Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alcona	Granholm	51.1%
	DeVos	47.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Alger	Granholm	60.7%
	DeVos	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Allegan	Granholm	43.8%
	DeVos	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Alpena	Granholm	59.7%
	DeVos	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Antrim	Granholm	44.8%
	DeVos	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Arenac	Granholm	56.2%
	DeVos	42.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Baraga	Granholm	60.4%
	DeVos	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Barry	Granholm	47.8%
	DeVos	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Bay	Granholm	60.9%
	DeVos	37.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Benzie	Granholm	52.8%
	DeVos	45.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Berrien	Granholm	46.5%
	DeVos	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Branch	Granholm	48.0%
	DeVos	50.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Calhoun	Granholm	56.6%
	DeVos	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Cass	Granholm	50.3%
	DeVos	48.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Charlevoix	Granholm	47.1%
	DeVos	50.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Cheboygan	Granholm	47.2%
	DeVos	51.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Chippewa	Granholm	56.5%
	DeVos	42.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Clare	Granholm	51.7%
	DeVos	46.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Clinton	Granholm	54.2%
	DeVos	44.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Crawford	Granholm	50.5%
	DeVos	47.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Delta	Granholm	58.8%
	DeVos	40.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Dickinson	Granholm	53.8%
	DeVos	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Eaton	Granholm	57.6%
	DeVos	41.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Emmet	Granholm	45.5%
	DeVos	52.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Genesee	Granholm	65.8%
	DeVos	33.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Gladwin	Granholm	51.9%
	DeVos	46.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Gogebic	Granholm	62.0%
	DeVos	36.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Grand Traverse	Granholm	47.5%
	DeVos	51.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Gratiot	Granholm	54.4%
	DeVos	44.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Hillsdale	Granholm	40.8%
	DeVos	57.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Houghton	Granholm	54.3%
	DeVos	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Huron	Granholm	49.2%
	DeVos	49.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Ingham	Granholm	66.4%
	DeVos	32.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Ionia	Granholm	52.1%
	DeVos	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Iosco	Granholm	53.9%
	DeVos	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Iron	Granholm	58.8%
	DeVos	39.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Isabella	Granholm	56.5%
	DeVos	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Jackson	Granholm	50.1%
	DeVos	48.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Kalamazoo	Granholm	59.5%
	DeVos	39.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Kalkaska	Granholm	44.0%
	DeVos	54.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Kent	Granholm	45.7%
	DeVos	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Keweenaw	Granholm	54.4%
	DeVos	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Lake	Granholm	49.3%
	DeVos	48.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lapeer	Granholm	45.8%
	DeVos	52.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Leelanau	Granholm	51.4%
	DeVos	47.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Lenawee	Granholm	47.1%
	DeVos	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Livingston	Granholm	41.6%
	DeVos	57.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Luce	Granholm	64.7%
	DeVos	34.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Mackinac	Granholm	52.5%
	DeVos	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Macomb	Granholm	52.2%
	DeVos	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Manistee	Granholm	54.4%
	DeVos	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Marquette	Granholm	67.0%
	DeVos	31.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Mason	Granholm	50.5%
	DeVos	48.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Mecosta	Granholm	47.7%
	DeVos	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Menominee	Granholm	53.7%
	DeVos	44.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Midland	Granholm	49.5%
	DeVos	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Missaukee	Granholm	35.6%
	DeVos	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Monroe	Granholm	53.9%
	DeVos	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Montcalm	Granholm	53.3%
	DeVos	45.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Montmorency	Granholm	46.2%
	DeVos	51.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Muskegon	Granholm	63.5%
	DeVos	35.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Newaygo	Granholm	47.0%
	DeVos	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Oakland	Granholm	54.0%
	DeVos	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Oceana	Granholm	52.2%
	DeVos	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Ogemaw	Granholm	51.8%
	DeVos	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Ontonagon	Granholm	56.6%
	DeVos	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Osceola	Granholm	41.7%
	DeVos	56.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Oscoda	Granholm	46.1%
	DeVos	52.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Otsego	Granholm	43.4%
	DeVos	54.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Ottawa	Granholm	33.9%
	DeVos	65.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Presque Isle	Granholm	55.1%
	DeVos	43.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Roscommon	Granholm	52.7%
	DeVos	45.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Saginaw	Granholm	61.0%
	DeVos	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

St. Clair	Granholm	48.5%
	DeVos	49.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

St. Joseph	Granholm	46.2%
	DeVos	52.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Sanilac	Granholm	42.0%
	DeVos	56.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Schoolcraft	Granholm	57.6%
	DeVos	40.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Shiawassee	Granholm	56.6%
	DeVos	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Tuscola	Granholm	51.5%
	DeVos	46.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Van Buren	Granholm	55.3%
	DeVos	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Washtenaw	Granholm	68.0%
	DeVos	30.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Wayne	Granholm	71.6%
	DeVos	27.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Wexford	Granholm	45.6%
	DeVos	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 2006 - Michigan Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved