2016 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - South Dakota
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AuroraWilliams24.2%
 
Thune75.8%
 
0.0%
 


BeadleWilliams26.4%
 
Thune73.6%
 
0.0%
 


BennettWilliams33.5%
 
Thune66.5%
 
0.0%
 


Bon HommeWilliams25.5%
 
Thune74.5%
 
0.0%
 


BrookingsWilliams30.9%
 
Thune69.1%
 
0.0%
 


BrownWilliams29.7%
 
Thune70.3%
 
0.0%
 


BruleWilliams24.1%
 
Thune75.9%
 
0.0%
 


BuffaloWilliams52.6%
 
Thune47.4%
 
0.0%
 


ButteWilliams17.6%
 
Thune82.4%
 
0.0%
 


CampbellWilliams10.5%
 
Thune89.5%
 
0.0%
 


Charles MixWilliams27.5%
 
Thune72.5%
 
0.0%
 


ClarkWilliams24.3%
 
Thune75.7%
 
0.0%
 


ClayWilliams42.5%
 
Thune57.5%
 
0.0%
 


CodingtonWilliams25.6%
 
Thune74.4%
 
0.0%
 


CorsonWilliams41.1%
 
Thune58.9%
 
0.0%
 


CusterWilliams25.0%
 
Thune75.0%
 
0.0%
 


DavisonWilliams24.9%
 
Thune75.1%
 
0.0%
 


DayWilliams34.6%
 
Thune65.4%
 
0.0%
 


DeuelWilliams25.5%
 
Thune74.5%
 
0.0%
 


DeweyWilliams49.1%
 
Thune50.9%
 
0.0%
 


DouglasWilliams14.2%
 
Thune85.8%
 
0.0%
 


EdmundsWilliams20.7%
 
Thune79.3%
 
0.0%
 


Fall RiverWilliams24.5%
 
Thune75.5%
 
0.0%
 


FaulkWilliams18.2%
 
Thune81.8%
 
0.0%
 


GrantWilliams24.8%
 
Thune75.2%
 
0.0%
 


GregoryWilliams20.3%
 
Thune79.7%
 
0.0%
 


HaakonWilliams8.1%
 
Thune91.9%
 
0.0%
 


HamlinWilliams19.2%
 
Thune80.8%
 
0.0%
 


HandWilliams18.1%
 
Thune81.9%
 
0.0%
 


HansonWilliams23.0%
 
Thune77.0%
 
0.0%
 


HardingWilliams9.8%
 
Thune90.2%
 
0.0%
 


HughesWilliams23.0%
 
Thune77.0%
 
0.0%
 


HutchinsonWilliams18.0%
 
Thune82.0%
 
0.0%
 


HydeWilliams17.9%
 
Thune82.1%
 
0.0%
 


JacksonWilliams28.6%
 
Thune71.4%
 
0.0%
 


JerauldWilliams26.6%
 
Thune73.4%
 
0.0%
 


JonesWilliams11.9%
 
Thune88.1%
 
0.0%
 


KingsburyWilliams26.2%
 
Thune73.8%
 
0.0%
 


LakeWilliams30.3%
 
Thune69.7%
 
0.0%
 


LawrenceWilliams27.6%
 
Thune72.4%
 
0.0%
 


LincolnWilliams23.9%
 
Thune76.1%
 
0.0%
 


LymanWilliams26.5%
 
Thune73.5%
 
0.0%
 


McCookWilliams22.9%
 
Thune77.1%
 
0.0%
 


McPhersonWilliams14.1%
 
Thune85.9%
 
0.0%
 


MarshallWilliams31.9%
 
Thune68.1%
 
0.0%
 


MeadeWilliams20.3%
 
Thune79.7%
 
0.0%
 


MelletteWilliams32.6%
 
Thune67.4%
 
0.0%
 


MinerWilliams26.0%
 
Thune74.0%
 
0.0%
 


MinnehahaWilliams32.6%
 
Thune67.4%
 
0.0%
 


MoodyWilliams32.8%
 
Thune67.2%
 
0.0%
 


PenningtonWilliams28.0%
 
Thune72.0%
 
0.0%
 


PerkinsWilliams14.4%
 
Thune85.6%
 
0.0%
 


PotterWilliams18.9%
 
Thune81.1%
 
0.0%
 


RobertsWilliams35.0%
 
Thune65.0%
 
0.0%
 


SanbornWilliams21.5%
 
Thune78.5%
 
0.0%
 


Oglala LakotaWilliams77.2%
 
Thune22.8%
 
0.0%
 


SpinkWilliams27.3%
 
Thune72.7%
 
0.0%
 


StanleyWilliams19.5%
 
Thune80.5%
 
0.0%
 


SullyWilliams15.9%
 
Thune84.1%
 
0.0%
 


ToddWilliams65.5%
 
Thune34.5%
 
0.0%
 


TrippWilliams18.7%
 
Thune81.3%
 
0.0%
 


TurnerWilliams20.9%
 
Thune79.1%
 
0.0%
 


UnionWilliams22.8%
 
Thune77.2%
 
0.0%
 


WalworthWilliams19.6%
 
Thune80.4%
 
0.0%
 


YanktonWilliams32.1%
 
Thune67.9%
 
0.0%
 


ZiebachWilliams45.0%
 
Thune55.0%
 
0.0%
 



National DataGraph for 2016 - South Dakota Results for 2016

Login

© David Leip 2016 All Rights Reserved