Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-01

Map

Map

Abbeville	Bowers	5.1%
	Graham	60.2%
	Bright	12.2%
	Other	22.5%

Aiken	Bowers	7.2%
	Graham	51.3%
	Bright	11.1%
	Other	30.4%

Allendale	Bowers	17.1%
	Graham	56.1%
	Bright	7.3%
	Other	19.5%

Anderson	Bowers	6.4%
	Graham	54.0%
	Bright	12.6%
	Other	27.0%

Bamberg	Bowers	6.7%
	Graham	69.7%
	Bright	5.6%
	Other	18.0%

Barnwell	Bowers	6.4%
	Graham	67.2%
	Bright	6.7%
	Other	19.7%

Beaufort	Bowers	9.5%
	Graham	61.9%
	Bright	10.6%
	Other	18.0%

Berkeley	Bowers	5.9%
	Graham	56.3%
	Bright	16.7%
	Other	21.1%

Calhoun	Bowers	5.4%
	Graham	59.4%
	Bright	8.6%
	Other	26.6%

Charleston	Bowers	4.2%
	Graham	63.6%
	Bright	16.5%
	Other	15.7%

Cherokee	Bowers	6.0%
	Graham	54.7%
	Bright	19.7%
	Other	19.6%

Chester	Bowers	4.0%
	Graham	55.2%
	Bright	18.4%
	Other	22.4%

Chesterfield	Bowers	6.4%
	Graham	55.8%
	Bright	13.0%
	Other	24.7%

Clarendon	Bowers	11.2%
	Graham	66.3%
	Bright	5.7%
	Other	16.8%

Colleton	Bowers	4.9%
	Graham	73.2%
	Bright	8.4%
	Other	13.6%

Darlington	Bowers	11.3%
	Graham	62.6%
	Bright	8.9%
	Other	17.2%

Dillon	Bowers	9.6%
	Graham	70.6%
	Bright	7.9%
	Other	11.9%

Dorchester	Bowers	5.8%
	Graham	54.3%
	Bright	19.3%
	Other	20.6%

Edgefield	Bowers	6.2%
	Graham	38.9%
	Bright	9.3%
	Other	45.6%

Fairfield	Bowers	16.2%
	Graham	56.0%
	Bright	13.7%
	Other	14.2%

Florence	Bowers	9.4%
	Graham	60.0%
	Bright	7.9%
	Other	22.7%

Georgetown	Bowers	14.8%
	Graham	67.9%
	Bright	5.1%
	Other	12.1%

Greenville	Bowers	5.9%
	Graham	41.1%
	Bright	26.7%
	Other	26.4%

Greenwood	Bowers	3.9%
	Graham	63.7%
	Bright	8.4%
	Other	23.9%

Hampton	Bowers	23.6%
	Graham	49.7%
	Bright	9.1%
	Other	17.6%

Horry	Bowers	7.5%
	Graham	67.2%
	Bright	7.9%
	Other	17.4%

Jasper	Bowers	16.0%
	Graham	52.6%
	Bright	11.4%
	Other	20.0%

Kershaw	Bowers	7.8%
	Graham	66.2%
	Bright	7.4%
	Other	18.6%

Lancaster	Bowers	5.0%
	Graham	62.6%
	Bright	13.2%
	Other	19.1%

Laurens	Bowers	10.6%
	Graham	47.5%
	Bright	26.6%
	Other	15.3%

Lee	Bowers	10.8%
	Graham	66.6%
	Bright	9.0%
	Other	13.6%

Lexington	Bowers	10.3%
	Graham	58.0%
	Bright	12.7%
	Other	18.9%

McCormick	Bowers	2.7%
	Graham	52.0%
	Bright	6.8%
	Other	38.6%

Marion	Bowers	8.1%
	Graham	69.5%
	Bright	5.5%
	Other	16.9%

Marlboro	Bowers	7.5%
	Graham	75.8%
	Bright	3.6%
	Other	13.1%

Newberry	Bowers	7.3%
	Graham	64.9%
	Bright	11.0%
	Other	16.8%

Oconee	Bowers	3.4%
	Graham	69.1%
	Bright	6.4%
	Other	21.2%

Orangeburg	Bowers	4.3%
	Graham	65.5%
	Bright	4.0%
	Other	26.1%

Pickens	Bowers	4.0%
	Graham	54.5%
	Bright	15.0%
	Other	26.5%

Richland	Bowers	13.0%
	Graham	63.4%
	Bright	8.6%
	Other	15.0%

Saluda	Bowers	8.6%
	Graham	67.7%
	Bright	6.5%
	Other	17.2%

Spartanburg	Bowers	5.6%
	Graham	43.4%
	Bright	33.4%
	Other	17.6%

Sumter	Bowers	22.1%
	Graham	57.2%
	Bright	7.9%
	Other	12.8%

Union	Bowers	5.4%
	Graham	48.1%
	Bright	29.3%
	Other	17.2%

Williamsburg	Bowers	4.8%
	Graham	75.9%
	Bright	4.9%
	Other	14.5%

York	Bowers	4.3%
	Graham	50.7%
	Bright	19.1%
	Other	25.8%

National DataGraph for 2014 - South Carolina Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved