2016 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - North Dakota
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdamsGlassheim9.3%
 
Hoeven87.2%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other2.0%
 


BarnesGlassheim15.6%
 
Hoeven80.6%
 
Germalic1.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


BensonGlassheim28.4%
 
Hoeven66.3%
 
Germalic1.9%
 
Other3.5%
 


BillingsGlassheim7.1%
 
Hoeven89.8%
 
Germalic0.5%
 
Other2.6%
 


BottineauGlassheim10.9%
 
Hoeven85.7%
 
Germalic1.1%
 
Other2.3%
 


BowmanGlassheim7.6%
 
Hoeven89.5%
 
Germalic0.8%
 
Other2.1%
 


BurkeGlassheim6.3%
 
Hoeven91.9%
 
Germalic0.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


BurleighGlassheim14.4%
 
Hoeven81.2%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other3.0%
 


CassGlassheim22.9%
 
Hoeven71.6%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other4.2%
 


CavalierGlassheim14.2%
 
Hoeven83.3%
 
Germalic0.9%
 
Other1.6%
 


DickeyGlassheim13.8%
 
Hoeven83.2%
 
Germalic1.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


DivideGlassheim11.4%
 
Hoeven84.5%
 
Germalic1.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


DunnGlassheim11.2%
 
Hoeven85.5%
 
Germalic1.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


EddyGlassheim17.9%
 
Hoeven78.5%
 
Germalic0.8%
 
Other2.9%
 


EmmonsGlassheim6.9%
 
Hoeven89.7%
 
Germalic1.5%
 
Other2.0%
 


FosterGlassheim9.8%
 
Hoeven85.5%
 
Germalic1.2%
 
Other3.5%
 


Golden ValleyGlassheim6.5%
 
Hoeven89.6%
 
Germalic0.8%
 
Other3.0%
 


Grand ForksGlassheim25.9%
 
Hoeven69.9%
 
Germalic1.3%
 
Other3.0%
 


GrantGlassheim7.7%
 
Hoeven89.0%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other2.0%
 


GriggsGlassheim15.1%
 
Hoeven81.7%
 
Germalic0.9%
 
Other2.3%
 


HettingerGlassheim6.8%
 
Hoeven89.5%
 
Germalic1.3%
 
Other2.4%
 


KidderGlassheim8.4%
 
Hoeven87.6%
 
Germalic0.9%
 
Other3.1%
 


LaMoureGlassheim13.4%
 
Hoeven83.3%
 
Germalic1.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


LoganGlassheim6.6%
 
Hoeven90.6%
 
Germalic0.9%
 
Other1.9%
 


McHenryGlassheim10.4%
 
Hoeven85.2%
 
Germalic1.7%
 
Other2.7%
 


McIntoshGlassheim7.5%
 
Hoeven90.1%
 
Germalic1.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


McKenzieGlassheim10.7%
 
Hoeven84.8%
 
Germalic1.3%
 
Other3.2%
 


McLeanGlassheim13.7%
 
Hoeven82.3%
 
Germalic1.7%
 
Other2.3%
 


MercerGlassheim10.0%
 
Hoeven86.4%
 
Germalic1.3%
 
Other2.2%
 


MortonGlassheim13.4%
 
Hoeven82.3%
 
Germalic1.5%
 
Other2.8%
 


MountrailGlassheim21.8%
 
Hoeven73.0%
 
Germalic2.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


NelsonGlassheim18.5%
 
Hoeven76.7%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other3.4%
 


OliverGlassheim7.2%
 
Hoeven89.3%
 
Germalic1.1%
 
Other2.4%
 


PembinaGlassheim14.2%
 
Hoeven83.0%
 
Germalic0.7%
 
Other2.1%
 


PierceGlassheim10.7%
 
Hoeven86.7%
 
Germalic1.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


RamseyGlassheim16.2%
 
Hoeven79.9%
 
Germalic1.3%
 
Other2.5%
 


RansomGlassheim19.6%
 
Hoeven75.7%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other3.3%
 


RenvilleGlassheim8.0%
 
Hoeven88.2%
 
Germalic1.5%
 
Other2.3%
 


RichlandGlassheim14.8%
 
Hoeven80.3%
 
Germalic1.3%
 
Other3.6%
 


RoletteGlassheim45.7%
 
Hoeven48.3%
 
Germalic2.3%
 
Other3.7%
 


SargentGlassheim20.9%
 
Hoeven74.8%
 
Germalic1.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


SheridanGlassheim7.6%
 
Hoeven88.8%
 
Germalic1.5%
 
Other2.1%
 


SiouxGlassheim53.1%
 
Hoeven35.7%
 
Germalic5.4%
 
Other5.8%
 


SlopeGlassheim5.8%
 
Hoeven90.7%
 
Germalic1.6%
 
Other1.9%
 


StarkGlassheim9.0%
 
Hoeven87.2%
 
Germalic1.1%
 
Other2.7%
 


SteeleGlassheim19.8%
 
Hoeven76.6%
 
Germalic0.7%
 
Other2.9%
 


StutsmanGlassheim13.2%
 
Hoeven83.2%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


TownerGlassheim15.2%
 
Hoeven80.9%
 
Germalic1.4%
 
Other2.5%
 


TraillGlassheim18.9%
 
Hoeven77.4%
 
Germalic1.1%
 
Other2.7%
 


WalshGlassheim15.9%
 
Hoeven80.5%
 
Germalic1.1%
 
Other2.6%
 


WardGlassheim12.2%
 
Hoeven82.8%
 
Germalic1.5%
 
Other3.5%
 


WellsGlassheim10.0%
 
Hoeven86.8%
 
Germalic1.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


WilliamsGlassheim9.4%
 
Hoeven85.3%
 
Germalic1.5%
 
Other3.8%
 



National DataGraph for 2016 - North Dakota Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Service - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved