Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Broyles	22.8%
	Inhofe	72.6%
	Farr	1.8%
	Other	2.8%

Alfalfa	Broyles	11.6%
	Inhofe	84.1%
	Farr	1.7%
	Other	2.6%

Atoka	Broyles	14.9%
	Inhofe	81.9%
	Farr	1.0%
	Other	2.1%

Beaver	Broyles	9.0%
	Inhofe	87.3%
	Farr	1.0%
	Other	2.7%

Beckham	Broyles	15.1%
	Inhofe	81.0%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.8%

Blaine	Broyles	19.3%
	Inhofe	76.9%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	2.3%

Bryan	Broyles	21.0%
	Inhofe	75.0%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	2.9%

Caddo	Broyles	27.1%
	Inhofe	68.7%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	2.7%

Canadian	Broyles	28.2%
	Inhofe	67.3%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	3.2%

Carter	Broyles	22.4%
	Inhofe	73.8%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.5%

Cherokee	Broyles	36.9%
	Inhofe	58.0%
	Farr	1.7%
	Other	3.4%

Choctaw	Broyles	18.4%
	Inhofe	78.5%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	1.9%

Cimarron	Broyles	6.1%
	Inhofe	90.9%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	1.9%

Cleveland	Broyles	41.5%
	Inhofe	54.0%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	3.1%

Coal	Broyles	17.3%
	Inhofe	79.2%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	2.3%

Comanche	Broyles	35.8%
	Inhofe	59.2%
	Farr	1.7%
	Other	3.3%

Cotton	Broyles	14.0%
	Inhofe	82.5%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.2%

Craig	Broyles	24.1%
	Inhofe	71.2%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	3.1%

Creek	Broyles	22.9%
	Inhofe	72.6%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	2.9%

Custer	Broyles	23.0%
	Inhofe	72.5%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	3.2%

Delaware	Broyles	21.5%
	Inhofe	74.7%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.3%

Dewey	Broyles	10.7%
	Inhofe	86.9%
	Farr	0.8%
	Other	1.5%

Ellis	Broyles	10.0%
	Inhofe	86.9%
	Farr	1.0%
	Other	2.1%

Garfield	Broyles	22.4%
	Inhofe	73.0%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	3.2%

Garvin	Broyles	18.3%
	Inhofe	78.1%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.3%

Grady	Broyles	19.5%
	Inhofe	76.8%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	2.4%

Grant	Broyles	13.7%
	Inhofe	82.8%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.3%

Greer	Broyles	17.7%
	Inhofe	78.3%
	Farr	1.0%
	Other	3.0%

Harmon	Broyles	19.5%
	Inhofe	78.2%
	Farr	0.6%
	Other	1.6%

Harper	Broyles	9.7%
	Inhofe	87.0%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	1.8%

Haskell	Broyles	18.6%
	Inhofe	78.2%
	Farr	1.0%
	Other	2.2%

Hughes	Broyles	20.8%
	Inhofe	75.8%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.1%

Jackson	Broyles	17.7%
	Inhofe	78.2%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	2.9%

Jefferson	Broyles	13.7%
	Inhofe	82.4%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.6%

Johnston	Broyles	17.8%
	Inhofe	78.7%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.2%

Kay	Broyles	24.2%
	Inhofe	71.1%
	Farr	1.7%
	Other	3.1%

Kingfisher	Broyles	13.9%
	Inhofe	82.6%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.4%

Kiowa	Broyles	21.3%
	Inhofe	75.8%
	Farr	0.7%
	Other	2.2%

Latimer	Broyles	20.9%
	Inhofe	75.2%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.5%

Le Flore	Broyles	18.6%
	Inhofe	77.7%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.3%

Lincoln	Broyles	18.7%
	Inhofe	77.2%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.8%

Logan	Broyles	25.8%
	Inhofe	70.0%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	3.1%

Love	Broyles	17.3%
	Inhofe	79.6%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.1%

McClain	Broyles	20.1%
	Inhofe	76.1%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.7%

McCurtain	Broyles	17.1%
	Inhofe	79.6%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	2.1%

McIntosh	Broyles	27.0%
	Inhofe	69.2%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.5%

Major	Broyles	10.1%
	Inhofe	86.4%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.4%

Marshall	Broyles	18.0%
	Inhofe	78.9%
	Farr	1.0%
	Other	2.1%

Mayes	Broyles	24.0%
	Inhofe	71.4%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	2.9%

Murray	Broyles	21.3%
	Inhofe	74.9%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.5%

Muskogee	Broyles	33.5%
	Inhofe	62.1%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	2.9%

Noble	Broyles	22.3%
	Inhofe	73.0%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	3.3%

Nowata	Broyles	18.6%
	Inhofe	77.0%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	2.8%

Okfuskee	Broyles	24.7%
	Inhofe	71.3%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	2.4%

Oklahoma	Broyles	47.4%
	Inhofe	48.3%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	3.0%

Okmulgee	Broyles	31.6%
	Inhofe	63.9%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	2.9%

Osage	Broyles	30.9%
	Inhofe	64.8%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	2.8%

Ottawa	Broyles	29.0%
	Inhofe	64.3%
	Farr	2.4%
	Other	4.4%

Pawnee	Broyles	21.6%
	Inhofe	73.1%
	Farr	2.0%
	Other	3.4%

Payne	Broyles	37.2%
	Inhofe	57.8%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	3.7%

Pittsburg	Broyles	22.6%
	Inhofe	73.3%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	2.6%

Pontotoc	Broyles	27.3%
	Inhofe	68.3%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	3.1%

Pottawatomie	Broyles	27.2%
	Inhofe	68.5%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	3.0%

Pushmataha	Broyles	15.2%
	Inhofe	81.4%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.3%

Roger Mills	Broyles	12.8%
	Inhofe	84.0%
	Farr	0.8%
	Other	2.3%

Rogers	Broyles	23.0%
	Inhofe	72.2%
	Farr	1.6%
	Other	3.2%

Seminole	Broyles	27.6%
	Inhofe	68.8%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	2.4%

Sequoyah	Broyles	21.8%
	Inhofe	74.5%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.5%

Stephens	Broyles	16.5%
	Inhofe	80.2%
	Farr	1.1%
	Other	2.3%

Texas	Broyles	15.5%
	Inhofe	79.3%
	Farr	1.8%
	Other	3.4%

Tillman	Broyles	20.0%
	Inhofe	76.9%
	Farr	1.2%
	Other	1.9%

Tulsa	Broyles	40.9%
	Inhofe	54.6%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	3.1%

Wagoner	Broyles	25.1%
	Inhofe	70.5%
	Farr	1.5%
	Other	2.9%

Washington	Broyles	25.2%
	Inhofe	70.0%
	Farr	1.7%
	Other	3.1%

Washita	Broyles	14.7%
	Inhofe	81.5%
	Farr	1.3%
	Other	2.6%

Woods	Broyles	18.2%
	Inhofe	77.6%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	2.8%

Woodward	Broyles	14.2%
	Inhofe	81.4%
	Farr	1.4%
	Other	3.0%

National DataGraph for 2020 - Oklahoma Results for 2020

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved