MW: Child Allowance Act (Passed)

[Maxwell]

What it seems like this bill wants to do is create a Midwest Family Tax Deduction, and while I'm not a fan of deductions, I think the adamant-ness of my opposition goes down a little.

Either way, I think Adam's addition is actually good: Bill Gates' kids can raise their children just fine, they don't need an extra $100.

[windjammer]

What it seems like this bill wants to do is create a Midwest Family Tax Deduction, and while I'm not a fan of deductions, I think the adamant-ness of my opposition goes down a little.

Either way, I think Adam's addition is actually good: Bill Gates' kids can raise their children just fine, they don't need an extra $100.

Well, I mean, if you really believed initially that my goal was to give pocket money, well, of course you're less hostile .


Oh and sorry, yep, friendly to Adam's amendment .

[Sol]

This sounds good to me. Though if a tax credit does the same thing but has less opposition, I'm cool with it.

[Maxwell]

This sounds good to me. Though if a tax credit does the same thing but has less opposition, I'm cool with it.

I mean, I'd probably still be against it, but that's why I'm not here. I prefer a squeaky clean tax code

[LeBron]

This bill definitely does have very good intention, but I offer a further amendment to include further details and regulations (the new stuff included is bolded and italicized).

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Maxwell]

How are you guys even going to enforce where the $100 is going to be spent?

I went a little further and read the second part, but that still doesn't answer my question.

[windjammer]

I m back in France 2 days!

But maxwell is Right, 5) is unenforceable.
However I agree with the other changes (just replace 100000 by a higher number)

[LeBron]

How are you guys even going to enforce where the $100 is going to be spent?

If you look at Section 5, part a, it does that. The transaction will be required to be denied by the cashier/manager/owner if they're trying to buy something with government money that's prohibited from purchase under this bill. (In fact, I should probably put a provision about this in, to).

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

How are you guys even going to enforce where the $100 is going to be spent?

If you look at Section 5, part a, it does that. The transaction will be required to be denied by the cashier/manager/owner if they're trying to buy something with government money that's prohibited from purchase under this bill. (In fact, I should probably put a provision about this in, to).

a stamp on dollar bills? sorry, but that's really dumb.

[LeBron]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Alright, I'll withdrawal the idea, I guess.

Here's another altered amendment to the bill.

[Arturo Belano]

Is the amendment friendly?

[windjammer]

Is the amendment friendly?

Friendly

[Arturo Belano]

Cool! I hereby call a 24-hour vote on Adam's amendment.

[LeBron]

Aye!

[Spamage]

Aye, I suppose, at least it makes the Bill somewhat more appealing

[Arturo Belano]

Adam's amendment passes!

[windjammer]

Could we call a final vote please? I would like to sign that .

[Spamage]

Yes, we should call a final vote

[Arturo Belano]

Absolutely.

I hereby call a 48-hour vote on the Child Allowance Act.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[LeBron]

Aye!

[Sol]

Aye.

[tmthforu94]

If the aim of this bill is to help low-income, don't you reckon that $250k is a little high?

[windjammer]

If the aim of this bill is to help low-income, don't you reckon that $250k is a little high?

To be honest, what I wanted to do was more a tax break for people having children. Not only helping low income, but the middle class as well!

[Spamage]

Nay.

[Arturo Belano]

This bill passes!