2016 Congressional Primaries
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 03:05:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2016 Congressional Primaries
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 ... 49
Author Topic: 2016 Congressional Primaries  (Read 72274 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,409
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #700 on: August 06, 2016, 03:41:12 AM »

bernie pls gulag
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,518
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #701 on: August 06, 2016, 06:22:32 AM »

like with Shuster, Republican primary voters prove that they don't care about corruption.

but with the defeats of Huelskamp and Forbes, they seem to be moving in a less right-wing direction. Huh.
Not true.
Forbes was defeated because he wasn't from this district, not because he was too rightwing.

The Club for Growth/New York scored big wins in many open seats:
-New York: Claudia Tenney
-North Carolina: Ellmer defeated and a Club for Growth guy won an open seat
-Ohio: Boehner replaced by a tea party guy
-Michigan: 2 open seats won by potential freedom caucus members (http://cookpolitical.com/story/9585)
- Indiana: Jim Banks and Hollinsworth both won and they are 2 freedom caucus guys.

The freedom caucus will most likely become a larger faction among the GOP after the 2016 elections.


 
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #702 on: August 06, 2016, 01:13:10 PM »

like with Shuster, Republican primary voters prove that they don't care about corruption.

but with the defeats of Huelskamp and Forbes, they seem to be moving in a less right-wing direction. Huh.
Not true.
Forbes was defeated because he wasn't from this district, not because he was too rightwing.

The Club for Growth/New York scored big wins in many open seats:
-New York: Claudia Tenney
-North Carolina: Ellmer defeated and a Club for Growth guy won an open seat
-Ohio: Boehner replaced by a tea party guy
-Michigan: 2 open seats won by potential freedom caucus members (http://cookpolitical.com/story/9585)
- Indiana: Jim Banks and Hollinsworth both won and they are 2 freedom caucus guys.

The freedom caucus will most likely become a larger faction among the GOP after the 2016 elections.
Forbes was NOT part of the Freedom Caucus. Is the guy who beat him in the primary a Freedom Caucus guy?
So, the FC lost Huelskamp's seat, but picked up Todd Young's seat and held Marlin Stutzman's seat. If Coaudia Tenney wins (R+3 district, but more competitive downballot), she may join (making her the only woman in the FC, pending other races). They also picked up NC-13 and OH-08, and one or two of the Michigan seats. So, if all the candidates mentioned win, the FC has gained (up to) 5 seats (including OH-08) as of now. What about future primaries? Does the Freedom Caucus have more chances to pick up new seats (like in Florida)? I hope not.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,518
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #703 on: August 06, 2016, 01:16:50 PM »

like with Shuster, Republican primary voters prove that they don't care about corruption.

but with the defeats of Huelskamp and Forbes, they seem to be moving in a less right-wing direction. Huh.
Not true.
Forbes was defeated because he wasn't from this district, not because he was too rightwing.

The Club for Growth/New York scored big wins in many open seats:
-New York: Claudia Tenney
-North Carolina: Ellmer defeated and a Club for Growth guy won an open seat
-Ohio: Boehner replaced by a tea party guy
-Michigan: 2 open seats won by potential freedom caucus members (http://cookpolitical.com/story/9585)
- Indiana: Jim Banks and Hollinsworth both won and they are 2 freedom caucus guys.

The freedom caucus will most likely become a larger faction among the GOP after the 2016 elections.
Forbes was NOT part of the Freedom Caucus. Is the guy who beat him in the primary a Freedom Caucus guy?
So, the FC lost Huelskamp's seat, but picked up Todd Young's seat and held Marlin Stutzman's seat. If Coaudia Tenney wins (R+3 district, but more competitive downballot), she may join (making her the only woman in the FC, pending other races). They also picked up NC-13 and OH-08, and one or two of the Michigan seats. So, if all the candidates mentioned win, the FC has gained (up to) 5 seats (including OH-08) as of now. What about future primaries? Does the Freedom Caucus have more chances to pick up new seats (like in Florida)? I hope not.
Never said Forbes was a member of the FC.

My point is that the Freedom Caucus is likely to at least expand their influence inside the GOP (becoming proportionnally more important), or even picking seats.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,401
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #704 on: August 07, 2016, 03:19:30 AM »

Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #705 on: August 08, 2016, 09:02:09 PM »

Based on late ballots, calling the Washington 7th 2nd slot for Walkinshaw (Jayapal has the first slot) and the Washington 8th 2nd slot for Ventrella (Reichert has the first slot). That wraps up WA, though counting will continue for another week - 35k ballots left statewide but it's not enough to realistically change anything.

Tomorrow is the next set of primaries. VT/CT/MN/WI. First polls close at 7 ET.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,409
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #706 on: August 08, 2016, 09:11:27 PM »
« Edited: August 08, 2016, 09:18:50 PM by a.scott »

So is it fair to assume DesJarlais won his primary on the backs of Democratic votes?  The seat is too Republican to be even remotely competitive now, but obviously the TNDP would rather face DesJarlais than anyone else, if not keep him around as a punching bag.

Who did the party establishment back in that primary, by the way?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #707 on: August 09, 2016, 02:51:36 AM »

Proud of my state, and happy to see FF Jayapal triggering people who assume she's a socialist because Bernie endorsed her. Yeah, Murray and Inslee are safe, and so is Heck.

There was a socialist elected to the Seattle City Council, my guess is that the people here believe Jayapal is that person.  Jayapal is a Democratic State Senator, not a Seattle City Councilor.
Jayapal is a socialist too.
Just because someone is really liberal and you don't like them doesn't make then a socialist. 
If Bernie, who is a socialist, endorsed them during the primaries, they are a socialist. During primaries, there is no reason why a socialist would endorse a non-socialist as it would be against their interests.
And this is the reason that you sound really stupid when you type.

Right, because I tell the truth that everyone else is unable to realize.

A Bernie endorsement = socialist? I guess Hillary's a socialist too, then!

He endorsed Hillary in a general election. That's different.

So he couldn't have just thought Jayapal was the best candidate? And we shouldn't judge her on her own merits, and not merely the fact that Sanders supported her?

This might have had some merit if Bernie had endorsed lots of downballot democrats across the country, but he's only endorsed 5: Teachout, Kingston (lost primary), Flores (lost primary), Jayapal, Canova. The one thing they all have in common - all considered the most liberal candidate running, and all endorsed Sanders for President. That pretty much screams socialist.

#SocialistsAgainstTheIranDeal
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,773


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #708 on: August 09, 2016, 07:05:51 AM »

So is it fair to assume DesJarlais won his primary on the backs of Democratic votes?  The seat is too Republican to be even remotely competitive now, but obviously the TNDP would rather face DesJarlais than anyone else, if not keep him around as a punching bag.

Who did the party establishment back in that primary, by the way?

It didn't really seem like either.  My friend base was pro-Starrett, but that doesn't seem to mean anything these days.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #709 on: August 09, 2016, 10:42:16 AM »

So, some bad news - tonight is really only three states, not four - Connecticut doesn't have any contested congressional/gubernatorial races.

This is the list of contested races by poll closing time:

7 ET: VT SEN D, VT GOV D & R

9 ET: MN-1 R, MN-2 R, MN-4 D & R, MN-5 D, MN-6 D & R, MN-7 R, WI-1 D & R, WI-3 D, WI-4 D, WI-6 D, WI-7 D & R, WI-8 R, WI SEN D

Results links:

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/vermont
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/minnesota
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/wisconsin
Logged
Drew
drewmike87
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 997
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #710 on: August 09, 2016, 12:10:42 PM »
« Edited: August 09, 2016, 12:13:39 PM by drewmike87 »

I voted this morning a bit after 7 when the polls opened.  Unlike the spring presidential primary, the place was a ghost town.  Only a few other people there.  They're predicting a 16% turnout in WI.  Afterward, I posted on Facebook that I voted.  An out of state relative was suprised that there would be a primary during summer vacations, etc.  Apparently it used to be held in the Fall (I'm new to WI) until Walker and Co. came along.  Another way to minimize turnout.

EDIT:  I'm in WI-2, so no Ryan/Nehlen for me.  Nothing contested on the GOP side here.  Just the Senate race, DA race, and county treasurer were the only ones contested in the primaries.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #711 on: August 09, 2016, 12:12:00 PM »

I voted this morning a bit after 7 when the polls opened.  Unlike the spring presidential primary, the place was a ghost town.  Only a few other people there.  They're predicting a 16% turnout in WI.  Afterward, I posted on Facebook that I voted.  An out of state relative was suprised that there would be a primary during summer vacations, etc.  Apparently it used to be held in the Fall (I'm new to WI) until Walker and Co. came along.  Another way to minimize turnout.

A lot of states have their primaries around this time. Why is it a conspiracy to limit voting?
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #712 on: August 09, 2016, 06:00:03 PM »

Vermont Polls have closed.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #713 on: August 09, 2016, 06:13:54 PM »


Usually there's a slow vote count there, for some reason. As bad as MS.
Counting votes is hard when you're high
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #714 on: August 09, 2016, 06:31:09 PM »

30 minutes pass, not a single vote gets counted.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #715 on: August 09, 2016, 06:43:43 PM »

Scott is losing badly in Vermont, but with only .4% in (108 votes, lol.) Minter is up by 15.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #716 on: August 09, 2016, 06:43:58 PM »

First Results (0.4% in):

Minter leads Dunne 51%-37% for VT DEM GOV
Lisman leads Scott (!) 71%-29% for VT REP GOV
Leahy leads Ericson 89%-11% for VT DEM SEN
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #717 on: August 09, 2016, 06:45:02 PM »

0.7% in, Minter ahead of Dunne 48%-36%, Lisman ahead of Scott 62%-38%
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #718 on: August 09, 2016, 06:59:13 PM »

Scott's up 59-41 now. The Democratic race is closer, with Dunne leading Minter by 2.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #719 on: August 09, 2016, 07:01:21 PM »

Minter up 44-39, Scott 65/35.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #720 on: August 09, 2016, 07:02:20 PM »

Minter up 45-43, Scott 60-40, Leahy 87-13

3% in
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #721 on: August 09, 2016, 07:12:17 PM »

Minter 52-38, Scott 66-34, Leahy 89-11

8% in
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #722 on: August 09, 2016, 07:14:32 PM »

Leahy projected to win renomination for VT SEN D. up 89-11 with 12% in.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #723 on: August 09, 2016, 07:14:40 PM »

This looks good so far, Scott is the Strongest republican and Minter is the Weakest Democrat
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #724 on: August 09, 2016, 07:22:27 PM »

I'm also shocked at how bad Galbraith is doing
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 ... 49  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 10 queries.