2012 Attorney General General Election Data Graphs - Missouri
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2012-12-25

Map

AdairKoster51.8%
 
Martin44.8%
 
Other3.4%
 


AndrewKoster44.6%
 
Martin51.2%
 
Other4.1%
 


AtchisonKoster37.7%
 
Martin56.7%
 
Other5.6%
 


AudrainKoster52.8%
 
Martin43.4%
 
Other3.8%
 


BarryKoster43.1%
 
Martin52.2%
 
Other4.7%
 


BartonKoster31.9%
 
Martin64.2%
 
Other3.9%
 


BatesKoster55.0%
 
Martin41.9%
 
Other3.1%
 


BentonKoster47.6%
 
Martin48.5%
 
Other3.9%
 


BollingerKoster38.7%
 
Martin57.4%
 
Other3.9%
 


BooneKoster59.9%
 
Martin35.2%
 
Other4.9%
 


BuchananKoster55.6%
 
Martin39.8%
 
Other4.6%
 


ButlerKoster39.6%
 
Martin56.7%
 
Other3.7%
 


CaldwellKoster46.8%
 
Martin47.1%
 
Other6.1%
 


CallawayKoster50.0%
 
Martin45.6%
 
Other4.4%
 


CamdenKoster43.2%
 
Martin52.9%
 
Other3.9%
 


Cape GirardeauKoster38.9%
 
Martin57.5%
 
Other3.6%
 


CarrollKoster47.4%
 
Martin49.1%
 
Other3.4%
 


CarterKoster45.0%
 
Martin50.7%
 
Other4.3%
 


CassKoster54.0%
 
Martin42.9%
 
Other3.1%
 


CedarKoster42.2%
 
Martin54.0%
 
Other3.7%
 


CharitonKoster54.5%
 
Martin42.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


ChristianKoster41.1%
 
Martin55.6%
 
Other3.3%
 


ClarkKoster53.7%
 
Martin42.2%
 
Other4.2%
 


ClayKoster55.9%
 
Martin40.0%
 
Other4.1%
 


ClintonKoster52.2%
 
Martin43.2%
 
Other4.7%
 


ColeKoster53.8%
 
Martin43.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


CooperKoster46.9%
 
Martin48.6%
 
Other4.5%
 


CrawfordKoster45.9%
 
Martin51.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


DadeKoster41.5%
 
Martin55.2%
 
Other3.3%
 


DallasKoster47.6%
 
Martin48.1%
 
Other4.3%
 


DaviessKoster51.0%
 
Martin44.7%
 
Other4.3%
 


DeKalbKoster46.0%
 
Martin49.8%
 
Other4.2%
 


DentKoster45.1%
 
Martin50.6%
 
Other4.4%
 


DouglasKoster42.7%
 
Martin52.6%
 
Other4.7%
 


DunklinKoster54.5%
 
Martin42.6%
 
Other2.9%
 


FranklinKoster49.2%
 
Martin46.7%
 
Other4.1%
 


GasconadeKoster45.0%
 
Martin52.1%
 
Other2.9%
 


GentryKoster50.3%
 
Martin45.0%
 
Other4.7%
 


GreeneKoster49.7%
 
Martin46.2%
 
Other4.1%
 


GrundyKoster44.1%
 
Martin51.6%
 
Other4.4%
 


HarrisonKoster41.3%
 
Martin54.9%
 
Other3.8%
 


HenryKoster57.3%
 
Martin38.8%
 
Other3.9%
 


HickoryKoster54.0%
 
Martin41.3%
 
Other4.7%
 


HoltKoster40.5%
 
Martin56.3%
 
Other3.2%
 


HowardKoster54.0%
 
Martin41.2%
 
Other4.8%
 


HowellKoster44.8%
 
Martin50.8%
 
Other4.3%
 


IronKoster60.6%
 
Martin35.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


JacksonKoster67.0%
 
Martin29.8%
 
Other3.2%
 


JasperKoster38.5%
 
Martin56.8%
 
Other4.7%
 


JeffersonKoster52.8%
 
Martin43.3%
 
Other3.9%
 


JohnsonKoster55.2%
 
Martin40.2%
 
Other4.6%
 


KnoxKoster52.7%
 
Martin44.6%
 
Other2.7%
 


LacledeKoster44.3%
 
Martin51.5%
 
Other4.1%
 


LafayetteKoster52.1%
 
Martin44.3%
 
Other3.5%
 


LawrenceKoster40.3%
 
Martin55.7%
 
Other4.0%
 


LewisKoster47.0%
 
Martin48.8%
 
Other4.2%
 


LincolnKoster48.8%
 
Martin47.2%
 
Other4.0%
 


LinnKoster55.6%
 
Martin40.2%
 
Other4.2%
 


LivingstonKoster47.7%
 
Martin48.5%
 
Other3.9%
 


McDonaldKoster33.8%
 
Martin60.0%
 
Other6.2%
 


MaconKoster48.0%
 
Martin49.2%
 
Other2.8%
 


MadisonKoster49.6%
 
Martin46.5%
 
Other3.9%
 


MariesKoster52.1%
 
Martin44.8%
 
Other3.1%
 


MarionKoster44.3%
 
Martin52.5%
 
Other3.2%
 


MercerKoster37.5%
 
Martin59.3%
 
Other3.1%
 


MillerKoster40.5%
 
Martin55.3%
 
Other4.2%
 


MississippiKoster57.4%
 
Martin39.1%
 
Other3.5%
 


MoniteauKoster48.7%
 
Martin47.9%
 
Other3.4%
 


MonroeKoster50.6%
 
Martin45.3%
 
Other4.0%
 


MontgomeryKoster49.2%
 
Martin47.0%
 
Other3.9%
 


MorganKoster47.4%
 
Martin48.3%
 
Other4.4%
 


New MadridKoster58.3%
 
Martin38.7%
 
Other3.0%
 


NewtonKoster35.9%
 
Martin59.6%
 
Other4.5%
 


NodawayKoster50.9%
 
Martin44.9%
 
Other4.2%
 


OregonKoster51.3%
 
Martin45.4%
 
Other3.2%
 


OsageKoster48.9%
 
Martin48.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


OzarkKoster46.1%
 
Martin48.9%
 
Other5.0%
 


PemiscotKoster55.9%
 
Martin41.2%
 
Other2.9%
 


PerryKoster44.2%
 
Martin53.1%
 
Other2.6%
 


PettisKoster49.3%
 
Martin46.4%
 
Other4.3%
 


PhelpsKoster46.7%
 
Martin49.0%
 
Other4.3%
 


PikeKoster50.8%
 
Martin45.9%
 
Other3.4%
 


PlatteKoster53.0%
 
Martin42.9%
 
Other4.1%
 


PolkKoster44.2%
 
Martin51.7%
 
Other4.1%
 


PulaskiKoster47.1%
 
Martin48.9%
 
Other4.0%
 


PutnamKoster34.2%
 
Martin61.9%
 
Other4.0%
 


RallsKoster47.0%
 
Martin50.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


RandolphKoster49.9%
 
Martin45.8%
 
Other4.2%
 


RayKoster56.7%
 
Martin38.7%
 
Other4.6%
 


ReynoldsKoster60.4%
 
Martin35.1%
 
Other4.5%
 


RipleyKoster41.8%
 
Martin53.7%
 
Other4.4%
 


St. CharlesKoster50.0%
 
Martin46.6%
 
Other3.4%
 


St. ClairKoster49.8%
 
Martin46.1%
 
Other4.2%
 


Ste. GenevieveKoster59.3%
 
Martin37.4%
 
Other3.2%
 


St. FrancoisKoster54.5%
 
Martin41.8%
 
Other3.6%
 


St. LouisKoster63.6%
 
Martin34.1%
 
Other2.4%
 


SalineKoster60.6%
 
Martin34.8%
 
Other4.7%
 


SchuylerKoster48.2%
 
Martin45.8%
 
Other6.0%
 


ScotlandKoster48.4%
 
Martin47.7%
 
Other4.0%
 


ScottKoster47.5%
 
Martin49.8%
 
Other2.7%
 


ShannonKoster56.3%
 
Martin39.4%
 
Other4.3%
 


ShelbyKoster46.4%
 
Martin50.8%
 
Other2.8%
 


StoddardKoster44.2%
 
Martin52.5%
 
Other3.4%
 


StoneKoster41.0%
 
Martin55.1%
 
Other3.9%
 


SullivanKoster49.5%
 
Martin47.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


TaneyKoster37.9%
 
Martin58.2%
 
Other3.9%
 


TexasKoster47.2%
 
Martin48.5%
 
Other4.3%
 


VernonKoster48.4%
 
Martin47.3%
 
Other4.2%
 


WarrenKoster46.9%
 
Martin49.5%
 
Other3.7%
 


WashingtonKoster55.5%
 
Martin40.5%
 
Other3.9%
 


WayneKoster50.0%
 
Martin46.6%
 
Other3.4%
 


WebsterKoster46.5%
 
Martin49.7%
 
Other3.8%
 


WorthKoster48.3%
 
Martin46.8%
 
Other4.9%
 


WrightKoster41.4%
 
Martin54.8%
 
Other3.8%
 


City

St. LouisKoster84.7%
 
Martin12.6%
 
Other2.7%
 



National DataGraph for 2012 - Missouri Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved