Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Aurora	Smith	23.4%
	Noem	73.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Beadle	Smith	29.4%
	Noem	66.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Bennett	Smith	35.9%
	Noem	60.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Bon Homme	Smith	25.4%
	Noem	72.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Brookings	Smith	41.0%
	Noem	56.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Brown	Smith	37.0%
	Noem	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Brule	Smith	27.9%
	Noem	69.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Buffalo	Smith	58.9%
	Noem	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Butte	Smith	19.7%
	Noem	76.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Campbell	Smith	13.9%
	Noem	84.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Charles Mix	Smith	27.5%
	Noem	70.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Clark	Smith	21.3%
	Noem	76.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Clay	Smith	54.4%
	Noem	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Codington	Smith	29.4%
	Noem	67.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Corson	Smith	40.8%
	Noem	56.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Custer	Smith	25.5%
	Noem	71.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Davison	Smith	30.1%
	Noem	67.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Day	Smith	34.7%
	Noem	63.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Deuel	Smith	23.0%
	Noem	74.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Dewey	Smith	54.8%
	Noem	42.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Douglas	Smith	12.7%
	Noem	85.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Edmunds	Smith	20.3%
	Noem	77.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Fall River	Smith	23.4%
	Noem	73.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Faulk	Smith	17.5%
	Noem	80.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Grant	Smith	25.8%
	Noem	72.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Gregory	Smith	19.1%
	Noem	78.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Haakon	Smith	8.3%
	Noem	90.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Hamlin	Smith	20.1%
	Noem	77.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Hand	Smith	19.3%
	Noem	78.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Hanson	Smith	20.6%
	Noem	77.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Harding	Smith	4.9%
	Noem	93.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Hughes	Smith	35.6%
	Noem	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Hutchinson	Smith	19.0%
	Noem	79.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Hyde	Smith	18.4%
	Noem	80.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Jackson	Smith	30.5%
	Noem	67.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Jerauld	Smith	27.5%
	Noem	69.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Jones	Smith	13.6%
	Noem	83.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Kingsbury	Smith	27.1%
	Noem	70.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Lake	Smith	34.6%
	Noem	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Lawrence	Smith	33.0%
	Noem	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Lincoln	Smith	38.1%
	Noem	59.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Lyman	Smith	30.7%
	Noem	66.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

McCook	Smith	24.5%
	Noem	72.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

McPherson	Smith	15.2%
	Noem	82.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Marshall	Smith	39.0%
	Noem	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Meade	Smith	24.3%
	Noem	71.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Mellette	Smith	34.0%
	Noem	61.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Miner	Smith	24.6%
	Noem	72.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Minnehaha	Smith	44.7%
	Noem	52.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Moody	Smith	34.4%
	Noem	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Pennington	Smith	35.7%
	Noem	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Perkins	Smith	12.9%
	Noem	83.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Potter	Smith	17.0%
	Noem	81.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Roberts	Smith	36.9%
	Noem	60.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Sanborn	Smith	22.5%
	Noem	75.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Oglala Lakota	Smith	87.6%
	Noem	8.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Spink	Smith	28.7%
	Noem	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Stanley	Smith	28.1%
	Noem	69.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Sully	Smith	21.4%
	Noem	75.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Todd	Smith	75.0%
	Noem	20.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Tripp	Smith	16.0%
	Noem	82.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Turner	Smith	23.8%
	Noem	73.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Union	Smith	27.4%
	Noem	70.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Walworth	Smith	20.9%
	Noem	76.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Yankton	Smith	37.6%
	Noem	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Ziebach	Smith	44.5%
	Noem	50.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

National DataGraph for 2022 - South Dakota Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved