Hillary Clinton: Joining A Gang Is Like Having A Family (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 05:13:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Hillary Clinton: Joining A Gang Is Like Having A Family (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary Clinton: Joining A Gang Is Like Having A Family  (Read 2814 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,483


« on: July 18, 2016, 02:32:32 PM »

Stupendous backfire on your thread, Seriously?.
I expect nothing less from a bunch of kool-aid drinking leftists. But there should be some counter to the 1,000 Donald Trump is Satan posts I see daily on here.

So, what do you see is wrong with what she said?
Family has a positive connotation. Gangs do not.

They do for the people who join them, at the time that they join them. This is universally accepted in sociology of deviancy, and is obviously what Clinton was saying.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,483


« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2016, 04:19:06 PM »

She isn't wrong, but would she say that what leads to gangs is the breakdown of the family? Nope. People don't need strong families they need government.

Hillary Clinton would be one of the first Democrats to say that, actually. Not that the Democratic Party as a whole is known for giving a sh**t, admittedly.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,483


« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2016, 04:32:01 PM »
« Edited: July 18, 2016, 04:33:47 PM by Jet fuel can't melt dank memes »

I forgot to mention:

How do you feel about Trump's overwhelming support from KKK members, and Neo-Nazis?
By that logic, I am sure Hillary! takes the gang-banger vote. And your point?

See, 'gang-bangers' are objectionable for primarily apolitical reasons, so winning their vote isn't worrying on a political level. (Same with winning the vote of Hell's Angels, or adulterers, or those guys who hock up phlegm on purpose.) I don't understand how this distinction isn't obvious.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,483


« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2016, 04:57:49 PM »

What I mean is that, when you think 'gang-bangers', you don't think 'these people are awful because of their politics', which you do think with the KKK and Neo-Nazis.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.