How can a course made to fit a standardized test promote questioning of accepted interpretations of history? (not just rhetorical, I'm legitimately curious)
This is a semantic problem around the word "accepted." A standardized test can ask students to compare different interpretations of an event in an essay or in multiple choice questions.
I can understand how an essay could do this. For a multiple choice question its not as clear to me. I remember when I took the SAT subject test on history - it just struck me as completely enmeshed in unreflective conventional wisdom. I don't like the College Board and their monopoly on this sort of thing, but I guess it's possible they did a decent job on this one.