Opinion of The Living Bible (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 02:42:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of The Living Bible (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Acceptable translation		  
#2
Unacceptable translation		  
#3
Other		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 15

Author Topic: Opinion of The Living Bible  (Read 657 times)
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,959
« on: April 16, 2014, 05:50:23 AM »
Quote from: Emperor Scott on April 14, 2014, 10:19:48 PM

KJV (1 Sam. 20:30) "Thou son of a perverse rebellious woman."
TLB: "You son of a b****."


It'll be fun if it catches on.

2214 AD;

'It's not a metaphor, he literally was the son of a female dog cositsinthebible. Checkmate, science!'
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,959
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2014, 12:10:17 PM »
Quote from: True Federalist on April 16, 2014, 08:57:11 AM
Quote from: afleitch on April 16, 2014, 05:50:23 AM
Quote from: Emperor Scott on April 14, 2014, 10:19:48 PM

KJV (1 Sam. 20:30) "Thou son of a perverse rebellious woman."
TLB: "You son of a b****."


It'll be fun if it catches on.

2214 AD;

'It's not a metaphor, he literally was the son of a female dog cositsinthebible. Checkmate, science!'

Those who think that way would never accept the Living Bible because it's not based on the Textus Receptus.

I think I saw a joke fly over your head. It's in the grass behind you somewhere Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.