Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Aitkin	Franken	41.6%
	Coleman	38.6%
	Barkley	18.9%
	Other	0.8%

Anoka	Franken	36.9%
	Coleman	45.5%
	Barkley	16.8%
	Other	0.8%

Becker	Franken	35.7%
	Coleman	50.0%
	Barkley	13.2%
	Other	1.1%

Beltrami	Franken	45.6%
	Coleman	43.0%
	Barkley	10.3%
	Other	1.1%

Benton	Franken	33.8%
	Coleman	44.1%
	Barkley	21.2%
	Other	0.9%

Big Stone	Franken	42.7%
	Coleman	40.6%
	Barkley	16.0%
	Other	0.7%

Blue Earth	Franken	41.7%
	Coleman	39.4%
	Barkley	17.8%
	Other	1.1%

Brown	Franken	32.7%
	Coleman	46.7%
	Barkley	19.8%
	Other	0.8%

Carlton	Franken	51.9%
	Coleman	33.3%
	Barkley	13.9%
	Other	0.9%

Carver	Franken	28.6%
	Coleman	54.7%
	Barkley	16.0%
	Other	0.8%

Cass	Franken	36.3%
	Coleman	47.4%
	Barkley	15.4%
	Other	0.9%

Chippewa	Franken	40.5%
	Coleman	38.3%
	Barkley	20.3%
	Other	1.0%

Chisago	Franken	33.7%
	Coleman	47.2%
	Barkley	18.2%
	Other	0.8%

Clay	Franken	41.9%
	Coleman	45.2%
	Barkley	11.9%
	Other	1.0%

Clearwater	Franken	37.9%
	Coleman	50.1%
	Barkley	10.9%
	Other	1.0%

Cook	Franken	48.7%
	Coleman	36.3%
	Barkley	13.8%
	Other	1.3%

Cottonwood	Franken	35.4%
	Coleman	46.0%
	Barkley	17.5%
	Other	1.1%

Crow Wing	Franken	37.3%
	Coleman	46.1%
	Barkley	15.7%
	Other	0.9%

Dakota	Franken	38.1%
	Coleman	45.9%
	Barkley	15.2%
	Other	0.8%

Dodge	Franken	33.4%
	Coleman	47.1%
	Barkley	18.3%
	Other	1.2%

Douglas	Franken	33.0%
	Coleman	48.4%
	Barkley	17.9%
	Other	0.7%

Faribault	Franken	35.9%
	Coleman	44.4%
	Barkley	18.6%
	Other	1.1%

Fillmore	Franken	41.6%
	Coleman	42.9%
	Barkley	14.4%
	Other	1.1%

Freeborn	Franken	43.4%
	Coleman	38.4%
	Barkley	17.1%
	Other	1.2%

Goodhue	Franken	36.0%
	Coleman	43.5%
	Barkley	19.7%
	Other	0.8%

Grant	Franken	40.8%
	Coleman	41.2%
	Barkley	17.5%
	Other	0.4%

Hennepin	Franken	50.1%
	Coleman	36.2%
	Barkley	12.9%
	Other	0.8%

Houston	Franken	43.1%
	Coleman	47.1%
	Barkley	8.8%
	Other	1.0%

Hubbard	Franken	34.8%
	Coleman	49.7%
	Barkley	14.6%
	Other	0.9%

Isanti	Franken	32.9%
	Coleman	48.0%
	Barkley	18.3%
	Other	0.9%

Itasca	Franken	47.6%
	Coleman	38.2%
	Barkley	13.1%
	Other	1.0%

Jackson	Franken	38.2%
	Coleman	44.1%
	Barkley	16.5%
	Other	1.2%

Kanabec	Franken	35.2%
	Coleman	44.3%
	Barkley	19.3%
	Other	1.2%

Kandiyohi	Franken	36.8%
	Coleman	47.0%
	Barkley	15.5%
	Other	0.7%

Kittson	Franken	45.8%
	Coleman	42.2%
	Barkley	10.9%
	Other	1.2%

Koochiching	Franken	45.9%
	Coleman	42.3%
	Barkley	10.7%
	Other	1.0%

Lac Qui Parle	Franken	41.9%
	Coleman	38.6%
	Barkley	18.7%
	Other	0.8%

Lake	Franken	51.4%
	Coleman	35.3%
	Barkley	12.5%
	Other	0.8%

Lake of the Woods	Franken	34.0%
	Coleman	53.1%
	Barkley	11.4%
	Other	1.5%

Le Sueur	Franken	35.2%
	Coleman	42.2%
	Barkley	21.8%
	Other	0.8%

Lincoln	Franken	40.9%
	Coleman	47.1%
	Barkley	11.0%
	Other	1.0%

Lyon	Franken	35.0%
	Coleman	48.3%
	Barkley	15.8%
	Other	1.0%

McLeod	Franken	29.0%
	Coleman	47.9%
	Barkley	21.9%
	Other	1.2%

Mahnomen	Franken	49.1%
	Coleman	36.9%
	Barkley	12.9%
	Other	1.1%

Marshall	Franken	37.2%
	Coleman	49.3%
	Barkley	12.7%
	Other	0.9%

Martin	Franken	33.6%
	Coleman	47.9%
	Barkley	17.5%
	Other	1.0%

Meeker	Franken	31.0%
	Coleman	45.6%
	Barkley	22.4%
	Other	1.1%

Mille Lacs	Franken	35.7%
	Coleman	43.5%
	Barkley	19.7%
	Other	1.2%

Morrison	Franken	32.5%
	Coleman	46.9%
	Barkley	19.6%
	Other	0.9%

Mower	Franken	47.8%
	Coleman	36.0%
	Barkley	15.0%
	Other	1.2%

Murray	Franken	38.9%
	Coleman	48.7%
	Barkley	11.7%
	Other	0.8%

Nicollet	Franken	40.8%
	Coleman	40.0%
	Barkley	18.3%
	Other	0.8%

Nobles	Franken	40.5%
	Coleman	48.1%
	Barkley	10.4%
	Other	1.1%

Norman	Franken	46.2%
	Coleman	39.1%
	Barkley	13.5%
	Other	1.2%

Olmsted	Franken	37.9%
	Coleman	46.9%
	Barkley	14.2%
	Other	1.0%

Otter Tail	Franken	33.1%
	Coleman	52.9%
	Barkley	13.1%
	Other	0.9%

Pennington	Franken	38.5%
	Coleman	48.1%
	Barkley	12.2%
	Other	1.2%

Pine	Franken	41.9%
	Coleman	39.6%
	Barkley	17.4%
	Other	1.1%

Pipestone	Franken	35.5%
	Coleman	55.6%
	Barkley	7.8%
	Other	1.1%

Polk	Franken	39.1%
	Coleman	48.6%
	Barkley	11.3%
	Other	1.0%

Pope	Franken	39.2%
	Coleman	42.1%
	Barkley	17.9%
	Other	0.7%

Ramsey	Franken	51.8%
	Coleman	33.9%
	Barkley	13.4%
	Other	0.9%

Red Lake	Franken	38.6%
	Coleman	45.6%
	Barkley	14.4%
	Other	1.3%

Redwood	Franken	31.6%
	Coleman	47.0%
	Barkley	20.2%
	Other	1.2%

Renville	Franken	35.9%
	Coleman	40.4%
	Barkley	22.9%
	Other	0.9%

Rice	Franken	43.5%
	Coleman	38.4%
	Barkley	17.3%
	Other	0.8%

Rock	Franken	35.8%
	Coleman	54.3%
	Barkley	8.7%
	Other	1.3%

Roseau	Franken	31.7%
	Coleman	57.5%
	Barkley	9.7%
	Other	1.1%

St. Louis	Franken	54.6%
	Coleman	32.4%
	Barkley	12.1%
	Other	0.8%

Scott	Franken	31.0%
	Coleman	50.8%
	Barkley	17.4%
	Other	0.8%

Sherburne	Franken	30.0%
	Coleman	51.2%
	Barkley	18.0%
	Other	0.8%

Sibley	Franken	28.0%
	Coleman	45.4%
	Barkley	25.6%
	Other	1.0%

Stearns	Franken	33.5%
	Coleman	46.4%
	Barkley	19.2%
	Other	0.9%

Steele	Franken	33.5%
	Coleman	44.2%
	Barkley	21.3%
	Other	0.9%

Stevens	Franken	40.1%
	Coleman	45.0%
	Barkley	14.0%
	Other	0.9%

Swift	Franken	43.9%
	Coleman	35.9%
	Barkley	19.3%
	Other	0.9%

Todd	Franken	34.3%
	Coleman	45.5%
	Barkley	19.3%
	Other	1.0%

Traverse	Franken	39.2%
	Coleman	41.3%
	Barkley	18.8%
	Other	0.7%

Wabasha	Franken	37.8%
	Coleman	41.9%
	Barkley	19.5%
	Other	0.8%

Wadena	Franken	32.1%
	Coleman	51.5%
	Barkley	15.5%
	Other	1.0%

Waseca	Franken	33.1%
	Coleman	42.9%
	Barkley	23.2%
	Other	0.9%

Washington	Franken	37.2%
	Coleman	46.9%
	Barkley	15.2%
	Other	0.7%

Watonwan	Franken	38.5%
	Coleman	40.2%
	Barkley	20.3%
	Other	1.0%

Wilkin	Franken	31.8%
	Coleman	53.7%
	Barkley	13.4%
	Other	1.0%

Winona	Franken	46.8%
	Coleman	41.5%
	Barkley	10.2%
	Other	1.4%

Wright	Franken	28.6%
	Coleman	50.6%
	Barkley	19.9%
	Other	0.8%

Yellow Medicine	Franken	39.1%
	Coleman	41.6%
	Barkley	18.5%
	Other	0.9%

National DataGraph for 2008 - Minnesota Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved