Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

2016 Presidential Democratic Primary Election Data Graphs - North Carolina

by County

Map

Map

Alamance	Clinton	53.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.8%
	Other	4.4%

Alexander	Clinton	45.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.7%
	Other	9.5%

Alleghany	Clinton	44.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.9%
	Other	10.9%

Anson	Clinton	65.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.3%
	Other	7.8%

Ashe	Clinton	46.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.9%
	Other	7.6%

Avery	Clinton	41.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.2%
	Other	4.7%

Beaufort	Clinton	56.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.2%
	Other	9.4%

Bertie	Clinton	69.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.6%
	Other	5.1%

Bladen	Clinton	59.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.3%
	Other	14.1%

Brunswick	Clinton	60.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.6%
	Other	4.3%

Buncombe	Clinton	35.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	62.2%
	Other	2.5%

Burke	Clinton	46.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.4%
	Other	8.5%

Cabarrus	Clinton	51.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.6%
	Other	4.0%

Caldwell	Clinton	47.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.9%
	Other	7.1%

Camden	Clinton	54.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.5%
	Other	11.3%

Carteret	Clinton	48.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.5%
	Other	7.2%

Caswell	Clinton	60.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.9%
	Other	9.0%

Catawba	Clinton	51.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.1%
	Other	4.7%

Chatham	Clinton	54.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.0%
	Other	4.1%

Cherokee	Clinton	43.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.8%
	Other	12.4%

Chowan	Clinton	61.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.8%
	Other	8.3%

Clay	Clinton	52.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.0%
	Other	8.6%

Cleveland	Clinton	55.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.6%
	Other	8.5%

Columbus	Clinton	56.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.0%
	Other	12.5%

Craven	Clinton	58.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.7%
	Other	6.1%

Cumberland	Clinton	63.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.2%
	Other	5.1%

Currituck	Clinton	47.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.2%
	Other	8.9%

Dare	Clinton	42.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.1%
	Other	8.5%

Davidson	Clinton	50.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.3%
	Other	6.2%

Davie	Clinton	54.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.5%
	Other	5.5%

Duplin	Clinton	61.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.2%
	Other	9.5%

Durham	Clinton	57.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.1%
	Other	1.4%

Edgecombe	Clinton	70.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.7%
	Other	6.4%

Forsyth	Clinton	58.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.7%
	Other	2.1%

Franklin	Clinton	59.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.4%
	Other	6.3%

Gaston	Clinton	53.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.4%
	Other	5.6%

Gates	Clinton	61.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	9.1%

Graham	Clinton	44.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.8%
	Other	15.1%

Granville	Clinton	58.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.0%
	Other	7.2%

Greene	Clinton	59.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	11.8%

Guilford	Clinton	56.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.8%
	Other	2.2%

Halifax	Clinton	67.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.6%
	Other	8.4%

Harnett	Clinton	55.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.0%
	Other	8.0%

Haywood	Clinton	44.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.0%
	Other	9.4%

Henderson	Clinton	47.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.0%
	Other	2.9%

Hertford	Clinton	67.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.1%
	Other	10.3%

Hoke	Clinton	59.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.0%
	Other	9.1%

Hyde	Clinton	47.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.2%
	Other	12.2%

Iredell	Clinton	50.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.3%
	Other	5.8%

Jackson	Clinton	38.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.8%
	Other	4.9%

Johnston	Clinton	52.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.6%
	Other	7.4%

Jones	Clinton	58.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.0%
	Other	10.0%

Lee	Clinton	54.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.1%
	Other	7.3%

Lenoir	Clinton	64.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.2%
	Other	9.5%

Lincoln	Clinton	51.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.8%
	Other	6.9%

M'owell	Clinton	40.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.1%
	Other	10.1%

Macon	Clinton	47.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.3%
	Other	8.0%

Madison	Clinton	34.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	58.6%
	Other	6.8%

Martin	Clinton	61.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.4%
	Other	10.7%

Mecklenburg	Clinton	60.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.4%
	Other	1.4%

Mitchell	Clinton	40.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	57.8%
	Other	1.8%

Montgomery	Clinton	55.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.5%
	Other	9.6%

Moore	Clinton	58.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.1%
	Other	4.2%

Nash	Clinton	65.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.3%
	Other	5.9%

New Hanover	Clinton	48.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.7%
	Other	3.0%

Northampton	Clinton	68.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.8%
	Other	8.7%

Onslow	Clinton	54.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.3%
	Other	7.6%

Orange	Clinton	48.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.0%
	Other	1.6%

Pamlico	Clinton	53.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.9%
	Other	8.0%

Pasquotank	Clinton	65.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.0%
	Other	4.9%

Pender	Clinton	56.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.0%
	Other	6.7%

Perquimans	Clinton	51.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.7%
	Other	13.6%

Person	Clinton	51.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.2%
	Other	11.8%

Pitt	Clinton	56.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.9%
	Other	6.6%

Polk	Clinton	47.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.8%
	Other	3.5%

Randolph	Clinton	46.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.7%
	Other	7.6%

Richmond	Clinton	57.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.9%
	Other	11.8%

Robeson	Clinton	51.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.5%
	Other	17.5%

Rockingham	Clinton	54.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.7%
	Other	9.1%

Rowan	Clinton	52.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.7%
	Other	5.7%

Rutherford	Clinton	45.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.6%
	Other	9.5%

Sampson	Clinton	65.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.0%
	Other	7.4%

Scotland	Clinton	63.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.9%
	Other	10.1%

Stanly	Clinton	49.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.3%
	Other	9.4%

Stokes	Clinton	47.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.1%
	Other	8.1%

Surry	Clinton	47.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.8%
	Other	8.6%

Swain	Clinton	41.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.3%
	Other	7.8%

Transylvania	Clinton	45.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.8%
	Other	4.4%

Tyrrell	Clinton	49.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.5%
	Other	14.2%

Union	Clinton	55.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.6%
	Other	3.7%

Vance	Clinton	63.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.1%
	Other	8.0%

Wake	Clinton	53.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.1%
	Other	1.8%

Warren	Clinton	70.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.1%
	Other	5.8%

Washington	Clinton	62.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.0%
	Other	11.0%

Watauga	Clinton	29.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	69.1%
	Other	1.8%

Wayne	Clinton	62.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.7%
	Other	7.9%

Wilkes	Clinton	50.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	42.6%
	Other	7.0%

Wilson	Clinton	64.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.4%
	Other	6.4%

Yadkin	Clinton	47.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.4%
	Other	6.8%

Yancey	Clinton	40.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.4%
	Other	10.0%

National DataGraph for 2016 - North Carolina Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved

Note: The advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.