Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-05-01

Map

Map

Allen	Sharp	31.5%
	Praeger	64.5%
	Other	4.0%

Anderson	Sharp	37.9%
	Praeger	57.0%
	Other	5.1%

Atchison	Sharp	45.1%
	Praeger	49.9%
	Other	5.0%

Barber	Sharp	27.4%
	Praeger	69.3%
	Other	3.2%

Barton	Sharp	21.0%
	Praeger	75.7%
	Other	3.3%

Bourbon	Sharp	37.2%
	Praeger	59.5%
	Other	3.3%

Brown	Sharp	25.6%
	Praeger	71.4%
	Other	2.9%

Butler	Sharp	29.6%
	Praeger	66.3%
	Other	4.1%

Chase	Sharp	24.9%
	Praeger	71.7%
	Other	3.5%

Chautauqua	Sharp	24.0%
	Praeger	71.0%
	Other	5.1%

Cherokee	Sharp	44.2%
	Praeger	52.2%
	Other	3.6%

Cheyenne	Sharp	22.0%
	Praeger	74.2%
	Other	3.8%

Clark	Sharp	18.9%
	Praeger	78.2%
	Other	2.8%

Clay	Sharp	16.0%
	Praeger	81.7%
	Other	2.3%

Cloud	Sharp	23.8%
	Praeger	71.7%
	Other	4.5%

Coffey	Sharp	21.3%
	Praeger	74.8%
	Other	3.9%

Comanche	Sharp	17.0%
	Praeger	80.2%
	Other	2.8%

Cowley	Sharp	32.4%
	Praeger	63.7%
	Other	3.9%

Crawford	Sharp	46.1%
	Praeger	49.6%
	Other	4.4%

Decatur	Sharp	24.5%
	Praeger	72.5%
	Other	3.0%

Dickinson	Sharp	23.7%
	Praeger	72.5%
	Other	3.8%

Doniphan	Sharp	32.7%
	Praeger	62.4%
	Other	4.8%

Douglas	Sharp	33.7%
	Praeger	60.3%
	Other	6.0%

Edwards	Sharp	22.5%
	Praeger	73.7%
	Other	3.9%

Elk	Sharp	29.1%
	Praeger	65.0%
	Other	5.9%

Ellis	Sharp	28.9%
	Praeger	67.4%
	Other	3.6%

Ellsworth	Sharp	25.9%
	Praeger	70.5%
	Other	3.6%

Finney	Sharp	26.3%
	Praeger	70.4%
	Other	3.2%

Ford	Sharp	24.4%
	Praeger	71.9%
	Other	3.7%

Franklin	Sharp	30.9%
	Praeger	63.9%
	Other	5.2%

Geary	Sharp	32.8%
	Praeger	63.9%
	Other	3.3%

Gove	Sharp	18.5%
	Praeger	78.3%
	Other	3.2%

Graham	Sharp	20.9%
	Praeger	75.6%
	Other	3.4%

Grant	Sharp	22.0%
	Praeger	75.8%
	Other	2.2%

Gray	Sharp	22.3%
	Praeger	74.5%
	Other	3.2%

Greeley	Sharp	15.1%
	Praeger	79.8%
	Other	5.1%

Greenwood	Sharp	27.0%
	Praeger	67.4%
	Other	5.6%

Hamilton	Sharp	20.7%
	Praeger	76.9%
	Other	2.4%

Harper	Sharp	24.3%
	Praeger	71.5%
	Other	4.1%

Harvey	Sharp	30.5%
	Praeger	65.5%
	Other	4.0%

Haskell	Sharp	14.5%
	Praeger	82.6%
	Other	2.9%

Hodgeman	Sharp	18.8%
	Praeger	79.0%
	Other	2.2%

Jackson	Sharp	26.5%
	Praeger	70.0%
	Other	3.5%

Jefferson	Sharp	29.5%
	Praeger	65.8%
	Other	4.7%

Jewell	Sharp	21.6%
	Praeger	73.2%
	Other	5.2%

Johnson	Sharp	34.3%
	Praeger	61.3%
	Other	4.4%

Kearny	Sharp	17.6%
	Praeger	79.1%
	Other	3.3%

Kingman	Sharp	23.7%
	Praeger	71.9%
	Other	4.4%

Kiowa	Sharp	17.8%
	Praeger	79.0%
	Other	3.2%

Labette	Sharp	39.1%
	Praeger	57.2%
	Other	3.7%

Lane	Sharp	15.6%
	Praeger	80.7%
	Other	3.8%

Leavenworth	Sharp	41.5%
	Praeger	53.9%
	Other	4.6%

Lincoln	Sharp	20.1%
	Praeger	76.2%
	Other	3.8%

Linn	Sharp	41.1%
	Praeger	53.5%
	Other	5.5%

Logan	Sharp	17.7%
	Praeger	79.6%
	Other	2.6%

Lyon	Sharp	29.8%
	Praeger	65.9%
	Other	4.3%

McPherson	Sharp	21.8%
	Praeger	74.0%
	Other	4.2%

Marion	Sharp	28.7%
	Praeger	67.7%
	Other	3.6%

Marshall	Sharp	22.8%
	Praeger	73.7%
	Other	3.6%

Meade	Sharp	16.6%
	Praeger	80.1%
	Other	3.3%

Miami	Sharp	35.2%
	Praeger	60.2%
	Other	4.6%

Mitchell	Sharp	21.8%
	Praeger	75.2%
	Other	3.0%

Montgomery	Sharp	33.0%
	Praeger	62.5%
	Other	4.5%

Morris	Sharp	24.3%
	Praeger	72.3%
	Other	3.4%

Morton	Sharp	21.1%
	Praeger	76.2%
	Other	2.7%

Nemaha	Sharp	21.4%
	Praeger	75.4%
	Other	3.2%

Neosho	Sharp	32.0%
	Praeger	63.9%
	Other	4.0%

Ness	Sharp	19.9%
	Praeger	78.0%
	Other	2.1%

Norton	Sharp	19.7%
	Praeger	76.3%
	Other	4.1%

Osage	Sharp	26.2%
	Praeger	68.3%
	Other	5.5%

Osborne	Sharp	21.9%
	Praeger	72.5%
	Other	5.7%

Ottawa	Sharp	19.4%
	Praeger	74.8%
	Other	5.7%

Pawnee	Sharp	22.4%
	Praeger	74.4%
	Other	3.2%

Phillips	Sharp	20.1%
	Praeger	76.4%
	Other	3.5%

Pottawatomie	Sharp	20.4%
	Praeger	74.0%
	Other	5.6%

Pratt	Sharp	25.1%
	Praeger	71.5%
	Other	3.5%

Rawlins	Sharp	17.3%
	Praeger	78.2%
	Other	4.6%

Reno	Sharp	27.5%
	Praeger	68.0%
	Other	4.4%

Republic	Sharp	25.3%
	Praeger	69.2%
	Other	5.4%

Rice	Sharp	22.1%
	Praeger	75.1%
	Other	2.8%

Riley	Sharp	31.5%
	Praeger	65.4%
	Other	3.1%

Rooks	Sharp	19.9%
	Praeger	76.1%
	Other	4.0%

Rush	Sharp	23.2%
	Praeger	72.0%
	Other	4.8%

Russell	Sharp	21.9%
	Praeger	73.9%
	Other	4.3%

Saline	Sharp	26.8%
	Praeger	68.6%
	Other	4.7%

Scott	Sharp	16.5%
	Praeger	80.2%
	Other	3.4%

Sedgwick	Sharp	34.0%
	Praeger	61.7%
	Other	4.3%

Seward	Sharp	22.4%
	Praeger	73.8%
	Other	3.8%

Shawnee	Sharp	31.1%
	Praeger	64.8%
	Other	4.2%

Sheridan	Sharp	21.1%
	Praeger	75.3%
	Other	3.5%

Sherman	Sharp	22.3%
	Praeger	72.8%
	Other	4.9%

Smith	Sharp	23.7%
	Praeger	71.6%
	Other	4.7%

Stafford	Sharp	22.1%
	Praeger	74.5%
	Other	3.4%

Stanton	Sharp	18.0%
	Praeger	79.0%
	Other	3.0%

Stevens	Sharp	17.0%
	Praeger	80.5%
	Other	2.5%

Sumner	Sharp	32.7%
	Praeger	62.8%
	Other	4.5%

Thomas	Sharp	21.2%
	Praeger	74.9%
	Other	3.9%

Trego	Sharp	24.0%
	Praeger	71.8%
	Other	4.2%

Wabaunsee	Sharp	22.1%
	Praeger	73.5%
	Other	4.4%

Wallace	Sharp	14.3%
	Praeger	81.5%
	Other	4.2%

Washington	Sharp	15.9%
	Praeger	79.0%
	Other	5.1%

Wichita	Sharp	21.8%
	Praeger	75.2%
	Other	2.9%

Wilson	Sharp	26.4%
	Praeger	68.8%
	Other	4.8%

Woodson	Sharp	28.4%
	Praeger	67.4%
	Other	4.3%

Wyandotte	Sharp	72.8%
	Praeger	23.8%
	Other	3.5%

National DataGraph for 2006 - Kansas Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved