2016 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Oklahoma
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdairWorkman24.0%
 
Lankford70.8%
 
Braddy1.7%
 
Other3.5%
 


AlfalfaWorkman7.5%
 
Lankford87.6%
 
Braddy1.1%
 
Other3.8%
 


AtokaWorkman24.1%
 
Lankford69.9%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other3.7%
 


BeaverWorkman7.6%
 
Lankford87.3%
 
Braddy1.2%
 
Other3.9%
 


BeckhamWorkman11.5%
 
Lankford83.6%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other3.0%
 


BlaineWorkman14.5%
 
Lankford80.1%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other3.5%
 


BryanWorkman21.8%
 
Lankford70.4%
 
Braddy2.9%
 
Other4.8%
 


CaddoWorkman21.1%
 
Lankford73.8%
 
Braddy1.8%
 
Other3.3%
 


CanadianWorkman16.3%
 
Lankford76.2%
 
Braddy2.4%
 
Other5.1%
 


CarterWorkman21.9%
 
Lankford70.4%
 
Braddy2.7%
 
Other5.0%
 


CherokeeWorkman32.0%
 
Lankford60.2%
 
Braddy2.4%
 
Other5.3%
 


ChoctawWorkman24.1%
 
Lankford69.5%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


CimarronWorkman7.2%
 
Lankford84.9%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other5.9%
 


ClevelandWorkman26.6%
 
Lankford61.9%
 
Braddy6.0%
 
Other5.6%
 


CoalWorkman26.6%
 
Lankford66.1%
 
Braddy2.6%
 
Other4.7%
 


ComancheWorkman29.8%
 
Lankford61.7%
 
Braddy3.2%
 
Other5.3%
 


CottonWorkman15.0%
 
Lankford78.1%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other4.9%
 


CraigWorkman21.4%
 
Lankford73.3%
 
Braddy1.5%
 
Other3.8%
 


CreekWorkman18.3%
 
Lankford75.2%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other4.5%
 


CusterWorkman15.4%
 
Lankford78.9%
 
Braddy1.8%
 
Other3.9%
 


DelawareWorkman21.2%
 
Lankford73.1%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other3.8%
 


DeweyWorkman8.3%
 
Lankford88.3%
 
Braddy1.3%
 
Other2.1%
 


EllisWorkman7.4%
 
Lankford88.4%
 
Braddy1.3%
 
Other3.0%
 


GarfieldWorkman15.7%
 
Lankford77.3%
 
Braddy2.5%
 
Other4.4%
 


GarvinWorkman16.0%
 
Lankford77.8%
 
Braddy2.2%
 
Other4.0%
 


GradyWorkman14.5%
 
Lankford79.4%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other4.1%
 


GrantWorkman9.4%
 
Lankford85.2%
 
Braddy1.5%
 
Other3.9%
 


GreerWorkman16.9%
 
Lankford78.0%
 
Braddy1.2%
 
Other3.9%
 


HarmonWorkman19.4%
 
Lankford76.8%
 
Braddy0.7%
 
Other3.0%
 


HarperWorkman6.4%
 
Lankford89.7%
 
Braddy1.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


HaskellWorkman23.4%
 
Lankford72.1%
 
Braddy1.7%
 
Other2.7%
 


HughesWorkman19.8%
 
Lankford75.1%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other3.3%
 


JacksonWorkman15.8%
 
Lankford78.2%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other4.1%
 


JeffersonWorkman18.9%
 
Lankford74.7%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other4.1%
 


JohnstonWorkman25.5%
 
Lankford67.3%
 
Braddy2.6%
 
Other4.6%
 


KayWorkman18.8%
 
Lankford73.6%
 
Braddy2.5%
 
Other5.0%
 


KingfisherWorkman8.6%
 
Lankford86.9%
 
Braddy1.6%
 
Other3.0%
 


KiowaWorkman18.2%
 
Lankford78.0%
 
Braddy1.6%
 
Other2.2%
 


LatimerWorkman24.2%
 
Lankford70.1%
 
Braddy2.1%
 
Other3.7%
 


Le FloreWorkman24.0%
 
Lankford68.8%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other4.9%
 


LincolnWorkman14.3%
 
Lankford79.7%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other4.1%
 


LoganWorkman17.5%
 
Lankford74.9%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other5.6%
 


LoveWorkman23.0%
 
Lankford69.9%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other4.8%
 


McClainWorkman14.2%
 
Lankford79.7%
 
Braddy2.1%
 
Other4.0%
 


McCurtainWorkman22.4%
 
Lankford70.7%
 
Braddy3.1%
 
Other3.8%
 


McIntoshWorkman27.4%
 
Lankford67.0%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


MajorWorkman6.6%
 
Lankford89.0%
 
Braddy1.4%
 
Other2.9%
 


MarshallWorkman22.1%
 
Lankford70.5%
 
Braddy2.4%
 
Other5.1%
 


MayesWorkman21.8%
 
Lankford72.3%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other4.0%
 


MurrayWorkman18.2%
 
Lankford75.7%
 
Braddy1.7%
 
Other4.4%
 


MuskogeeWorkman31.0%
 
Lankford62.9%
 
Braddy2.1%
 
Other4.0%
 


NobleWorkman15.7%
 
Lankford78.8%
 
Braddy1.5%
 
Other4.1%
 


NowataWorkman20.1%
 
Lankford74.0%
 
Braddy1.7%
 
Other4.3%
 


OkfuskeeWorkman23.1%
 
Lankford71.3%
 
Braddy1.7%
 
Other3.9%
 


OklahomaWorkman32.5%
 
Lankford58.5%
 
Braddy3.4%
 
Other5.6%
 


OkmulgeeWorkman29.3%
 
Lankford64.3%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other4.1%
 


OsageWorkman27.2%
 
Lankford66.0%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other4.4%
 


OttawaWorkman26.4%
 
Lankford65.9%
 
Braddy2.5%
 
Other5.1%
 


PawneeWorkman19.6%
 
Lankford73.6%
 
Braddy1.8%
 
Other5.0%
 


PayneWorkman24.9%
 
Lankford65.7%
 
Braddy2.9%
 
Other6.5%
 


PittsburgWorkman24.1%
 
Lankford69.4%
 
Braddy2.4%
 
Other4.1%
 


PontotocWorkman24.0%
 
Lankford68.9%
 
Braddy2.7%
 
Other4.4%
 


PottawatomieWorkman18.2%
 
Lankford75.2%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other4.3%
 


PushmatahaWorkman22.4%
 
Lankford70.5%
 
Braddy2.7%
 
Other4.4%
 


Roger MillsWorkman8.2%
 
Lankford88.0%
 
Braddy0.9%
 
Other2.9%
 


RogersWorkman16.8%
 
Lankford76.5%
 
Braddy2.1%
 
Other4.5%
 


SeminoleWorkman20.8%
 
Lankford73.3%
 
Braddy2.0%
 
Other4.0%
 


SequoyahWorkman25.8%
 
Lankford66.9%
 
Braddy2.7%
 
Other4.6%
 


StephensWorkman15.6%
 
Lankford79.1%
 
Braddy1.7%
 
Other3.6%
 


TexasWorkman13.4%
 
Lankford78.7%
 
Braddy2.3%
 
Other5.6%
 


TillmanWorkman21.6%
 
Lankford72.7%
 
Braddy2.1%
 
Other3.6%
 


TulsaWorkman29.4%
 
Lankford62.7%
 
Braddy2.6%
 
Other5.3%
 


WagonerWorkman19.4%
 
Lankford74.2%
 
Braddy1.9%
 
Other4.5%
 


WashingtonWorkman19.0%
 
Lankford74.1%
 
Braddy1.8%
 
Other5.0%
 


WashitaWorkman11.4%
 
Lankford84.2%
 
Braddy1.2%
 
Other3.2%
 


WoodsWorkman11.1%
 
Lankford83.4%
 
Braddy1.5%
 
Other4.0%
 


WoodwardWorkman10.0%
 
Lankford84.8%
 
Braddy1.4%
 
Other3.9%
 



National DataGraph for 2016 - Oklahoma Results for 2016

Login

© David Leip 2016 All Rights Reserved