Why was Mississippi so close in 1976?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:58:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Mississippi so close in 1976?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Mississippi so close in 1976?  (Read 2029 times)
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 26, 2010, 01:13:02 PM »

Carter only beat Ford there by 1.88% (with under 50%).  Why didn't they vote for Deep South Democrat Jimmy Carter by a more substantial margin?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,802
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2010, 11:59:17 PM »

I hadn't noticed that it was so close. It is a bit surprising, but MS may have been much more disillusioned with the Democrats already by this time. They gave the largest percentage of popular votes to the GOP of any state both in 64 and 72, and hadn't gone to the Democrat in the electoral college since 56.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2010, 12:27:15 AM »
« Edited: November 27, 2010, 12:35:08 AM by Pacific Justice Mr. Fuzzleton »

I hadn't noticed that it was so close. It is a bit surprising, but MS may have been much more disillusioned with the Democrats already by this time. They gave the largest percentage of popular votes to the GOP of any state both in 64 and 72, and hadn't gone to the Democrat in the electoral college since 56.

This mostly, plus also I think the Ford Campaign really targeted this state, along with Texas, Oklahoma, and maybe Louisiana.  I remember watching an ad by Senator Thurmond saying that Ford was more in touch with the South than Carter, which I'm guessing they ran in those particular states.
Logged
RichmondFalls
Rookie
**
Posts: 33


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2010, 09:09:39 PM »

All of the reasons above, as well as the fact that the tradition of black nonparticipation seemed to linger on in Mississippi, the state most opposed to civil rights. Black turnout was actually higher in 1980 in this state, which is why Reagan didn't win by a bigger margin than he did.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2010, 12:23:23 AM »

Strom's endorsement.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2010, 11:25:40 AM »


Carter won by 13 points in SC . . .
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,940
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2010, 07:45:30 PM »

It is strange that the other deep south states voted for the native son and yet this state was very narrow. Had Ford won Mississippi or Wisconsin along with Ohio he would have won.

I would have voted for Ford in 1976 had I been old enough.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.209 seconds with 10 queries.