Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Bayh	29.2%
	Young	64.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Allen	Bayh	40.5%
	Young	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Bartholomew	Bayh	35.2%
	Young	59.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Benton	Bayh	30.6%
	Young	62.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.7%

Blackford	Bayh	35.4%
	Young	57.0%
		0.0%
	Other	7.6%

Boone	Bayh	32.8%
	Young	61.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Brown	Bayh	36.4%
	Young	57.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Carroll	Bayh	29.0%
	Young	63.5%
		0.0%
	Other	7.5%

Cass	Bayh	34.6%
	Young	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	7.1%

Clark	Bayh	41.9%
	Young	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Clay	Bayh	35.8%
	Young	57.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Clinton	Bayh	31.5%
	Young	62.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Crawford	Bayh	41.5%
	Young	54.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Daviess	Bayh	29.3%
	Young	66.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Dearborn	Bayh	22.4%
	Young	73.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Decatur	Bayh	27.7%
	Young	66.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

DeKalb	Bayh	30.2%
	Young	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	8.5%

Delaware	Bayh	45.8%
	Young	48.0%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Dubois	Bayh	39.1%
	Young	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Elkhart	Bayh	35.4%
	Young	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Fayette	Bayh	33.8%
	Young	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Floyd	Bayh	41.2%
	Young	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Fountain	Bayh	27.6%
	Young	66.4%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Franklin	Bayh	24.1%
	Young	72.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Fulton	Bayh	33.2%
	Young	60.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Gibson	Bayh	35.6%
	Young	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Grant	Bayh	33.0%
	Young	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Greene	Bayh	37.1%
	Young	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Hamilton	Bayh	35.9%
	Young	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Hancock	Bayh	29.6%
	Young	63.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Harrison	Bayh	35.4%
	Young	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Hendricks	Bayh	32.6%
	Young	62.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Henry	Bayh	34.3%
	Young	57.9%
		0.0%
	Other	7.7%

Howard	Bayh	38.6%
	Young	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Huntington	Bayh	28.8%
	Young	63.1%
		0.0%
	Other	8.1%

Jackson	Bayh	31.9%
	Young	64.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Jasper	Bayh	31.0%
	Young	64.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Jay	Bayh	34.7%
	Young	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	7.6%

Jefferson	Bayh	40.4%
	Young	56.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Jennings	Bayh	33.2%
	Young	62.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Johnson	Bayh	29.7%
	Young	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Knox	Bayh	43.0%
	Young	51.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Kosciusko	Bayh	24.9%
	Young	68.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

LaGrange	Bayh	28.9%
	Young	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

Lake	Bayh	61.9%
	Young	34.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

LaPorte	Bayh	49.9%
	Young	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Lawrence	Bayh	29.2%
	Young	65.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Madison	Bayh	41.1%
	Young	52.0%
		0.0%
	Other	6.8%

Marion	Bayh	58.5%
	Young	36.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Marshall	Bayh	34.7%
	Young	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Martin	Bayh	33.3%
	Young	61.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Miami	Bayh	28.9%
	Young	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	7.6%

Monroe	Bayh	58.3%
	Young	35.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Montgomery	Bayh	28.9%
	Young	64.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

Morgan	Bayh	25.2%
	Young	68.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Newton	Bayh	31.0%
	Young	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Noble	Bayh	29.9%
	Young	62.8%
		0.0%
	Other	7.3%

Ohio	Bayh	29.5%
	Young	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Orange	Bayh	34.0%
	Young	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Owen	Bayh	31.0%
	Young	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Parke	Bayh	35.3%
	Young	58.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Perry	Bayh	49.9%
	Young	45.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Pike	Bayh	37.5%
	Young	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Porter	Bayh	48.0%
	Young	46.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Posey	Bayh	38.8%
	Young	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Pulaski	Bayh	34.8%
	Young	58.2%
		0.0%
	Other	7.0%

Putnam	Bayh	29.4%
	Young	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Randolph	Bayh	31.5%
	Young	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Ripley	Bayh	24.7%
	Young	71.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Rush	Bayh	31.3%
	Young	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

St. Joseph	Bayh	51.2%
	Young	42.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Scott	Bayh	41.4%
	Young	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Shelby	Bayh	30.9%
	Young	62.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Spencer	Bayh	40.1%
	Young	55.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Starke	Bayh	38.1%
	Young	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	7.7%

Steuben	Bayh	31.0%
	Young	62.0%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

Sullivan	Bayh	45.6%
	Young	49.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Switzerland	Bayh	34.1%
	Young	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Tippecanoe	Bayh	45.9%
	Young	47.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

Tipton	Bayh	30.1%
	Young	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Union	Bayh	27.4%
	Young	68.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Vanderburgh	Bayh	44.1%
	Young	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Vermillion	Bayh	46.3%
	Young	47.1%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Vigo	Bayh	52.8%
	Young	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Wabash	Bayh	29.4%
	Young	64.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Warren	Bayh	29.3%
	Young	65.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Warrick	Bayh	37.4%
	Young	58.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Washington	Bayh	33.2%
	Young	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Wayne	Bayh	36.2%
	Young	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Wells	Bayh	26.7%
	Young	66.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

White	Bayh	32.3%
	Young	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

Whitley	Bayh	28.9%
	Young	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	7.8%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Indiana Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved