Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

2014 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - Michigan

by County

Map

Map

Alcona	Schauer	40.4%
	Snyder	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Alger	Schauer	50.1%
	Snyder	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Allegan	Schauer	31.6%
	Snyder	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Alpena	Schauer	47.3%
	Snyder	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Antrim	Schauer	35.8%
	Snyder	61.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Arenac	Schauer	45.7%
	Snyder	50.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Baraga	Schauer	50.2%
	Snyder	47.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Barry	Schauer	33.7%
	Snyder	63.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Bay	Schauer	50.5%
	Snyder	46.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Benzie	Schauer	44.0%
	Snyder	52.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Berrien	Schauer	41.5%
	Snyder	55.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Branch	Schauer	34.6%
	Snyder	62.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Calhoun	Schauer	44.0%
	Snyder	53.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Cass	Schauer	40.4%
	Snyder	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Charlevoix	Schauer	37.9%
	Snyder	59.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Cheboygan	Schauer	41.8%
	Snyder	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Chippewa	Schauer	46.6%
	Snyder	50.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Clare	Schauer	45.5%
	Snyder	50.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Clinton	Schauer	43.7%
	Snyder	54.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Crawford	Schauer	41.2%
	Snyder	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Delta	Schauer	45.1%
	Snyder	52.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Dickinson	Schauer	39.4%
	Snyder	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Eaton	Schauer	49.4%
	Snyder	48.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Emmet	Schauer	35.2%
	Snyder	61.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Genesee	Schauer	60.5%
	Snyder	37.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Gladwin	Schauer	43.4%
	Snyder	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Gogebic	Schauer	52.1%
	Snyder	45.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Grand Traverse	Schauer	38.9%
	Snyder	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Gratiot	Schauer	45.6%
	Snyder	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Hillsdale	Schauer	34.5%
	Snyder	62.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Houghton	Schauer	42.9%
	Snyder	53.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Huron	Schauer	37.0%
	Snyder	60.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Ingham	Schauer	57.5%
	Snyder	40.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Ionia	Schauer	39.4%
	Snyder	57.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Iosco	Schauer	43.0%
	Snyder	53.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Iron	Schauer	43.5%
	Snyder	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Isabella	Schauer	47.9%
	Snyder	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Jackson	Schauer	42.3%
	Snyder	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Kalamazoo	Schauer	46.2%
	Snyder	51.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Kalkaska	Schauer	38.1%
	Snyder	57.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Kent	Schauer	35.7%
	Snyder	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Keweenaw	Schauer	39.9%
	Snyder	57.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Lake	Schauer	47.0%
	Snyder	49.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Lapeer	Schauer	39.2%
	Snyder	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Leelanau	Schauer	41.8%
	Snyder	56.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Lenawee	Schauer	43.6%
	Snyder	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Livingston	Schauer	30.7%
	Snyder	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Luce	Schauer	42.3%
	Snyder	54.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Mackinac	Schauer	44.3%
	Snyder	53.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Macomb	Schauer	44.0%
	Snyder	53.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Manistee	Schauer	50.3%
	Snyder	47.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Marquette	Schauer	56.0%
	Snyder	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Mason	Schauer	43.0%
	Snyder	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Mecosta	Schauer	41.5%
	Snyder	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Menominee	Schauer	42.0%
	Snyder	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Midland	Schauer	36.5%
	Snyder	60.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Missaukee	Schauer	31.6%
	Snyder	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Monroe	Schauer	45.6%
	Snyder	51.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Montcalm	Schauer	38.9%
	Snyder	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Montmorency	Schauer	42.3%
	Snyder	54.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Muskegon	Schauer	50.4%
	Snyder	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Newaygo	Schauer	34.6%
	Snyder	61.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Oakland	Schauer	42.8%
	Snyder	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Oceana	Schauer	36.8%
	Snyder	60.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Ogemaw	Schauer	44.3%
	Snyder	51.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Ontonagon	Schauer	45.6%
	Snyder	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Osceola	Schauer	36.5%
	Snyder	59.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Oscoda	Schauer	41.7%
	Snyder	53.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Otsego	Schauer	37.6%
	Snyder	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Ottawa	Schauer	24.5%
	Snyder	73.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Presque Isle	Schauer	44.9%
	Snyder	52.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Roscommon	Schauer	44.2%
	Snyder	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Saginaw	Schauer	52.7%
	Snyder	45.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

St. Clair	Schauer	41.6%
	Snyder	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

St. Joseph	Schauer	35.6%
	Snyder	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Sanilac	Schauer	33.9%
	Snyder	63.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Schoolcraft	Schauer	45.7%
	Snyder	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Shiawassee	Schauer	46.3%
	Snyder	50.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Tuscola	Schauer	42.1%
	Snyder	54.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Van Buren	Schauer	41.6%
	Snyder	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Washtenaw	Schauer	56.5%
	Snyder	41.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Wayne	Schauer	63.5%
	Snyder	34.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Wexford	Schauer	38.2%
	Snyder	58.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

National DataGraph for 2014 - Michigan Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved

Note: The advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.