2016 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Indiana
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdamsBayh29.2%
 
Young64.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.6%
 


AllenBayh40.5%
 
Young53.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.8%
 


BartholomewBayh35.2%
 
Young59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.7%
 


BentonBayh30.6%
 
Young62.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.7%
 


BlackfordBayh35.4%
 
Young57.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.6%
 


BooneBayh32.8%
 
Young61.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.3%
 


BrownBayh36.4%
 
Young57.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.8%
 


CarrollBayh29.0%
 
Young63.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.5%
 


CassBayh34.6%
 
Young58.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.1%
 


ClarkBayh41.9%
 
Young54.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.9%
 


ClayBayh35.8%
 
Young57.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.3%
 


ClintonBayh31.5%
 
Young62.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.3%
 


CrawfordBayh41.5%
 
Young54.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.7%
 


DaviessBayh29.3%
 
Young66.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.2%
 


DearbornBayh22.4%
 
Young73.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.1%
 


DecaturBayh27.7%
 
Young66.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.5%
 


DeKalbBayh30.2%
 
Young61.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other8.5%
 


DelawareBayh45.8%
 
Young48.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.1%
 


DuboisBayh39.1%
 
Young56.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.9%
 


ElkhartBayh35.4%
 
Young59.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.1%
 


FayetteBayh33.8%
 
Young59.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.5%
 


FloydBayh41.2%
 
Young55.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


FountainBayh27.6%
 
Young66.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.0%
 


FranklinBayh24.1%
 
Young72.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


FultonBayh33.2%
 
Young60.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.6%
 


GibsonBayh35.6%
 
Young59.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.0%
 


GrantBayh33.0%
 
Young60.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.5%
 


GreeneBayh37.1%
 
Young57.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.1%
 


HamiltonBayh35.9%
 
Young59.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


HancockBayh29.6%
 
Young63.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.6%
 


HarrisonBayh35.4%
 
Young61.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


HendricksBayh32.6%
 
Young62.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.2%
 


HenryBayh34.3%
 
Young57.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.7%
 


HowardBayh38.6%
 
Young55.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.5%
 


HuntingtonBayh28.8%
 
Young63.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other8.1%
 


JacksonBayh31.9%
 
Young64.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.1%
 


JasperBayh31.0%
 
Young64.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


JayBayh34.7%
 
Young57.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.6%
 


JeffersonBayh40.4%
 
Young56.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.4%
 


JenningsBayh33.2%
 
Young62.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.6%
 


JohnsonBayh29.7%
 
Young64.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.6%
 


KnoxBayh43.0%
 
Young51.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.4%
 


KosciuskoBayh24.9%
 
Young68.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.2%
 


LaGrangeBayh28.9%
 
Young64.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.4%
 


LakeBayh61.9%
 
Young34.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


LaPorteBayh49.9%
 
Young43.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.2%
 


LawrenceBayh29.2%
 
Young65.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.3%
 


MadisonBayh41.1%
 
Young52.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.8%
 


MarionBayh58.5%
 
Young36.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.5%
 


MarshallBayh34.7%
 
Young59.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.9%
 


MartinBayh33.3%
 
Young61.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.4%
 


MiamiBayh28.9%
 
Young63.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.6%
 


MonroeBayh58.3%
 
Young35.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.9%
 


MontgomeryBayh28.9%
 
Young64.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.4%
 


MorganBayh25.2%
 
Young68.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.5%
 


NewtonBayh31.0%
 
Young63.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.4%
 


NobleBayh29.9%
 
Young62.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.3%
 


OhioBayh29.5%
 
Young67.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


OrangeBayh34.0%
 
Young62.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


OwenBayh31.0%
 
Young62.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.5%
 


ParkeBayh35.3%
 
Young58.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.6%
 


PerryBayh49.9%
 
Young45.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.9%
 


PikeBayh37.5%
 
Young57.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.3%
 


PorterBayh48.0%
 
Young46.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.6%
 


PoseyBayh38.8%
 
Young56.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.8%
 


PulaskiBayh34.8%
 
Young58.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.0%
 


PutnamBayh29.4%
 
Young64.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.9%
 


RandolphBayh31.5%
 
Young62.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.0%
 


RipleyBayh24.7%
 
Young71.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


RushBayh31.3%
 
Young62.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.2%
 


St. JosephBayh51.2%
 
Young42.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.1%
 


ScottBayh41.4%
 
Young55.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


ShelbyBayh30.9%
 
Young62.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.2%
 


SpencerBayh40.1%
 
Young55.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.6%
 


StarkeBayh38.1%
 
Young54.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.7%
 


SteubenBayh31.0%
 
Young62.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.9%
 


SullivanBayh45.6%
 
Young49.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.1%
 


SwitzerlandBayh34.1%
 
Young62.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


TippecanoeBayh45.9%
 
Young47.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.4%
 


TiptonBayh30.1%
 
Young63.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.6%
 


UnionBayh27.4%
 
Young68.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.1%
 


VanderburghBayh44.1%
 
Young50.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.2%
 


VermillionBayh46.3%
 
Young47.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.6%
 


VigoBayh52.8%
 
Young41.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.6%
 


WabashBayh29.4%
 
Young64.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.3%
 


WarrenBayh29.3%
 
Young65.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.3%
 


WarrickBayh37.4%
 
Young58.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


WashingtonBayh33.2%
 
Young63.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


WayneBayh36.2%
 
Young57.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.5%
 


WellsBayh26.7%
 
Young66.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.4%
 


WhiteBayh32.3%
 
Young60.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.9%
 


WhitleyBayh28.9%
 
Young63.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other7.8%
 



National DataGraph for 2016 - Indiana Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Service - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© David Leip 2019 All Rights Reserved