Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alcona	Stabenow	34.5%
	James	63.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Alger	Stabenow	45.9%
	James	51.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Allegan	Stabenow	38.0%
	James	60.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Alpena	Stabenow	41.4%
	James	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Antrim	Stabenow	38.5%
	James	59.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Arenac	Stabenow	38.3%
	James	59.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Baraga	Stabenow	41.4%
	James	56.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Barry	Stabenow	36.9%
	James	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Bay	Stabenow	48.6%
	James	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Benzie	Stabenow	45.9%
	James	52.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Berrien	Stabenow	44.1%
	James	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Branch	Stabenow	33.8%
	James	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Calhoun	Stabenow	45.4%
	James	51.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Cass	Stabenow	36.4%
	James	60.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Charlevoix	Stabenow	41.0%
	James	57.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Cheboygan	Stabenow	38.5%
	James	59.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Chippewa	Stabenow	42.2%
	James	55.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Clare	Stabenow	38.1%
	James	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Clinton	Stabenow	47.4%
	James	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Crawford	Stabenow	36.9%
	James	60.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Delta	Stabenow	42.2%
	James	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Dickinson	Stabenow	36.6%
	James	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Eaton	Stabenow	51.3%
	James	46.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Emmet	Stabenow	42.6%
	James	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Genesee	Stabenow	57.0%
	James	40.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Gladwin	Stabenow	37.8%
	James	60.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Gogebic	Stabenow	50.7%
	James	47.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Grand Traverse	Stabenow	46.7%
	James	51.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Gratiot	Stabenow	40.3%
	James	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Hillsdale	Stabenow	30.2%
	James	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Houghton	Stabenow	45.6%
	James	52.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Huron	Stabenow	37.2%
	James	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Ingham	Stabenow	65.5%
	James	32.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Ionia	Stabenow	39.0%
	James	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Iosco	Stabenow	40.6%
	James	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Iron	Stabenow	41.8%
	James	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Isabella	Stabenow	50.4%
	James	47.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Jackson	Stabenow	42.5%
	James	55.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Kalamazoo	Stabenow	57.3%
	James	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Kalkaska	Stabenow	32.9%
	James	64.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Kent	Stabenow	49.1%
	James	48.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Keweenaw	Stabenow	45.2%
	James	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Lake	Stabenow	41.1%
	James	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Lapeer	Stabenow	36.5%
	James	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Leelanau	Stabenow	50.8%
	James	47.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lenawee	Stabenow	42.8%
	James	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Livingston	Stabenow	38.6%
	James	59.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Luce	Stabenow	33.8%
	James	63.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Mackinac	Stabenow	40.7%
	James	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Macomb	Stabenow	50.1%
	James	48.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Manistee	Stabenow	44.8%
	James	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Marquette	Stabenow	56.6%
	James	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Mason	Stabenow	41.7%
	James	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Mecosta	Stabenow	40.5%
	James	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Menominee	Stabenow	41.5%
	James	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Midland	Stabenow	41.6%
	James	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Missaukee	Stabenow	27.2%
	James	70.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Monroe	Stabenow	43.4%
	James	54.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Montcalm	Stabenow	37.6%
	James	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Montmorency	Stabenow	33.3%
	James	64.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Muskegon	Stabenow	52.3%
	James	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Newaygo	Stabenow	33.9%
	James	63.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Oakland	Stabenow	56.1%
	James	42.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Oceana	Stabenow	39.2%
	James	58.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Ogemaw	Stabenow	36.0%
	James	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Ontonagon	Stabenow	42.0%
	James	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Osceola	Stabenow	31.2%
	James	65.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Oscoda	Stabenow	32.8%
	James	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Otsego	Stabenow	35.0%
	James	62.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Ottawa	Stabenow	35.6%
	James	62.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Presque Isle	Stabenow	41.3%
	James	56.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Roscommon	Stabenow	39.3%
	James	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Saginaw	Stabenow	51.3%
	James	46.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

St. Clair	Stabenow	40.8%
	James	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

St. Joseph	Stabenow	35.7%
	James	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Sanilac	Stabenow	33.0%
	James	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Schoolcraft	Stabenow	41.4%
	James	56.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Shiawassee	Stabenow	43.9%
	James	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Tuscola	Stabenow	36.8%
	James	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Van Buren	Stabenow	44.8%
	James	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Washtenaw	Stabenow	71.2%
	James	27.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Wayne	Stabenow	69.1%
	James	29.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Wexford	Stabenow	34.6%
	James	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

National DataGraph for 2018 - Michigan Results for 2018

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved