Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 18, 2013, 04:19:05 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Congressional Elections
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Minnesota Senators
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Minnesota Senators (Read 2676 times)
Thanks for all the fish!
Avelaval
YaBB God
Posts: 1297
Minnesota Senators
«
on:
January 31, 2005, 10:57:01 am »
I've got a feeling Dayton is going to lose in 2006 and Coleman is going to lose in 2008. Anyone have any thoughts?
Logged
Signatures suck.
nick
nickshepDEM
YaBB God
Posts: 6955
Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #1 on:
January 31, 2005, 11:07:55 am »
Although he is vulnerable, I think Dayton will likely edge out a close victory in Minnesota unless his opponent is Mark Kennedy. If Kennedy runs, Dayton will probably lose. Ive heard from others that Kennedy is very popular in Minnesota and will be the toughest opponent for Dayton. Your from Minnesota so maybe you could ellaborate on that? Now, Norm Coleman. I believe he is gearing up to run for president in 2008.
Logged
Thanks for all the fish!
Avelaval
YaBB God
Posts: 1297
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #2 on:
January 31, 2005, 07:47:45 pm »
Coleman would certainly be the guy to stop Minnesota's run of voting democrat in presidential elections.
Logged
Signatures suck.
WalterMitty
YaBB God
Posts: 18996
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #3 on:
January 31, 2005, 08:57:54 pm »
mark dayton=joke.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 07, 2013, 09:42:11 pm
I did go to McDonald's because there was literally no time for anything else. No time to cook an honest meal.
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #4 on:
January 31, 2005, 09:51:14 pm »
I don't know the status of Norm Coleman's popularity or lack thereof in Minnesota at present. Of course, it's still over three years away, so it's not that relevant right now.
Mark Dayton is obviously one of the two most vulnerable Democrat senators up in 2006 (Bill Nelson being the other). He will have to campaign hard in order to win there.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29261
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #5 on:
January 31, 2005, 10:27:08 pm »
If you're worried, you should sign up for election day GOTV.
Logged
There Are Some Remedies Worse Than The Disease
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68302
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #6 on:
January 31, 2005, 10:45:51 pm »
Quote from: nickshepDEM on January 31, 2005, 11:07:55 am
Although he is vulnerable, I think Dayton will likely edge out a close victory in Minnesota unless his opponent is Mark Kennedy. If Kennedy runs, Dayton will probably lose. Ive heard from others that Kennedy is very popular in Minnesota and will be the toughest opponent for Dayton.
I don't know who told you that, but it's hardly true. Kennedy hasn't even broken 60% in his own congressional district, he's hardly very popular statewide. In fact, I'd consider him the weakest candidate out of Minnesota's 4 GOP Congressmen. The strongest would be Jim Ramstad, but he almost certainly will not run.
And if Coleman wants to run for president on a record of a 1 term Senator who hasn't done anything and just is a complete party hack, he can go ahead. But he will be very beatable in 2008 if he runs agin.
Logged
nick
nickshepDEM
YaBB God
Posts: 6955
Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #7 on:
January 31, 2005, 10:47:43 pm »
Quote from: Antifa BRTD on January 31, 2005, 10:45:51 pm
Quote from: nickshepDEM on January 31, 2005, 11:07:55 am
Although he is vulnerable, I think Dayton will likely edge out a close victory in Minnesota unless his opponent is Mark Kennedy. If Kennedy runs, Dayton will probably lose. Ive heard from others that Kennedy is very popular in Minnesota and will be the toughest opponent for Dayton.
I don't know who told you that, but it's hardly true. Kennedy hasn't even broken 60% in his own congressional district, he's hardly very popular statewide. In fact, I'd consider him the weakest candidate out of Minnesota's 4 GOP Congressmen. The strongest would be Jim Ramstad, but he almost certainly will not run.
And if Coleman wants to run for president on a record of a 1 term Senator who hasn't done anything and just is a complete party hack, he can go ahead. But he will be very beatable in 2008 if he runs agin.
I was just browsing over at another board and I saw someone say Kennedy was popular and may beat Dayton.
Logged
There Are Some Remedies Worse Than The Disease
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68302
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #8 on:
January 31, 2005, 10:50:03 pm »
Kennedy is pretty close to "generic GOP candidate". And in Minnesota generic GOP candidates may come close, but they usually don't win.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #9 on:
January 31, 2005, 11:22:32 pm »
Quote from: Antifa BRTD on January 31, 2005, 10:45:51 pm
Quote from: nickshepDEM on January 31, 2005, 11:07:55 am
Although he is vulnerable, I think Dayton will likely edge out a close victory in Minnesota unless his opponent is Mark Kennedy. If Kennedy runs, Dayton will probably lose. Ive heard from others that Kennedy is very popular in Minnesota and will be the toughest opponent for Dayton.
And if Coleman wants to run for president on a record of a 1 term Senator who hasn't done anything and just is a complete party hack, he can go ahead.
I'm hoping you never suggested Barack Obama for President in 2008. He actually wouldn't even be a one term Senator....more like a half of a term.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
There Are Some Remedies Worse Than The Disease
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68302
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #10 on:
January 31, 2005, 11:24:35 pm »
Quote from: Vice President Keystone Phil on January 31, 2005, 11:22:32 pm
Quote from: Antifa BRTD on January 31, 2005, 10:45:51 pm
Quote from: nickshepDEM on January 31, 2005, 11:07:55 am
Although he is vulnerable, I think Dayton will likely edge out a close victory in Minnesota unless his opponent is Mark Kennedy. If Kennedy runs, Dayton will probably lose. Ive heard from others that Kennedy is very popular in Minnesota and will be the toughest opponent for Dayton.
And if Coleman wants to run for president on a record of a 1 term Senator who hasn't done anything and just is a complete party hack, he can go ahead.
I'm hoping you never suggested Barack Obama for President in 2008. He actually wouldn't even be a one term Senator....more like a half of a term.
I have not and I have argued against people on DU who have.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #11 on:
January 31, 2005, 11:26:27 pm »
Quote from: Antifa BRTD on January 31, 2005, 11:24:35 pm
Quote from: Vice President Keystone Phil on January 31, 2005, 11:22:32 pm
Quote from: Antifa BRTD on January 31, 2005, 10:45:51 pm
Quote from: nickshepDEM on January 31, 2005, 11:07:55 am
Although he is vulnerable, I think Dayton will likely edge out a close victory in Minnesota unless his opponent is Mark Kennedy. If Kennedy runs, Dayton will probably lose. Ive heard from others that Kennedy is very popular in Minnesota and will be the toughest opponent for Dayton.
And if Coleman wants to run for president on a record of a 1 term Senator who hasn't done anything and just is a complete party hack, he can go ahead.
I'm hoping you never suggested Barack Obama for President in 2008. He actually wouldn't even be a one term Senator....more like a half of a term.
I have not and I have argued against people on DU who have.
Good. It really is too bad people think he's ready to run for President. A few months ago, the guy was still a State Senator.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
nick
nickshepDEM
YaBB God
Posts: 6955
Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #12 on:
January 31, 2005, 11:39:07 pm »
Quote from: Vice President Keystone Phil on January 31, 2005, 11:26:27 pm
Good. It really is too bad people think he's ready to run for President. A few months ago, the guy was still a State Senator.
I agree. He needs to develop in the US senate first and see where the country is 10-12 years from now. By then this country may be ready for an African American preisdent, but right now I cant see it happening. Still, its not everyday that a young, charismatic, intelligent, political star rises. You cant blame the Dem's for being excited about the guy.
«
Last Edit: February 01, 2005, 10:12:31 am by nickshepDEM
»
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
Posts: 4256
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #13 on:
February 01, 2005, 01:29:02 am »
True. When your farm system is empty, any good new player tends to elicit a lot of attention.
Logged
don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes
look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
RomneyGekko Situation Hairgel
Flyers2004
YaBB God
Posts: 10514
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.87
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #14 on:
February 01, 2005, 03:35:22 pm »
I know I want Santorum out, but I hope we don't lose Dayton. This is definitely going to drain from the DSCC's effort to oust Santorum. You would think the Dems minimum has bottomed out, but it seems it's only getting worse. I was also hoping for pickups in Missouri and Virginia.
Logged
DOUCHEBAGGERY AT ITS FINEST!
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #15 on:
February 08, 2005, 04:17:19 pm »
According to Politics1.com, former Senator Rod Grams has announced that he is considering another run for Senate. Dayton beat Grams by about 5 points in 2000.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
Posts: 22413
Re: Minnesota Senators
«
Reply #16 on:
February 09, 2005, 11:17:54 pm »
Quote from: Vice President Keystone Phil on February 08, 2005, 04:17:19 pm
According to Politics1.com, former Senator Rod Grams has announced that he is considering another run for Senate. Dayton beat Grams by about 5 points in 2000.
Dayton isn't running anymore, but if he was. Grams v. Dayton would be a lot closer in 06 than in 2000, now that everybody has seen who Senator Mark Dayton really is....
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...