British Columbia provincial election 2013
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 08:29:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  British Columbia provincial election 2013
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16
Author Topic: British Columbia provincial election 2013  (Read 37383 times)
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,647
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #275 on: May 15, 2013, 02:15:32 AM »

NDP leads by 465, with 7 boxes to come in V-Point Grey (Clark's riding)
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,647
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #276 on: May 15, 2013, 02:21:33 AM »

Still 7 boxes to report, but NDP leads by 316.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,647
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #277 on: May 15, 2013, 02:30:41 AM »

5 boxes left, NDP leads by 408 votes in Point Grey.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #278 on: May 15, 2013, 02:58:07 AM »

How the f uck did this happen?
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #279 on: May 15, 2013, 03:00:47 AM »

So, for those who really don't follow Canada, can anyone give a brief history of bad polling in Canada?  From reading this thread, it doesn't seem like there was the slightest reason to expect anything like this.  And despite an apparent history of bad polling, the posters here, who seem quite knowledgeable and  follow this day in day out, seemed to take the polls as as gospel, which given their consistency seemed reasonable except....
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,789
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #280 on: May 15, 2013, 06:02:02 AM »

Wow. Haha. Wow. I wasn't following this election because of school, then work, but wooooooooow.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,048
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #281 on: May 15, 2013, 07:03:09 AM »

So, for those who really don't follow Canada, can anyone give a brief history of bad polling in Canada?  From reading this thread, it doesn't seem like there was the slightest reason to expect anything like this.  And despite an apparent history of bad polling, the posters here, who seem quite knowledgeable and  follow this day in day out, seemed to take the polls as as gospel, which given their consistency seemed reasonable except....

I was a little hesitant, ever since last year's Alberta election which was just as big of a surprise.

While I went to bed nearly in tears, I can say I feel smug at least about Clark losing her seat. LOL. It's been a while since that has happened (Premier loses seat despite winning election).

The Swing to the Liberals was 0.62% which should have actually netted them 0 seats. However, they gained a net 2 seats. Elections with small swings result in both parties gaining seats, the Liberals gained 6 and the NDP 4. Biggest pick up for the Liberals was Surrey-Fleetwood (5.64% needed). Vancouver-Point Grey was the biggest for the NDP (5.05% needed).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #282 on: May 15, 2013, 07:08:11 AM »

The 1992 election over here all over again. Sh!t, sh!t, sh!t.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #283 on: May 15, 2013, 07:11:07 AM »

All the Canadian pollster's with all their staff should be taken out and shot.

One should be symbolically pardoned.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #284 on: May 15, 2013, 07:19:31 AM »

So, for those who really don't follow Canada, can anyone give a brief history of bad polling in Canada?  From reading this thread, it doesn't seem like there was the slightest reason to expect anything like this.  And despite an apparent history of bad polling, the posters here, who seem quite knowledgeable and  follow this day in day out, seemed to take the polls as as gospel, which given their consistency seemed reasonable except....

Canadian voters are much more "swingy"
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #285 on: May 15, 2013, 07:20:46 AM »

So by-election for Clark or will she step down?
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #286 on: May 15, 2013, 07:57:49 AM »

So by-election for Clark or will she step down?

By-election, obviously. She pulled off a miracle and certainly deserves it. Like Charest, she should've chosen discretion over valour and run somewhere safer even if away from home (is VPG even her home base?). Some people suggested a heavy break of undecideds to the Grits.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #287 on: May 15, 2013, 08:11:10 AM »

So by-election for Clark or will she step down?

By-election, obviously. She pulled off a miracle and certainly deserves it. Like Charest, she should've chosen discretion over valour and run somewhere safer even if away from home (is VPG even her home base?). Some people suggested a heavy break of undecideds to the Grits.

Her home base is Port Moody, which isn't much better than VPG. Still, I'm surprised she didn't give  an MLA from some place like Kelowna so she could have a safe seat. She's going to have to now anyways.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,048
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #288 on: May 15, 2013, 08:15:18 AM »

All the Canadian pollster's with all their staff should be taken out and shot.

One should be symbolically pardoned.

I hope you are referring to me Wink
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #289 on: May 15, 2013, 08:38:36 AM »

All the Canadian pollster's with all their staff should be taken out and shot.

One should be symbolically pardoned.

I hope you are referring to me Wink

He certainly wasn't referring to Forum.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #290 on: May 15, 2013, 08:41:56 AM »

I guess Forum is the provincial pollster we rely on now.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,048
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #291 on: May 15, 2013, 08:43:08 AM »

I guess Forum is the provincial pollster we rely on now.

I agree. It's funny how you were bashing them not to long ago. But they were the closest in both BC and Alberta.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #292 on: May 15, 2013, 08:47:46 AM »

Once could be a fluke. Twice not so much. But I'll eat crow with just about everyone else. Tongue
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,048
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #293 on: May 15, 2013, 09:03:16 AM »

I have some ideas as to what went wrong:

*"Silent majority" - a large percentage of centre-right people who don't care about politics that much, don't follow it to a high degree, don't do polls, but get out to vote. I think there is a higher percentage of people like this in BC and Alberta. From my times as an interviewer at EKOS, I can tell you that BC and Alberta are the most hostile provinces to pollsters.

*Undecideds went Liberal - seems to me that just like in Alberta, there were lots of undecideds, and they broke heavily to the devil they knew- the Liberals. One thing that pollsters could have done is look at how the undecideds were leaning and extrapolate for all undecideds. It's risky business, but I think it would have been more accurate in this case.

*Lying respondents - with the Liberals so unpopular and using dirty campaign tactics (well, negative ads), respondents were less likely to admit voting Liberal. Perhaps respondents in BC and Alberta are more likely to lie anyways due to just being hostile/distrustful of pollsters. That might account for why the lied in online surveys and IVR surveys.

Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #294 on: May 15, 2013, 09:10:53 AM »

All our politicians should also discard the quaint notion that one can remain entirely positive, or more accurately that one can let attacks go unanswered. All jugular all the time, period.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,048
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #295 on: May 15, 2013, 09:12:35 AM »

All our politicians should also discard the quaint notion that one can remain entirely positive, or more accurately that one can let attacks go unanswered. All jugular all the time, period.

Maybe. But there is a certain nobility to being entirely positive. Maybe it's better to be positive and lose then to be negative and win.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,087
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #296 on: May 15, 2013, 09:55:57 AM »

The NDP lost because they didn't make implementation of a Mixed-Member Proportional (MMP) fair voting system the centerpiece of their campaign.

[Sorry, couldn't keep a straight face.]
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,048
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #297 on: May 15, 2013, 10:19:49 AM »

Another reason for wrong polls: low voter turnout. Perhaps Disaffected voters chose to stay home rather than vote NDP?
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #298 on: May 15, 2013, 10:22:38 AM »

Voter turnout was 52%.
Logged
Qavvavak
Rookie
**
Posts: 66
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -7.00, S: -7.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #299 on: May 15, 2013, 10:29:48 AM »

Another reason for wrong polls: low voter turnout. Perhaps Disaffected voters chose to stay home rather than vote NDP?

Maybe reason this news headline "Voters with Indian Status cards turned away from polling station"

note: cant post the link here to over 20 posts. but you can go google from above title.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 9 queries.