wilkinson	Martin	42.1%
	Hecht	48.6%
	Other	9.3%

Worth	Martin	33.9%
	Hecht	54.4%
	Other	11.7%

National DataGraph for 2006 - Georgia Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved